It is well known that firms are more likely to issue equity when their market values are high, relative to book and past market values, and to repurchase equity when their market values are low. We document that the resulting effects on capital structure are very persistent. As a consequence, current capital structure is strongly related to historical market values. The results suggest the theory that capital structure is the cumulative outcome of past attempts to time the equity market.

NBER. Tim Opler also holds an appointment at Deutsche Morgan Grenfell. We thank

This paper tests traditional capital structure models against the alternative of a pecking order model of corporate financing. The basic pecking order model, which predicts external debt financing driven by the internal financial deficit, has much greater timeseries explanatory power than a static tradeoff model, which predicts that each firm adjusts gradually toward an optimal debt ratio. We show that our tests have the power to reject the pecking order against alternative tradeoff hypotheses. The statistical power of some usual tests of the tradeoff model is virtually nil. � 1999 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved. JEL classification: G32

Abstract not found

Governors or its staff. For comments, we thank Mitch Berlin, Erik Berglöf, Øyvind Bøhren, Yehning Chen,

This paper analyzes how property rights affect the allocation of firms' available resources among different types of assets. In particular, we investigate emp irically for a large number of countries whether firms in environments with more secure property rights allocate available resources more towards intangible assets and consequentially grow faster. We find that improved asset allocation due to better property rights has an effect on growth in sectoral value added equal to improved access to financing arising from greater financial development. The results are robust using various samples and specifications, including controlling for growth opportunities.

This paper provides new evidence of how macroeconomic conditions affect capital structure choice. We model firms ’ target capital structures as a function of macroeconomic conditions and firm-specific variables. We split our sample based on a measure of financial constraints. We find that target leverage is counter-cyclical for the relativelyunconstrained sample, but pro-cyclical for the relativelyconstrained sample. The choice of what type of security to issue/repurchase is significantly related to deviations from the target capital structure, particularly for the constrained sample. Macroeconomic conditions are significant for issue choice for unconstrained firms but less so for constrained firms. Our results support the hypothesis that unconstrained firms are able to time their issue choice to periods when macroeconomic conditions are favorable, while constrained firms take what they can get.

There are two tax incentives for corporations to hedge: to increase debt capacity and interest tax deductions, and to reduce expected tax liability if the tax function is convex. We test whether these incentives affect the extent of corporate hedging with derivatives. Using an explicit measure of tax function convexity, we find no evidence that firms hedge in response to tax convexity. Our analysis does, however, indicate that firms hedge to increase debt capacity, with increased tax benefits averaging 1.1 percent of firm value. Our results also indicate that firms hedge because of expected financial distress costs and firm size.

of Greg Du�ee and Tyler Shumway have improved this paper. The views expressed herein are the authors own and

Using a unique dataset of East Asian non-financial companies, this paper examines a firm's choice between local currency, foreign currency, and synthetic local currency (hedged foreign currency) debt. We also exploit the Asian financial crisis of 1997 as a natural experiment to investigate the role of debt type in financial and operating performance. We find evidence of unique, as well as common, factors that determine each debt type's use thus indicating the importance of examining debt at a disaggregated level. Specifically, the use of natural local currency debt is associated primarily with factors found by many other studies to determine total debt levels such as size, profitability, and the market-to-book ratio. Foreign currency debt is used as a complement to local currency debt by firms with substantial capital needs seeking to lower the cost or extend the maturity structure of debt. However, the use of foreign currency debt is also determined by asset and income type consistent with agency cost and financial risk management theories. The use of synthetic local debt is primarily determined by risk management concerns. Finally, contrary to anecdotal reports and existing theory, we find no evidence that unhedged foreign currency debt is associated with significantly worse performance during the Asian crisis. Surprisingly, the use of synthetic local currency debt is associated with the biggest drop in market value, possibly due to currency derivative market illiquidity during the crisis.