Results 1 
3 of
3
On the Expressive Power of Programming Languages
 Science of Computer Programming
, 1990
"... The literature on programming languages contains an abundance of informal claims on the relative expressive power of programming languages, but there is no framework for formalizing such statements nor for deriving interesting consequences. As a first step in this direction, we develop a formal noti ..."
Abstract

Cited by 161 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
The literature on programming languages contains an abundance of informal claims on the relative expressive power of programming languages, but there is no framework for formalizing such statements nor for deriving interesting consequences. As a first step in this direction, we develop a formal notion of expressiveness and investigate its properties. To validate the theory, we analyze some widely held beliefs about the expressive power of several extensions of functional languages. Based on these results, we believe that our system correctly captures many of the informal ideas on expressiveness, and that it constitutes a foundation for further research in this direction. 1 Comparing Programming Languages The literature on programming languages contains an abundance of informal claims on the expressive power of programming languages. Arguments in these contexts typically assert the expressibility or nonexpressibility of programming constructs relative to a language. Unfortunately, pro...
Correctness of Monadic State: An Imperative CallbyNeed Calculus
 In Proc. 25th ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages
, 1998
"... The extension of Haskell with a builtin state monad combines mathematical elegance with operational efficiency: ffl Semantically, at the source language level, constructs that act on the state are viewed as functions that pass an explicit store data structure around. ffl Operationally, at the imp ..."
Abstract

Cited by 20 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The extension of Haskell with a builtin state monad combines mathematical elegance with operational efficiency: ffl Semantically, at the source language level, constructs that act on the state are viewed as functions that pass an explicit store data structure around. ffl Operationally, at the implementation level, constructs that act on the state are viewed as statements whose evaluation has the sideeffect of updating the implicit global store in place. There are several unproven conjectures that the two views are consistent. Recently, we have noted that the consistency of the two views is far from obvious: all it takes for the implementation to become unsound is one judiciouslyplaced betastep in the optimization phase of the compiler. This discovery motivates the current paper in which we formalize and show the correctness of the implementation of monadic state. For the proof, we first design a typed callbyneed language that models the intermediate language of the compiler, to...
On the Orthogonality of Assignments and Procedures in Algol
 In Proc. 20th ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages
, 1993
"... According to folklore, Algol is an "orthogonal" extension of a simple imperative programming language with a callbyname functional language. The former contains assignments, branching constructs, and compound statements; the latter is based on the typed calculus. In an attempt to formal ..."
Abstract
 Add to MetaCart
According to folklore, Algol is an "orthogonal" extension of a simple imperative programming language with a callbyname functional language. The former contains assignments, branching constructs, and compound statements; the latter is based on the typed calculus. In an attempt to formalize the claim of "orthogonality", we define a simple version of Algol and an extended calculus. The calculus includes the full firule and rules for the reduction of assignment statements and commands. It has the usual properties, e.g., it satisfies a ChurchRosser and Strong Normalization Theorem. In support of the claim that the imperative and functional components are orthogonal to each other, we show that the proofs of these theorems are combinations of separate ChurchRosser and Strong Normalization theorems for each sublanguage. An acclaimed consequence of Algol's orthogonal design is the idea that the evaluation of a program has two distinct phases. The first phase corresponds to an unrolling ...