It is well known that one can build models of full higher-order dependent type theory (also called the calculus of constructions) using partial equivalence relations (PERs) and assemblies over a partial combinatory algebra (PCA). But the idea of categories of PERs and ERs (total equivalence relations) can be applied to other structures as well. In particular, we can easily dene the category of ERs and equivalencepreserving continuous mappings over the standard category Top 0 of topological T 0 -spaces; we call these spaces (a topological space together with an ER) equilogical spaces and the resulting category Equ. We show that this category|in contradistinction to Top 0 |is a cartesian closed category. The direct proof outlined here uses the equivalence of the category Equ to the category PEqu of PERs over algebraic lattices (a full subcategory of Top 0 that is well known to be cartesian closed from domain theory). In another paper with Carboni and Rosolini (cited herein) a more abstract categorical generalization shows why many such categories are cartesian closed. The category Equ obviously contains Top 0 as a full subcategory, and it naturally contains many other well known subcategories. In particular, we show why, as a consequence of work of Ershov, Berger, and others, the Kleene-Kreisel hierarchy of countable functionals of nite types can be naturally constructed in Equ from the natural numbers object N by repeated use in Equ of exponentiation and binary products. We also develop for Equ notions of modest sets (a category equivalent to Equ) and assemblies to explain why a model of dependent type theory is obtained. We make some comparisons of this model to other, known models. 1

Formalising mathematics in dependent type theory often requires to use setoids, i.e. types with an explicit equality relation, as a representation of sets. This paper surveys some possible denitions of setoids and assesses their suitability as a basis for developing mathematics. In particular, we argue that a commonly advocated approach to partial setoids is unsuitable, and more generally that total setoids seem better suited for formalising mathematics. 1

We present a new approach to introducing an extensional propositional equality in Intensional Type Theory. Our construction is based on the observation that there is a sound, intensional setoid model in Intensional Type theory with a proof-irrelevant universe of propositions and -rules for - and -types. The Type Theory corresponding to this model is decidable, has no irreducible constants and permits large eliminations, which are essential for universes. Keywords. Type Theory, categorical models. 1. Introduction and Summary In Intensional Type Theory (see e.g. [11]) we differentiate between a decidable definitional equality (which we denote by =) and a propositional equality type (Id ( ; ) for any given type ) which requires proof. Typing only depends on definitional equality and hence is decidable. In Intensional Type Theory the type corresponding to the principle of extensionality Ext x2:(x) f;g2(x2:(x)) ( x2 Id (x) (f(x); g(x))) ! Id x2:(x) (f; g) is not...

We present a new implementation of a reflexive tactic which solves equalities in a ring structure inside the Coq system. The e#ciency is improved to a point that we can now prove equalities that were previously beyond reach. A special care has been taken to implement e#cient algorithms while keeping the complexity of the correctness proofs low.

Partial equivalence relations (and categories of these) are a standard tool in semantics of type theories and programming languages, since they often provide a cartesian closed category with extended definability. Using the theory of exact categories, we give a category-theoretic explanation of why the construction of a category of partial equivalence relations often produces a cartesian closed category. We show how several familiar examples of categories of partial equivalence relations fit into the general framework. 1 Introduction Partial equivalence relations (and categories of these) are a standard tool in semantics of programming languages, see e.g. [2, 5, 7, 9, 15, 17, 20, 22, 35] and [6, 29] for extensive surveys. They are usefully applied to give proofs of correctness and adequacy since they often provide a cartesian closed category with additional properties. Take for instance a partial equivalence relation on the set of natural numbers: a binary relation R ` N\ThetaN on th...

. Essential concepts of algebraic specification refinement are translated into a type-theoretic setting involving System F and Reynolds' relational parametricity assertion as expressed in Plotkin and Abadi's logic for parametric polymorphism. At first order, the type-theoretic setting provides a canonical picture of algebraic specification refinement. At higher order, the type-theoretic setting allows future generalisation of the principles of algebraic specification refinement to higher order and polymorphism. We show the equivalence of the acquired type-theoretic notion of specification refinement with that from algebraic specification. To do this, a generic algebraic-specification strategy for behavioural refinement proofs is mirrored in the type-theoretic setting. 1 Introduction This paper aims to express in type theory certain essential concepts of algebraic specification refinement. The benefit to algebraic specification is that inherently first-order concepts are tra...

Abstract. The quotient operation is a standard feature of set theory, where a set is partitioned into subsets by an equivalence relation. We reinterpret this idea for higher order logic, where types are divided by an equivalence relation to create new types, called quotient types. We present a design to mechanically construct quotient types as new types in the logic, and to support the automatic lifting of constants and theorems about the original types to corresponding constants and theorems about the quotient types. This design exceeds the functionality of Harrison’s package, creating quotients of multiple mutually recursive types simultaneously, and supporting the equivalence of aggregate types, such as lists and pairs. Most importantly, this design supports the creation of higher order quotients, which enable the automatic lifting of theorems with quantification over functions of any higher order. 1

Abstract. The quotient operation is a standard feature of set theory, where a set is partitioned into subsets by an equivalence relation. We reinterpret this idea for Higher Order Logic (HOL), where types are divided by an equivalence relation to create new types, called quotient types. We present a tool for the Higher Order Logic theorem prover to mechanically construct quotient types as new types in the HOL logic, and to automatically lift constants and theorems about the original types to corresponding constants and theorems about the quotient types. This package exceeds the functionality of Harrison’s package, creating quotients of multiple mutually recursive types simultaneously, and supporting the equivalence of aggregate types, such as lists and pairs. Most importantly, this package successfully creates higher-order quotients, automatically lifting theorems with quantification over functions of any higher order. This is accomplished through the use of partial equivalence relations, a possibly nonreflexive version of equivalence relations. We demonstrate this tool by lifting Abadi and Cardelli’s sigma calculus. 1

Data Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 4.5.4 Special Approaches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 4.6 Semantics of Programming Languages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 4.6.1 Semantics of Ada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 4.6.2 Action Semantics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 4.7 Specification Languages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 4.7.1 Early Algebraic Specification Languages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 4.7.2 Recent Algebraic Specification Languages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 4.7.3 The Common Framework Initiative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 5 Methodology 57 5.1 Development Phases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 5.1.1 Applica...

Abstract. General purpose theorem provers provide sophisticated proof methods, but lack some of the advanced structuring mechanisms found in specification languages. This paper builds on previous work extending the theorem prover Isabelle with such mechanisms. A way to build the quotient type over a given base type and an equivalence relation on it, and a generalised notion of folding over quotiented types is given as a formalised high-level step called a design tactic. The core of this paper are four axiomatic theories capturing the design tactic. The applicability is demonstrated by derivations of implementations for finite multisets and finite sets from lists in Isabelle. 1