Abstract not found

This paper is the first one in a sequel of papers resulting from the authors Habilitationsschrift [22] which are devoted to determine the growth in proofs of standard parts of analysis. A hierarchy (GnA # )n#I N of systems of arithmetic in all finite types is introduced whose definable objects of type 1 = 0(0) correspond to the Grzegorczyk hierarchy of primitive recursive functions. We establish the following extraction rule for an extension of GnA # by quantifier--free choice AC--qf and analytical axioms # having the form #x # #y ## sx#z # F0 (including also a `non-- standard' axiom F - which does not hold in the full set--theoretic model but in the strongly majorizable functionals): From a proof GnA # +AC--qf + # # #u 1 , k 0 #v ## tuk#w 0 A0(u, k, v, w) one can extract a uniform bound # such that #u 1 , k 0 #v ## tuk#w # #ukA0 (u, k, v, w) holds in the full set--theoretic type structure. In case n = 2 (resp. n = 3) #uk is a polynomial (resp. an elementary recursive function) in k, u M := #x. max(u0, . . . , ux). In the present paper we show that for n # 2, GnA # +AC--qf+F - proves a generalization of the binary Knig's lemma yielding new conservation results since the conclusion of the above rule can be verified in G max(3,n) A # in this case. In a subsequent paper we will show that many important ine#ective analytical principles and theorems can be proved already in G2A # +AC--qf+# for suitable #. 1

Abstract not found

Let U and V be complete separable metric spaces, Vu compact in V and G : U IR a continuous function. For a large class of (usually non--constructive) proofs of uniqueness theorems Vu G(u, v1 ) = inf G(u, v) = G(u, v2) v1 = v2 one can extract an e#ective modulus of uniqueness # by logical analysis, i.e.

Abstract not found

In classical mathematics, the existence of a solution is often proven indirectly, non-constructively, without an efficient method for constructing the corresponding object. In many cases, we can extract an algorithm from a classical proof: e.g., when an object is (non-constructively) proven to be unique in a locally compact space (or when there are two such objects with a known lower bound on the distance between them). In many other practical situations, a (seemingly) natural formalization of the corresponding practical problem leads to a non-compact set. In this paper, we show that often, in such situations, we can extract efficient algorithms from classical proofs – if we explicitly take into account (implicit) knowledge about the situation. Specifically, we show that if we consistently apply Heisenberg’s operationalism idea and define objects in terms of directly measurable quantities, then we get a Girard-domain type representation in which a natural topology is, in effect, compact – and thus, uniqueness implies computability. 1

Abstract. Constructive mathematics, mathematics in which the existence of an object means that that we can actually construct this object, started as a heavily restricted version of mathematics, a version in which many commonly used mathematical techniques (like the Law of Excluded Middle) were forbidden to maintain constructivity. Eventually, it turned out that not only constructive mathematics is not a weakened version of the classical one – as it was originally perceived – but that, vice versa, classical mathematics can be viewed as a particular (thus, weaker) case of the constructive one. Crucial results in this direction were obtained by M. Gelfond in the 1970s. In this paper, we mention the history of these results, and show how these results affected constructive mathematics, how they led to new algorithms, and how they affected the current activity in logic programming-related research.

Abstract. We show how two iterated products of selection functions can both be used in conjunction with system T to interpret, via the dialectica interpretation and modified realizability, full classical analysis. We also show that one iterated product is equivalent over system T to Spector’s bar recursion, whereas the other is T-equivalent to modified bar recursion. Modified bar recursion itself is shown to arise directly from the iteration of a different binary product of ‘skewed ’ selection functions. Iterations of the dependent binary products are also considered but in all cases are shown to be T-equivalent to the iteration of the simple products. §1. Introduction. Gödel’s [13] so-called dialectica interpretation reduces the consistency of Peano arithmetic to the consistency of a quantifier-free calculus of functionals T. In order to extend Gödel’s interpretation to full classical analysis PA ω + CA, Spector [18] made use of the fact that PA ω + CA can be embedded, via the negative translation, into HA ω + ACN + DNS. Here PA ω

Abstract. Intuitively, the more constraints we impose on a problem, the more difficult it is to solve it. However, in practice, difficult-to-solve problems sometimes get solved when we impose additional constraints and thus, make the problems seemingly more complex. In this methodological paper, we explain this seemingly counter-intuitive phenomenon, and we show that, dues to this explanation, additional constraints can serve as a useful heuristic in solving difficult problems.

Abstract. In the last fifteen years, the traditional proof interpretations of modified realizability and functional (dialectica) interpretation in finite-type arithmetic have been adapted by taking into account majorizability considerations. One of such adaptations, the monotone functional interpretation of Ulrich Kohlenbach, has been at the center of a vigorous program in applied proof theory dubbed proof mining. We discuss some of the traditional and majorizability interpretations, including the recent bounded interpretations, and focus on the main theoretical techniques behind proof mining. Contents