Abstract not found

this article. This paper has also benefited greatly from constructive feedback from Gordon Logan, Mike Stadler, and our other reviewers. We thank Joanie Sanchez for her assistance in running Experiment 1. This research was supported by a Social Science Faculty Research Award from Yale University. Portions of this research were presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Research in Ophthalmology and Vision, Fort Lauderdale, FL, in May, 1997, and at the Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Philadelphia, PA, in November, 1997

Search for conjunctions of highly discriminable features can be rapid or even parallel. This article explores, three possible accounts based on (a) perceptual segregation, (b) conjunction detectors, and (c) inhibition controlled separately by two or more distractor features. Search rates for conjunctions of color, size, orientation, and direction of motion correlated closely with an independent measure of perceptual segregation. However, they appeared unrelated to the physi-ology of single-unit responses. Each dimension contributed additively to conjunction search rates, suggesting that each was checked independently of the others. Unknown targets appear to be found only by serial search for each in turn. Searching through 4 sets of distractors was slower than searching through 2. The results suggest a modification of feature integration theory, in which attention is controlled not only by a unitary "window " but also by a form of feature-based inhibition. Objects in the real world vary in a large number of prop-erties, at least some of which appear to be coded by special-ized, independent channels or modules in the perceptual

blindness seems especially paradoxical: it implies that identifying "forest before trees." For later vision with processing has proceeded to the level of determining scrutiny, reverse hierarchy routines focus attention that one element is a conceptual or categorical repeti- to specific, active, low-level units, incorporating into tion of another---a repetition to which we are then blind. conscious perception detailed information available How can we know that two elements are similar if we there. Reverse Hierarchy Theory dissociates between are blind to the double occurrence? A similar paradox early explicit perception and implicit low-level vision, appears when we briefly view a scene containing many explaining a variety of phenomena. Feature search elements. We can more easily report the average value "pop-out" is attributed to high areas, where large re- of a parameter (such as the mean size or orientation of ceptive fields underlie spread attention detecting cat- elements) than ju

We propose a model of the spatial visual processes underlying the identification and representation of the shape of primitive spatial regions. We propose that a region's boundaries are sensed at multiple scales by boundariness detectors that give graded responses, that stimulated boundariness detectors of similar scale, s, connect to one another across a distance that is proportional to their scale, and that they connect via cores, where a core encodes the middles and widths of the region and hence is a trace in (x,y,s), i.e., 3D scale space. 3 INTRODUCTION One of the more impressive feats that the human visual system performs is the identification of individual objects from the continuous distribution of light that falls on the retina. To accomplish this task, the observer uses information from the image to identify regions of interest on the basis of spatial changes in luminance, color, texture, motion, etc. He also interprets information from the image on the basis of prior experi...

Spatial attention: Visual selection and deployment over space The attentional spotlight and spatial cueing Attentional shifts, splits, and resolution Object-based Selection The visual search paradigm Top-down and bottom-up control of attention Inhibitory mechanisms of attention Invalid cueing Negative priming Inhibition of return Temporal attention: Visual selection and deployment over time Single target search Attentional blink and attentional dwell time Repetition blindness NEURAL MECHANISMS OF SELECTION Single-cell physiological method Event-related potentials Functional imaging: PET and fMRI

... only one component of more complex "event files" that link information about stimulus and response aspects of an experienced episode.

In three experiments, subjects attempted to track multiple items as they moved independently and unpredictably about a display. Performance was not impaired when the items were briefly (but completely) occluded at various times during their motion, suggesting that occlusion is taken into account when computing enduring perceptual objecthood. Unimpaired performance required the presence of accretion and deletion cues along fixed contours at the occluding boundaries. Performance was impaired when items were present on the visual field at the same times and to the same degrees as in the occlusion conditions, but disappeared and reappeared in ways which did not implicate the presence of occluding surfaces (e.g. by imploding and exploding into and out of existence, instead of accreting and deleting along a fixed contour). Unimpaired performance did not require visible occluders (i.e. Michotte’s tunnel effect) or globally consistent occluder positions. We discuss implications of these results for theories of objecthood in visual attention. What is an object? This is a question which draws together researchers from

This article defends the claim that a significant part of visual perception (called "early vision") is impervious to the influence of beliefs, expectations or knowledge. We examine a wide range of empirical evidence that has been cited in support of the continuity of vision and cognition and argue that the evidence either shows withinvision top-down effects, or else the extra-visual effects that are demonstrated occur before the operation of the autonomous early vision system (through the allocation of focal attention) or after the visual system has produced its 3D shape-description (through the intervention of post-visual decision processes).

This article presents a theory that inte~ates space-based and object-based approaches to visual attention. The theory puts together M. P. van Oeffelen and P. G. Vos's ( 1982, 1983) COntour DEtector (CODE) theory of perceptual grouping by proximity with C. Bundesen's (1990) theory of visual attention (TVA). CODE provides input to TVA, accounting for spatially based between-object selection, and TVA converts the input to output, accounting for feature- and category-based withinobject selection. CODE clusters nearby items into perceptual groups that are both perceptual objects and regions of space, thereby integrating object-based and space-based approaches to attention. The combined theory provides a quantitative account of the effects of grouping by proximity and dis~nce between items on reaction time and accuracy data in 7 empirical situations that shaped the current literature on visual spatial attention. For the last decade the attention literature has been embroiled in a debate over the nature of visual spatial attention that focuses on the "thing " that attention selects (e.g., Baylis &