• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Other Seers ▼
    RefSeer AckSeer CollabSeer SeerSeer
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations | Disambiguate

PMAC: A parallelizable message authentication code. Contribution to NIST. October 16, 2000. Earlier version of the present paper (0)

by P Rogaway
Add To MetaCart

Tools

Sorted by:
Results 1 - 1 of 1

PMAC: Proposal to NIST for a parallelizable message authentication code

by Phillip Rogaway, John Black , 2001
"... accounting. PMAC uses #|M |/n# block-cipher invocations for any nonempty message M . (The empty string takes one block-cipher invocation). We compare with the CBC MAC: The "basic" CBC MAC, which assumes that the message is a nonzero multiple of the block length and which is only secure when all m ..."
Abstract - Cited by 2 (0 self) - Add to MetaCart
accounting. PMAC uses #|M |/n# block-cipher invocations for any nonempty message M . (The empty string takes one block-cipher invocation). We compare with the CBC MAC: The "basic" CBC MAC, which assumes that the message is a nonzero multiple of the block length and which is only secure when all messages to be MACed are of one fixed length, uses the same number of block cipher calls: |M |/n. The version of the CBC MAC described in [10], which removes the two restrictions just mentioned, uses the same number of calls as PMAC, #|M |/n#. Obligatory padding (to support short-final-block messages) and standard methods to process the final block (double or triple encryption, to achieve security across variable-length messages) can raise the number of block-cipher calls to as much as #|M + 1|/n# + 2. Thus PMAC saves between 0 and 3 block-cipher calls compared to the various versions of the CBC MAC. As with any mode, there is further overhead beyond the block-cipher calls. Per block, this overhead is about three n-bit xor operations plus associated logic. The work for this associated logic will vary according to whether or not one precomputed L(i)-values, whether or not there is an ntz() instruction available, and on other factors. Though some of the needed L(i)-values are likely to be pre-computed, calculating these values "on the fly" is not too expensive. Starting with 0 n we form successive o#sets by xoring the previous o#set with L, 2
The National Science Foundation
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2010 The Pennsylvania State University