Results 1 -
4 of
4
Multi-criteria Reinforcement Learning
, 1998
"... We consider multi-criteria sequential decision making problems where the vector-valued evaluations are compared by a given, fixed total ordering. Conditions for the optimality of stationary policies and the Bellman optimality equation are given. The analysis requires special care as the topology int ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 10 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We consider multi-criteria sequential decision making problems where the vector-valued evaluations are compared by a given, fixed total ordering. Conditions for the optimality of stationary policies and the Bellman optimality equation are given. The analysis requires special care as the topology introduced by pointwise convergence and the order-topology introduced by the preference order are in general incompatible. Reinforcement learning algorithms are proposed and analyzed. Preliminary computer experiments confirm the validity of the derived algorithms. It is observed that in the medium-term multicriteria RL often converges to better solutions (measured by the first criterion) than their single-criterion counterparts. These type of multicriteria problems are most useful when there are several optimal solutions to a problem and one wants to choose the one among these which is optimal according to another fixed criterion. Example applications include alternating games, when in addition...
Recursive Utility for Stochastic Trees
- Operations Research
, 1996
"... Stochastic trees are semi-Markov processes represented using tree diagrams. Such trees have been found useful for prescriptive modeling of temporal medical treatment choice. We consider utility functions over stochastic trees which permit recursive evaluation in a graphically intuitive manner analog ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 1 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Stochastic trees are semi-Markov processes represented using tree diagrams. Such trees have been found useful for prescriptive modeling of temporal medical treatment choice. We consider utility functions over stochastic trees which permit recursive evaluation in a graphically intuitive manner analogous to decision tree rollback. Such rollback is computationally intractable unless a low-dimensional preference summary exists. We present the most general classes of utility functions having specific tractable preference summaries. We examine three preference summaries - memoryless, Markovian, and semi-Markovian - which promise both computational feasibility and convenience in assessment. Their use is illustrated by application to a previous medical decision analysis of whether to perform carotid endarterectomy. 1 A stochastic tree is a graphical modeling approach which combines useful features from semi-Markov process transition diagrams and decision trees. This paper concerns itself wit...
Controlled Markovprocesses with arbitrary numerical criteria, Theory
- Probab. Appl
, 1982
"... In the theory of controlled Markov processes with discrete time we study, as a rule, controlled processes either with the total reward criterion or with criteria for mean reward per unit time. ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 1 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
In the theory of controlled Markov processes with discrete time we study, as a rule, controlled processes either with the total reward criterion or with criteria for mean reward per unit time.
Axioms and Examples Related to Ordinal Dynamic Programming
, 1981
"... We continue the work of Sobel on axioms for preferences in discrete Markov processes. Sufficient conditions for optimality are presented, and the logical interrelation with previous axiomations is discussed. Axioms and Examples Related to Ordinal Dynamic Programming^ by Charles E. Blair We consider ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
We continue the work of Sobel on axioms for preferences in discrete Markov processes. Sufficient conditions for optimality are presented, and the logical interrelation with previous axiomations is discussed. Axioms and Examples Related to Ordinal Dynamic Programming^ by Charles E. Blair We consider deterministic sequential Markov process. Let X be a set of states. For each xeX, M(x) C x is the set of states that can be reached in one step from x. Define A to be the set of mappings 6:X-»-X such that 6(x)eM(x) for every xeX. A policy is an infinite sequence "5,6 ^... where 6.eA. A stationary policy has all 6. equal. For each policy-n = ^[^y •• • ^^ ^ each xeX there is a unique sequence X x^x-... such that X-, = x and x =5(x T),n = l, 2,... We will 12 n n n-1 ' ' denote this sequence by P(ir,x). For xeX, $ is defined to be the set of sequences P(tt,x) that arise as it varies over all possible policies.

