Results 11  20
of
59
Estimating the integrated likelihood via posterior simulation using the harmonic mean identity
 Bayesian Statistics
, 2007
"... The integrated likelihood (also called the marginal likelihood or the normalizing constant) is a central quantity in Bayesian model selection and model averaging. It is defined as the integral over the parameter space of the likelihood times the prior density. The Bayes factor for model comparison a ..."
Abstract

Cited by 24 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The integrated likelihood (also called the marginal likelihood or the normalizing constant) is a central quantity in Bayesian model selection and model averaging. It is defined as the integral over the parameter space of the likelihood times the prior density. The Bayes factor for model comparison and Bayesian testing is a ratio of integrated likelihoods, and the model weights in Bayesian model averaging are proportional to the integrated likelihoods. We consider the estimation of the integrated likelihood from posterior simulation output, aiming at a generic method that uses only the likelihoods from the posterior simulation iterations. The key is the harmonic mean identity, which says that the reciprocal of the integrated likelihood is equal to the posterior harmonic mean of the likelihood. The simplest estimator based on the identity is thus the harmonic mean of the likelihoods. While this is an unbiased and simulationconsistent estimator, its reciprocal can have infinite variance and so it is unstable in general. We describe two methods for stabilizing the harmonic mean estimator. In the first one, the parameter space is reduced in such a way that the modified estimator involves a harmonic mean of heaviertailed densities, thus resulting in a finite variance estimator. The resulting
SubregionAdaptive Integration of Functions Having a Dominant Peak
 JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND GRAPHICAL STATISTICS
, 1993
"... Many statistical multiple integration problems involve integrands that have a dominant peak. In applying numerical methods to solve these problems, statisticians have paid relatively little attention to existing quadrature methods and available software developed in the numerical analysis literature ..."
Abstract

Cited by 20 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Many statistical multiple integration problems involve integrands that have a dominant peak. In applying numerical methods to solve these problems, statisticians have paid relatively little attention to existing quadrature methods and available software developed in the numerical analysis literature. One reason these methods have been largely overlooked, even though they are known to be more efficient than Monte Carlo for wellbehaved problems of low dimensionality, may be that when applied naively they are poorly suited for peakedintegrand problems. In this paper we use transformations based on "splitt" distributions to allow the integrals to be efficiently computed using a subregionadaptive numerical integration algorithm. Our splitt distributions are modifications of those suggested by Geweke (1989) and may also be used to define Monte Carlo importance functions. We then compare our approach to Monte Carlo. In the several examples we examine here, we find subregionadaptive inte...
Shotgun stochastic search for “large p” regression
 Journal of the American Statistical Association
, 2007
"... Model search in regression with very large numbers of candidate predictors raises challenges for both model specification and computation, and standard approaches such as Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) and stepwise methods are often infeasible or ineffective. We describe a novel shotgun stochastic ..."
Abstract

Cited by 17 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Model search in regression with very large numbers of candidate predictors raises challenges for both model specification and computation, and standard approaches such as Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) and stepwise methods are often infeasible or ineffective. We describe a novel shotgun stochastic search (SSS) approach that explores “interesting” regions of the resulting, very highdimensional model spaces to quickly identify regions of high posterior probability over models. We describe algorithmic and modeling aspects, priors over the model space that induce sparsity and parsimony over and above the traditional dimension penalization implicit in Bayesian and likelihood analyses, and parallel computation using cluster computers. We discuss an example from gene expression cancer genomics, comparisons with MCMC and other methods, and theoretical and simulationbased aspects of performance characteristics in largescale regression model search. We also provide software implementing the methods.
Warp bridge sampling
 J. Comp. Graph. Statist
, 2002
"... Bridge sampling, a general formulation of the acceptance ratio method in physics for computing freeenergy difference, is an effective Monte Carlo method for computing normalizingconstantsof probabilitymodels. The method was originallyproposedfor cases where the probabilitymodels have overlappingsup ..."
Abstract

Cited by 16 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Bridge sampling, a general formulation of the acceptance ratio method in physics for computing freeenergy difference, is an effective Monte Carlo method for computing normalizingconstantsof probabilitymodels. The method was originallyproposedfor cases where the probabilitymodels have overlappingsupport. Voter proposed the idea of shifting physical systems before applying the acceptance ratio method to calculate freeenergy differencesbetween systems that are highlyseparatedin a con � guration space.The purpose of this article is to push Voter’s idea further by applying more general transformations, including stochastic transformations resulting from mixing over transformation groups, to the underlying variables before performing bridge sampling. We term such methods warp bridgesampling to highlightthe fact that in addition to location shifting (i.e., centering)one can further reduce the difference/distance between two densities by warping their shapes without changing the normalizing constants. Real databased empirical studies using the fullinformationitem factor modeland a nonlinearmixed model are providedto demonstrate the potentially substantial gains in Monte Carlo ef � ciency by going beyond centering and by using ef � cient bridge sampling estimators. Our general method is also applicable to a couple of recent proposals for computing marginal likelihoods and Bayes factors because these methods turn out to be covered by the general bridge sampling framework.
Bayes Factor of Model Selection Validates FLMP
, 2001
"... P against several alternative models such as a weighted averaging model (WTAV), which is an inefficient algorithm for combining the auditory and visual sources. For (2) The WTAV predicts that two sources can never be more informative than one. In direct contrasts, the FLMP has consistently and signi ..."
Abstract

Cited by 13 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
P against several alternative models such as a weighted averaging model (WTAV), which is an inefficient algorithm for combining the auditory and visual sources. For (2) The WTAV predicts that two sources can never be more informative than one. In direct contrasts, the FLMP has consistently and significantly outperformed the WTAV w a w v w w wa w v i j ( ) ( ) . / / da = + + = +  a v ( )( ) . / / da = +   1 1 1 Copyright 2001 Psychonomic Society, Inc. The research was supported by grants from the National Institute of Deafness and Other Communicative Disorders (PHS R01DC00236), the National Science Foundation (Challenge Grant CDA9726363), Intel Corporation,and the University of California Digital Media Innovation Program. D.W.M. is highly appreciative of the encouraging support of Dan Friedman and Bill Rowe. We thank William Batchelder, James Cutting, In Jae Myung,Mark Pitt, and John Wixted for their constructive comments on an earlier version of the paper. Correspon
Computationally efficient methods for selecting among mixtures of graphical models
 Bayesian Statistics 6
, 1999
"... We describe computationally efficient methods for Bayesian model selection. The methods select among mixtures in which each component is a directed acyclic graphical model (mixtures of DAGs or MDAGs), and can be applied to data sets in which some of the random variables are not always observed. The ..."
Abstract

Cited by 9 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We describe computationally efficient methods for Bayesian model selection. The methods select among mixtures in which each component is a directed acyclic graphical model (mixtures of DAGs or MDAGs), and can be applied to data sets in which some of the random variables are not always observed. The modelselection criterion that we consider is the posterior probability of the model (structure) given data. Our modelselection problem is difficult because (1) the number of possible model structures grows superexponentially with the number of random variables and (2) missing data necessitates the use of computationally slow approximations of model posterior probability. We argue that simple searchandscore algorithms are infeasible for a variety of problems, and introduce a feasible approach in which parameter and structure search is interleaved and expected data is treated as real data. Our approach can be viewed as the combination of (1) a modified Cheeseman–Stutz asymptotic approximation for model posterior probability and (2) the Expectation–Maximization algorithm. We evaluate our procedure for selecting among MDAGs on synthetic and real examples.
A Bayesian approach to the selection and testing of mixture models
 Statistica Sinica
, 2001
"... Abstract: An important aspect of mixture modeling is the selection of the number of mixture components. In this paper, we discuss the Bayes factor as a selection tool. The discussion will focus on two aspects: computation of the Bayes factor and prior sensitivity. For the computation, we propose a v ..."
Abstract

Cited by 9 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract: An important aspect of mixture modeling is the selection of the number of mixture components. In this paper, we discuss the Bayes factor as a selection tool. The discussion will focus on two aspects: computation of the Bayes factor and prior sensitivity. For the computation, we propose a variant of Chib’s estimator that accounts for the nonidentifiability of the mixture components. To reduce the prior sensitivity of the Bayes factor, we propose to extend the model with a hyperprior. We further discuss the use of posterior predictive checks for examining the fit of the model. The ideas are illustrated by means of a psychiatric diagnosis example.
The hierarchical rater model for rated test items and its application to largescale educational assessment data. Paper presented April 23
, 1999
"... Single and multiple ratings of test items have become a stock component of standardized educational tests and surveys. For both formative and summative evaluation of raters, a number of multipleread rating designs are now commonplace (Wilson and Hoskens, 1999), including designs with as many as six ..."
Abstract

Cited by 7 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Single and multiple ratings of test items have become a stock component of standardized educational tests and surveys. For both formative and summative evaluation of raters, a number of multipleread rating designs are now commonplace (Wilson and Hoskens, 1999), including designs with as many as six raters per item (e.g. Sykes, Heidorn and Lee, 1999). As digital image based distributed rating becomes commonplace, we expect the use of multiple raters as a routine part of test scoring to grow; increasing the number of raters also raises the possibility of improving the precision of examinee proficiency estimates. In this paper we develop Patz’s (1996) hierarchical rater model (HRM) for polytomously scored item response data, and show how it can be used, for example, to scale examinees and items, to model aspects of consensus among raters, and to model individual rater severity and consistency effects. The HRM treats examinee responses to openended items as unobserved discrete variables, and it explicitly models the “proficiency ” of raters in assigning accurate scores as well as the proficiency