this article we focus on the seemingly contradictory results of two quite different approaches to the problem, one dealing with the properties of visually perceived space and the other with visually directed action

The accuracy of depth judgments that are based on binocular disparity or structure from motion (motion parallax and object rotation) was studied in 3 experiments. In Experiment 1, depth judgments were recorded for computer simulations of cones specified by binocular disparity, motion parallax, or stereokinesis. In Experiment 2, judgments were recorded for real cones in a structured environment, with depth information from binocular disparity, motion parallax, or object rotation about the y-axis. In both of these experiments, judgments from binocular disparity information were quite accurate, but judgments on the basis of geometrically equivalent or more robust motion information reflected poor recovery of quantitative depth information. A 3rd experiment demonstrated stereoscopic depth constancy for distances of 1 to 3 m using real objects in a well-illuminated, structured viewing environment in which monocular depth cues (e.g., shading) were minimized. It has been pointed out that the geometric information supporting the perception of depth from binocular disparity is actually less determinate than that supporting the recovery of structure from object rotation or motion parallax

In this investigation of monocular perception of egocentric distance, the authors advocate the necessity of a perception-action approach because calibration is intrinsic to definite distance perception. A helmet-mounted camera and display were used to isolate optic flow generated by participants ' head movements toward a target, and participants ' reaches to place a stylus either in a target hole (Experiments 1, 2, and 4) or aligned under a target surface (Experiment 3) were analyzed. Conclusions are that binocular distance perception is accurate, monocular distance perception yields compression that is not eliminated by feedback, but feedback is used to eliminate underestimation generated by restriction of the size of the visual field. The study of definite distance perception requires a perception-action approach. As we argue, the reason is twofold. First, definite distance perception entails calibration and, therefore, a task-specific action that provides both feedback and a standard of accuracy. Calibration is complete once measurements are within a task-specific tolerance. The tolerance is determined by error variability and task requirements,

To examine the role of extraretinal eye position information (EEPI) in visual perception of target location in normal room illumination, subjects participated in experiments in which EEPI was manipulated using the eye press maneuver with either monocular or binocular viewing. The viewing condition and eye press caused EEPI and retinal information about target location to conflict. Pointing responses in eye press trials were all in the direction of EEPI showing that EEPI is the dominant source of information in egocentric visual space perception. In binocular viewing, version and vergence occur in response to the eye press to maintain fusion and EEPI based on these movements also determine perceived location. An unanticipated finding was that the eye press was variable in its effectiveness in rotating the eye, which contributed to large variability in pointing errors and suggested the method would be a poor choice for future work. @ 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. Extraretinal Outflowsignals Strabismus Vergence Perception of location

This study presents three ¢ndings concerning the mechanisms of depth perception. First, the shape of the three-dimensional percept evoked by two-frame motion is de¢ned solely by the rotation component around an axis in the frontoparallel plane; the visual system assigns a default value to this rotation component to arrive at a unique solution. Second, when the visual axes of two eyes are almost parallel, the visual system uses a default vergence value to reconstruct stereoscopic depth. Third, the default vergence and default rotation angles are highly correlated across subjects. This correlation implies that the two modalities share a common scaling default at an internal level.

The difference between the way in which binocular disparity scales with viewing distance and the way in which motion parallax scales with viewing distance introduces a potential indirect cue for viewing distance: the viewing distance is the only distance at which disparity and motion specify the same depth. The present study examines whether this information is used. Two simulated ellipsoids were presented on a computer screen in complete darkness. The two ellipsoids were 6 to the left and right of straight ahead. Subjects set the width and depth of each ellipsoid to match a tennis ball, and set the distance of the one on the right to half that of the one on the left. The distance of the left ellipsoid varied between trials. On half of the trials it was static. On the other half it was rotating up and down around its frontal horizontal axis. Rotating the left ellipsoid influenced its set depth: rotating ellipsoids were set to be much more spherical. There was no influence on the set depth of the other ellipsoid, or on the set width of either. The set distance of the right ellipsoid was also unaffected. We conclude that subjects do not combine binocular disparity and motion parallax to obtain more veridical information about viewing distance. 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

There has been no direct examination of stereoscopic depth perception at very large observation distances and depths. We measured perceptions of depth magnitude at distances where it is frequently reported without evidence that stereopsis is non-functional. We adapted methods pioneered at distances up to 9 m by R. S. Allison, B. J. Gillam, and E. Vecellio (2009) for use in a 381-m-long railway tunnel. Pairs of Light Emitting Diode (LED) targets were presented either in complete darkness or with the environment lit as far as the nearest LED (the observation distance). We found that binocular, but not monocular, estimates of the depth between pairs of LEDs increased with their physical depths up to the maximum depth separation tested (248 m). Binocular estimates of depth were much larger with a lit foreground than in darkness and increased as the observation distance increased from 20 to 40 m, indicating that binocular disparity can be scaled for much larger distances than previously realized. Since these observation distances were well beyond the range of vertical disparity and oculomotor cues, this scaling must rely on perspective cues. We also ran control experiments at smaller distances, which showed that estimates of depth and distance correlate poorly and that our metric estimation method gives similar results to a comparison method under the same conditions.

Monocular perception of egocentric distance via optic flow generated by head movement toward a target was investigated with a helmet-mounted video camera and display. Ability to perceive target distance was assessed with 2 response measures: verbal reports and reaches. Systematic and random errors differed as a function of the response measure. Verbal estimates of targets within and beyond reach were obtained before and after the performance of reaches to targets within reach. Systematic errors of verbal estimates changed but did not decrease overall. Random error decreased. Verbal estimates and reaches were performed concurrently to targets within reach. Verbal and reaching errors were uncorrelated. Verbal judgments appear to have been anchored using the range of distances experienced while reaching rather than being calibrated to the perceptual information itself. Discussion focuses on the advantages of action response measures. Reaching to bring the hand to a specific location in space is a usual component of everyday manual activities, such as reaching for a doorknob or a cup. The accurate execution of such activity requires information about both target distance and direction. We present research investigating the possibility that information about distance is revealed in optic flow generated by voluntary head motion. This possibility is underscored by several studies that confirm that reaching is more accurate when the head is free to move (Biguer,

Safety Research Grants Program. The ATSB is an operationally independent bureau within the Australian Government Department of Transport and Regional Services. The program funds a number of one-off research projects selected on a competitive basis. The program aims to encourage researchers from a broad range of related disciplines to consider or to progress their own ideas in aviation safety research. The work reported and the views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the Australian Government or the ATSB. However, the ATSB publishes and disseminates the grant reports in the interests of information exchange and as part of the overall safety aim of the grants program. © University of Wollongong 2006 ii CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS................................................................................. vii ABBREVIATIONS................................................................................................ ix