Abstract not found

SLD resolution with negation as finite failure (SLDNF) reflects the procedural interpretation of predicate calculus as a programming language and forms the computational basis for Prolog systems. Despite its advantages for stack-based memory management, SLDNF is often not appropriate for query evaluation for three reasons: a) it may not terminate due to infinite positive recursion; b) it may not terminate due to infinite recursion through negation; c) it may repeatedly evaluate the same literal in a rule body, leading to unacceptable performance. We address three problems fir a goal-oriented query evaluation of general logic programs by presenting tabled evaluation with delaying (SLG resolution).

We survey here various approaches which were proposed to incorporate negation in logic programs. We concentrate on the proof-theoretic and model-theoretic issues and the relationships between them.

In this paper, we review recent work aimed at the application of declarative logic programming to knowledge representation in artificial intelligence. We consider exten- sions of the language of definite logic programs by classical (strong) negation, disjunc- tion, and some modal operators and show how each of the added features extends the representational power of the language.

The alternating fixpoint of a logic program with negation is defined constructively. The underlying idea is monotonically to build up a set of negative conclusions until the least fixpoint is reached, using a transformation related to the one that defines stable models. From a fixed set of negative conclusions, the positive conclusions follow (without deriving any further negative ones), by traditional Horn clause semantics. The union of positive and negative conclusions is called the alternating xpoint partial model. The name "alternating" was chosen because the transformation runs in two passes; the first pass transforms an underestimate of the set of negative conclusions into an (intermediate) overestimate; the second pass transforms the overestimate into a new underestimate; the composition of the two passes is monotonic. The principal contributions of this work are (1) that the alternating fixpoint partial model is identical to the well-founded partial model, and (2) that alternating xpoint logic is at least as expressive as xpoint logic on all structures. Also, on finite structures, fixpoint logic is as expressive as alternating fixpoint logic.

We introduce the stable model semantics for disjunctive logic programs and deductive databases, which generalizes the stable model semantics, defined earlier for normal (i.e., non-disjunctive) programs. Depending on whether only total (2-valued) or all partial (3-valued) models are used we obtain the disjunctive stable semantics or the partial disjunctive stable semantics, respectively. The proposed semantics are shown to have the following properties: ffl For normal programs, the disjunctive (respectively, partial disjunctive) stable semantics coincides with the stable (respectively, partial stable) semantics. ffl For normal programs, the partial disjunctive stable semantics also coincides with the well-founded semantics. ffl For locally stratified disjunctive programs both (total and partial) disjunctive stable semantics coincide with the perfect model semantics. ffl The partial disjunctive stable semantics can be generalized to the class of all disjunctive logic programs. ffl B...

1 Introduction The perfect model semantics [ABW88, VG89b, Prz88a, Prz89b] provides an attractive alternative to the traditionally used semantics of logic programs based on Clark's completion of the program [Cla78, Llo84, Fit85, Kun87]. Perfect models are minimal models of the program, which can be equivalently described as iterated least fixed points of natural operators [ABW88, VG89b], as iterated least models of the program [ABW88, VG89b] or as preferred models with respect to a natural priority relation [Prz88a, Prz89b]. As a result, the perfect model semantics is not only very intuitive, but it also has been proven equivalent to suitable forms of all four major formalizations of non-monotonic reasoning in AI (see [Prz88b]) and is used in existing database [Zan88] and truth maintenance systems. Additionally, the perfect model semantics eliminates some serious drawbacks of Clark's semantics [Prz89b] and admits a natural sound and complete procedural mechanism, called SLSresolution [...

Abstract not found

The well-founded model provides a natural and robust semantics for logic programs with negative literals in rule bodies. Although various procedural semantics have been proposed for query evaluation under the well-founded semantics, the practical issues of implementation for effective and efficient computation of queries have been rarely discussed. This paper investigates two major implementation issues of query evaluation under the well-founded semantics, namely (a) to ensure that negative literals be resolved only after their positive counterparts have been completely evaluated, and (b) to detect and handle potential negative loops. We present efficient incremental algorithms for maintaining positive and negative dependencies among subgoals in a top-down evaluation. Both completely evaluated subgoals and potential negative loops are detected by inspecting the dependency information of a single subgoal. Our implementation can be viewed as an effective successor to SLDNF resolution, ex...

We study the expressive powers of two semantics for deductive databases and logic programming: the well-founded semantics and the stable semantics. We compare them especially to two older semantics, the two-valued and three-valued program completion semantics. We identify the expressive power of the stable semantics, and in fairly general circumstances that of the well-founded semantics. In particular, over infinite Herbrand universes, the four semantics all have the same expressive power. We discuss a feature of certain logic programming semantics, which we call the Principle of Stratification, a feature allowing a program to be built easily in modules. The three-valued program completion and well-founded semantics satisfy this principle. Over infinite Herbrand models, we consider a notion of translatability between the three-valued program completion and well-founded semantics which is in a sense uniform in the strata. In this sense of uniform translatability we show the well-founded semantics to be more expressive than the three-valued program completion. The proof is a corollary of our result that over non-Herbrand infinite models, the well-founded semantics is more expressive than the three-valued program completion semantics. 1