Results 1  10
of
35
Dominating Sets in Planar Graphs: BranchWidth and Exponential Speedup
, 2002
"... Graph minors theory, developed by Robertson & Seymour, provides a list of powerful theoretical results and tools. However, the wide spread opinion in Graph Algorithms community about this theory is that it is mainly of theoretical importance. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 72 (17 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Graph minors theory, developed by Robertson & Seymour, provides a list of powerful theoretical results and tools. However, the wide spread opinion in Graph Algorithms community about this theory is that it is mainly of theoretical importance.
PolynomialTime Data Reduction for DOMINATING SET
 Journal of the ACM
, 2004
"... Dealing with the NPcomplete Dominating Set problem on graphs, we demonstrate the power of data reduction by preprocessing from a theoretical as well as a practical side. In particular, we prove that Dominating Set restricted to planar graphs has a socalled problem kernel of linear size, achiev ..."
Abstract

Cited by 66 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Dealing with the NPcomplete Dominating Set problem on graphs, we demonstrate the power of data reduction by preprocessing from a theoretical as well as a practical side. In particular, we prove that Dominating Set restricted to planar graphs has a socalled problem kernel of linear size, achieved by two simple and easy to implement reduction rules. Moreover, having implemented our reduction rules, first experiments indicate the impressive practical potential of these rules. Thus, this work seems to open up a new and prospective way how to cope with one of the most important problems in graph theory and combinatorial optimization.
Subexponential parameterized algorithms on graphs of boundedgenus and Hminorfree Graphs
"... ... Building on these results, we develop subexponential fixedparameter algorithms for dominating set, vertex cover, and set cover in any class of graphs excluding a fixed graph H as a minor. Inparticular, this general category of graphs includes planar graphs, boundedgenus graphs, singlecrossing ..."
Abstract

Cited by 65 (22 self)
 Add to MetaCart
... Building on these results, we develop subexponential fixedparameter algorithms for dominating set, vertex cover, and set cover in any class of graphs excluding a fixed graph H as a minor. Inparticular, this general category of graphs includes planar graphs, boundedgenus graphs, singlecrossingminorfree graphs, and anyclass of graphs that is closed under taking minors. Specifically, the running time is 2O(pk)nh, where h is a constant depending onlyon H, which is polynomial for k = O(log² n). We introducea general approach for developing algorithms on Hminorfreegraphs, based on structural results about Hminorfree graphs at the
Bidimensionality and Kernels
, 2010
"... Bidimensionality theory appears to be a powerful framework in the development of metaalgorithmic techniques. It was introduced by Demaine et al. [J. ACM 2005] as a tool to obtain subexponential time parameterized algorithms for bidimensional problems on Hminor free graphs. Demaine and Hajiaghayi ..."
Abstract

Cited by 62 (25 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Bidimensionality theory appears to be a powerful framework in the development of metaalgorithmic techniques. It was introduced by Demaine et al. [J. ACM 2005] as a tool to obtain subexponential time parameterized algorithms for bidimensional problems on Hminor free graphs. Demaine and Hajiaghayi [SODA 2005] extended the theory to obtain polynomial time approximation schemes (PTASs) for bidimensional problems. In this paper, we establish a third metaalgorithmic direction for bidimensionality theory by relating it to the existence of linear kernels for parameterized problems. In parameterized complexity, each problem instance comes with a parameter k and the parameterized problem is said to admit a linear kernel if there is a polynomial time algorithm, called
The bidimensionality Theory and Its Algorithmic Applications
 Computer Journal
, 2005
"... This paper surveys the theory of bidimensionality. This theory characterizes a broad range of graph problems (‘bidimensional’) that admit efficient approximate or fixedparameter solutions in a broad range of graphs. These graph classes include planar graphs, map graphs, boundedgenus graphs and gra ..."
Abstract

Cited by 49 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
This paper surveys the theory of bidimensionality. This theory characterizes a broad range of graph problems (‘bidimensional’) that admit efficient approximate or fixedparameter solutions in a broad range of graphs. These graph classes include planar graphs, map graphs, boundedgenus graphs and graphs excluding any fixed minor. In particular, bidimensionality theory builds on the Graph Minor Theory of Robertson and Seymour by extending the mathematical results and building new algorithmic tools. Here, we summarize the known combinatorial and algorithmic results of bidimensionality theory with the highlevel ideas involved in their proof; we describe the previous work on which the theory is based and/or extends; and we mention several remaining open problems. 1.
Bidimensionality: New Connections between FPT Algorithms and PTASs
, 2005
"... We demonstrate a new connection between fixedparametertractability and approximation algorithms for combinatorial optimization problems on planar graphs and their generalizations. Specifically, we extend the theory of socalled "bidimensional " problems to show that essentially ..."
Abstract

Cited by 46 (7 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We demonstrate a new connection between fixedparametertractability and approximation algorithms for combinatorial optimization problems on planar graphs and their generalizations. Specifically, we extend the theory of socalled &quot;bidimensional &quot; problems to show that essentially all such problems have both subexponential fixedparameter algorithms and PTASs. Bidimensional problems include e.g. feedbackvertex set, vertex cover, minimum maximal matching, face cover, a series of vertexremoval problems, dominating set,edge dominating set,
Bidimensional parameters and local treewidth
 SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics
, 2004
"... Abstract. For several graph theoretic parameters such as vertex cover and dominating set, it is known that if their values are bounded by k then the treewidth of the graph is bounded by some function of k. This fact is used as the main tool for the design of several fixedparameter algorithms on min ..."
Abstract

Cited by 32 (17 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract. For several graph theoretic parameters such as vertex cover and dominating set, it is known that if their values are bounded by k then the treewidth of the graph is bounded by some function of k. This fact is used as the main tool for the design of several fixedparameter algorithms on minorclosed graph classes such as planar graphs, singlecrossingminorfree graphs, and graphs of bounded genus. In this paper we examine the question whether similar bounds can be obtained for larger minorclosed graph classes, and for general families of parameters including all the parameters where such a behavior has been reported so far. Given a graph parameter P, we say that a graph family F has the parametertreewidth property for P if there is a function f(p) such that every graph G ∈ F with parameter at most p has treewidth at most f(p). We prove as our main result that, for a large family of parameters called contractionbidimensional parameters, a minorclosed graph family F has the parametertreewidth property if F has bounded local treewidth. We also show “if and only if ” for some parameters, and thus this result is in some sense tight. In addition we show that, for a slightly smaller family of parameters called minorbidimensional parameters, all minorclosed graph families F excluding some fixed graphs have the parametertreewidth property. The bidimensional parameters include many domination and covering parameters such as vertex cover, feedback vertex set, dominating set, edgedominating set, qdominating set (for fixed q). We use these theorems to develop new fixedparameter algorithms in these contexts. 1
Equivalence of Local Treewidth and Linear Local Treewidth and its Algorithmic Applications
 In Proceedings of the 15th ACMSIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA’04
, 2003
"... We solve an open problem posed by Eppstein in 1995 [14, 15] and reenforced by Grohe [16, 17] concerning locally bounded treewidth in minorclosed families of graphs. A graph has bounded local treewidth if the subgraph induced by vertices within distance r of any vertex has treewidth bounded by a f ..."
Abstract

Cited by 32 (11 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We solve an open problem posed by Eppstein in 1995 [14, 15] and reenforced by Grohe [16, 17] concerning locally bounded treewidth in minorclosed families of graphs. A graph has bounded local treewidth if the subgraph induced by vertices within distance r of any vertex has treewidth bounded by a function of r (not n). Eppstein characterized minorclosed families of graphs with bounded local treewidth as precisely minorclosed families that minorexclude an apex graph, where an apex graph has one vertex whose removal leaves a planar graph. In particular, Eppstein showed that all apexminorfree graphs have bounded local treewidth, but his bound is doubly exponential in r, leaving open whether a tighter bound could be obtained. We improve this doubly exponential bound to a linear bound, which is optimal. In particular, any minorclosed graph family with bounded local treewidth has linear local treewidth. Our bound generalizes previously known linear bounds for special classes of graphs proved by several authors. As a consequence of our result, we obtain substantially faster polynomialtime approximation schemes for a broad class of problems in apexminorfree graphs, improving the running time from .
Graphs Excluding a Fixed Minor have Grids as Large as Treewidth, with Combinatorial and Algorithmic Applications through Bidimensionality
, 2005
"... We prove that any Hminorfree graph, for a fixed graph H, of treewidth w has an Ω(w) × Ω(w) grid graph as a minor. Thus grid minors suffice to certify that Hminorfree graphs have large treewidth, up to constant factors. This strong relationship was previously known for the special cases of plana ..."
Abstract

Cited by 28 (9 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
We prove that any Hminorfree graph, for a fixed graph H, of treewidth w has an Ω(w) × Ω(w) grid graph as a minor. Thus grid minors suffice to certify that Hminorfree graphs have large treewidth, up to constant factors. This strong relationship was previously known for the special cases of planar graphs and boundedgenus graphs, and is known not to hold for general graphs. The approach of this paper can be viewed more generally as a framework for extending combinatorial results on planar graphs to hold on Hminorfree graphs for any fixed H. Our result has many combinatorial consequences on bidimensionality theory, parametertreewidth bounds, separator theorems, and bounded local treewidth; each of these combinatorial results has several algorithmic consequences including subexponential fixedparameter algorithms and approximation algorithms.