This article provides a Markov model for the term structure of credit risk spreads. The model is based on Jarrow and Turnbull (1995), with the bankruptcy process following a discrete state space Markov chain in credit ratings. The parameters of this process are easily estimated using observable data. This model is useful for pricing and hedging corporate debt with imbedded options, for pricing and hedging OTC derivatives with counterparty risk, for pricing and hedging (foreign) government bonds subject to default risk (e.g., municipal bonds), for pricing and hedging credit derivatives, and for risk management. This article presents a simple model for valuing risky debt that explicitly incorporates a firm's credit rating as an indicator of the likelihood of default. As such, this article presents an arbitrage-free model for the term structure of credit risk spreads and their evolution through time. This model will prove useful for the pricing and hedging of corporate debt with We would like to thank John Tierney of Lehman Brothers for providing the bond index price data, and Tal Schwartz for computational assistance. We would also like to acknowledge helpful comments received from an anonymous referee. Send all correspondence to Robert A. Jarrow, Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853. The Review of Financial Studies Summer 1997 Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 481--523 1997 The Review of Financial Studies 0893-9454/97/$1.50 imbedded options, for the pricing and hedging of OTC derivatives with counterparty risk, for the pricing and hedging of (foreign) government bonds subject to default risk (e.g., municipal bonds), and for the pricing and hedging of credit derivatives (e.g. credit sensitive notes and spread adjusted notes). This model can also...

Abstract: We study the implications of imperfect information for term structures of credit spreads on corporate bonds. We suppose that bond investors cannot observe the issuer’s assets directly, and receive instead only periodic and imperfect accounting reports. For a setting in which the assets of the firm are a geometric Brownian motion until informed equityholders optimally liquidate, we derive the conditional distribution of the assets, given accounting data and survivorship. Contrary to the perfect-information case, there exists a default-arrival intensity process. That intensity is calculated in terms of the conditional distribution of assets. Credit yield spreads are characterized in terms of accounting information. Generalizations are provided. 1 We are exceptionally grateful to Michael Harrison for his significant contributions to this paper, which are noted within. We are also grateful for insightful research assistance

1 Wewould like to thank Dan Chen, Louis Gagnon and participants in seminars at the Kansas City Federal Reserve and the Credit Risk Conference, Toronto, for their comments. We are especially grateful to two referees for their detailed suggestions on improving the paper's presentation and content. Although it will not evidence runtime errors, the program code presented in this paper is intended only as pseudo-code. Usage of the code is permitted with proper attribution, at the user's risk. This paper develops a framework for modelling risky debt and valuing credit derivatives that is exible and simple to implement, and that is, to the maximum extent possible, based on observables. Our approach is based on expanding the Heath-Jarrow-Morton term-structure model to allow for defaultable debt. We do not follow the procedure of implying out the behavior of spreads from assumptions concerning the default process, instead working directly with the evolution of spreads. We show that risk-neutral drifts in the resulting model possess a recursive representation that particularly facilitates implementation and makes it possible to handle path-dependence and early exercise features without di culty. The framework permits embedding a variety of speci cations for default; we present an empirical example of a default structure which provides promising calibration results. 1

Economic theory tells us that market and credit risks are intrinsically related to each other and not separable. We describe the two main approaches to pricing credit risky instruments: the structural approach and the reduced form approach. It is argued that the standard approaches to credit risk management -- CreditMetrics, CreditRisk+ and KMV -- are of limited value when applied to portfolios of interest rate sensitive instruments and in measuring market and credit risk. Empirically returns on high yield bonds have a higher correlation with equity index returns and a lower correlation with Treasury bond index returns than do low yield bonds. Also, macro economic variables appear to influence the aggregate rate of business failures. The CreditMetrics, CreditRisk+ and KMV methodologies cannot reproduce these empirical observations given their constant interest rate assumption. However, we can incorporate these empirical observations into the reduced form of Jarrow and Turnbull (1995b). Drawing the analogy. Risk 5, 63-70 model. Here default probabilities are correlated due to their dependence on common economic factors.

Abstract not found

This paper empirically examines the relation between the Treasury term structure and spreads of investment grade corporate bond yields over Treasuries. I find that noncallable bond yield spreads fall when the level of the Treasury term structure rises. The extent of this decline depends on the initial credit quality of the bond; the decline is small for Aaarated bonds and large for Baa-rated bonds. The role of the business cycle in generating this pattern is explored, as is the link between yield spreads and default risk. I also argue that yield spreads based on commonly-used bond yield indexes are contaminated in two important ways. The first is that they are "refreshed" indexes, which hold credit ratings constant over time; the second is that they usually are constructed with both callable and noncallable bonds. The impact of both of these problems is examined. JEL Classification: G13 I thank Fischer Black, Ken Singleton and seminar participants at the Federal Reserve Board's Confe...

We develop a structural bond valuation model to simultaneously capture liquidity and credit risk. Our model implies that renegotiation in financial distress is influenced by the illiquidity of the market for distressed debt. As default becomes more likely, the components of bond yield spreads attributable to illiquidity increase. When we consider finite maturity debt, we find decreasing and convex term structures of liquidity spreads. Using bond price data spanning 15 years, we find evidence of a positive correlation between the illiquidity and default componentsofyieldspreadsaswellassupportfordownward-slopingtermstructuresof liquidity spreads. Credit risk and liquidity risk have long been perceived as two of the main justifications for the existence of yield spreads above benchmark Treasury notes or bonds (see Fisher (1959)). Since Merton (1974), a rapidly growing body of literature has focused on credit risk. 1 However, while concern about market liquidity issues has become increasingly marked since the autumn of 1998, 2 liquidity remains a relatively unexplored topic, in particular, liquidity for defaultable securities. 3 This paper develops a structural bond pricing model with liquidity and credit risk. The purpose is to enhance our understanding of both the interaction between these two sources of risk and their relative contributions to the yield spreads on corporate bonds. Throughout the paper, we define liquidity as the ability to sell a security promptly and at a price close to its value in frictionless markets, that is, we think of an illiquid market as one in which a sizeable discount may have to be incurred to achieve immediacy. We model credit risk in a framework that allows for debt renegotiation as in Fan and Sundaresan (2000). Following François and Morellec (2004), we also introduce

Abstract not found

may be undertaken at the user’s risk. We would like to thank an anonymous referee whose suggestions have improved the exposition in the paper. 2 The paper was written while Viral V. Acharya was a doctoral student at the Stern School of Business, New York University. Pricing Credit Derivatives with Rating Transitions We develop a model for pricing risky debt and valuing credit derivatives that is easily calibrated to existing variables. Our approach is based on expanding the Heath-Jarrow-Morton (1990) term-structure model and its extension, the Das-Sundaram (2000) model to allow for defaultable debt with rating transitions. The framework has two salient features, comprising extensions over the earlier work: (i) it employs a rating transition matrix as the driver for the default process, and (ii) the entire set of rating categories is calibrated jointly, allowing, with minimal assumptions, arbitrage-free restrictions across rating classes, as a bond migrates amongst them. We provide an illustration of the approach by applying it to price credit sensitive notes that have coupon payments that are linked to the rating of the underlying credit. 1

We propose an evaluation method for financial assets subject to default risk, when investors face imperfect information about the state variable triggering the default. The model we propose generalizes the one by Duffie and Lando (2001) in the following way: (i) it incorporates informational noise in continuous time, (ii) it respects the (H) hypothesis, (iii) it precludes arbitrage from insiders. The model is sufficiently general to encompass a large class of structural models. In this setting we show that the default time is totally inaccessible in the market’s filtration and derive the martingale hazard process. Finally, we provide pricing formulas for default-sensitive claims and illustrate with particular examples the shapes of the credit spreads and the conditional default probabilities. An important feature of the conditional default probabilities is they are non Markovian. This might shed some light on observed phenomena such as the ”rating momentum”. 1