• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations

Switch-specific and general preparation map onto different ERP components in a task-switching paradigm. Psychophysiology, 2011; 48(4): 559–568 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01115.x PMID: 20718932 (0)

by F Karayanidis, A Provost, S Brown, B Paton, A Heathcote
Add To MetaCart

Tools

Sorted by:
Results 1 - 6 of 6

Dissociable Neural Correlates of Intention and Action Preparation in Voluntary Task Switching

by Edita Poljac, Nick Yeung
"... This electroencephalographic (EEG) study investigated the impact of between-task competition on intentional control in voluntary task switching. Anticipatory preparation for an upcoming task switch is a hallmark of top-down intentional control. Meanwhile, asymmetries in performance and voluntary cho ..."
Abstract - Cited by 1 (0 self) - Add to MetaCart
This electroencephalographic (EEG) study investigated the impact of between-task competition on intentional control in voluntary task switching. Anticipatory preparation for an upcoming task switch is a hallmark of top-down intentional control. Meanwhile, asymmetries in performance and voluntary choice when switching between tasks differing in relative strength reveal the effects of between-task com-petition, reflected in a surprising bias against switching to an easier task. Here, we assessed the impact of this bias on EEG markers of intentional control during preparation for an upcoming task switch. The results revealed strong and varied effects of between-task competition on EEG markers of global task preparation—a frontal con-tingent negative variation (CNV), a posterior slow positive wave, and oscillatory activity in the alpha band (8–12 Hz) over posterior scalp sites. In contrast, we observed no between-task differences in motor-specific task preparation, as indexed by the lateralized readi-ness potential and by motor-related amplitude asymmetries in the mu (9–13 Hz) and beta (18–26 Hz) frequency bands. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that between-task competition directly influ-ences the formation of top-down intentions, not only their expression in overt behavior. Specifically, this influence occurs at the level of global task intention rather than the preparation of specific actions.
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...tion (CNV; Lorist et al. 2000; Astle et al. 2006, 2008; Mueller et al. 2007; Vandamme et al. 2010) and posterior positivity (e.g., Kieffaber and Hetrick 2005; Goffaux et al. 2006; Lavric et al. 2008; =-=Karayanidis et al. 2011-=-) are both enhanced when the task switches compared with when it repeats. In addition, both components show a degree of lateralization: Whereas the CNV is often observed to be more right lateralized, ...

Cerebral Cortex Advance Access published October 26, 2012 Dissociable Neural Correlates of Intention and Action Preparation in Voluntary Task Switching

by Edita Poljac, Nick Yeung
"... This electroencephalographic (EEG) study investigated the impact of between-task competition on intentional control in voluntary task switching. Anticipatory preparation for an upcoming task switch is a hallmark of top-down intentional control. Meanwhile, asymmetries in performance and voluntary cho ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
This electroencephalographic (EEG) study investigated the impact of between-task competition on intentional control in voluntary task switching. Anticipatory preparation for an upcoming task switch is a hallmark of top-down intentional control. Meanwhile, asymmetries in performance and voluntary choice when switching between tasks differing in relative strength reveal the effects of between-task competition, reflected in a surprising bias against switching to an easier task. Here, we assessed the impact of this bias on EEG markers of intentional control during preparation for an upcoming task switch. The results revealed strong and varied effects of between-task competition on EEG markers of global task preparation—a frontal contingent negative variation (CNV), a posterior slow positive wave, and oscillatory activity in the alpha band (8–12 Hz) over posterior scalp sites. In contrast, we observed no between-task differences in motor-specific task preparation, as indexed by the lateralized readiness potential and by motor-related amplitude asymmetries in the mu (9–13 Hz) and beta (18–26 Hz) frequency bands. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that between-task competition directly influences the formation of top-down intentions, not only their expression in overt behavior. Specifically, this influence occurs at the level of global task intention rather than the preparation of specific actions.
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...tion (CNV; Lorist et al. 2000; Astle et al. 2006, 2008; Mueller et al. 2007; Vandamme et al. 2010) and posterior positivity (e.g., Kieffaber and Hetrick 2005; Goffaux et al. 2006; Lavric et al. 2008; =-=Karayanidis et al. 2011-=-) are both enhanced when the task switches compared with when it repeats. In addition, both components show a degree of lateralization: Whereas the CNV is often observed to be more right lateralized, ...

G Model NSY-3840; No. of Pages 6 ARTICLE IN PRESS Neuropsychologia xxx (2010) xxx–xxx

by M. Garcia-garcia A, F. Barceló B, I. C. Clemente A, C. Escera A
"... Contents lists available at ScienceDirect ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Reviewed by:

by Kathrin Cohen Kadosh, Frini Karayanidis, Kathrin Cohen Kadosh , 2012
"... doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00400 Differing processing abilities for specific face properties in mid-childhood and adulthood ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00400 Differing processing abilities for specific face properties in mid-childhood and adulthood
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...t positivity 1 is modulated by cue informativeness (Nicholson et al., 2006; Karayanidis et al., 2009; Jamadar et al., 2010) and is associated with the size of the RT switch cost (Lavric et al., 2008; =-=Karayanidis et al., 2011-=-). It is succeeded by a large frontocentral pre-target negativity that occurs for both switch and repeat trials and peaks at target onset. The cue-locked switch cost positivity has been associated wit...

Spatial and Temporal Attention Modulate the Early Stages of Face Processing: Behavioural Evidence from a Reaching Paradigm

by Genevieve L. Quek, Matthew Finkbeiner , 2013
"... A presently unresolved question within the face perception literature is whether attending to the location of a face modulates face processing (i.e. spatial attention). Opinions on this matter diverge along methodological lines – where neuroimaging studies have observed that the allocation of spatia ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
A presently unresolved question within the face perception literature is whether attending to the location of a face modulates face processing (i.e. spatial attention). Opinions on this matter diverge along methodological lines – where neuroimaging studies have observed that the allocation of spatial attention serves to enhance the neural response to a face, findings from behavioural paradigms suggest face processing is carried out independently of spatial attention. In the present study, we reconcile this divide by using a continuous behavioural response measure that indexes face processing at a temporal resolution not available in discrete behavioural measures (e.g. button press). Using reaching trajectories as our response measure, we observed that although participants were able to process faces both when attended and unattended (as others have found), face processing was not impervious to attentional modulation. Attending to the face conferred clear benefits on sex-classification processes at less than 350ms of stimulus processing time. These findings constitute the first reliable demonstration of the modulatory effects of both spatial and temporal attention on face processing within a behavioural paradigm.
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...ewing Time and x-velocity, we employed a modified version of the Orthogonal Polynomial Trend Analysis (OPTA) procedure developed by Woestenburg [52] and recently adapted by Karayanidis and colleagues =-=[53]-=-. In the present case, the individual trial LiftOff Latencies are used as a covariate in a polynomial regression model of our dependent variable, x-velocity, allowing for a detailed analysis of how re...

RESEARCH ARTICLE Task Uncertainty Can Account for Mixing and Switch Costs in Task-Switching

by Patrick S. Cooper, Paul M. Garrett, Jaime L. Rennie, Frini Karayanidis
"... ☯ These authors contributed equally to this work. ‡ These authors also contributed equally to this work. ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
☯ These authors contributed equally to this work. ‡ These authors also contributed equally to this work.
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...nd repeat trials in mixed-task blocks, may underscore a common process to both the mixing and switch cost. Previous work has shown thatmixing and switch costs are not independent processes (e.g., see =-=[36, 37]-=-). For example, inter-trial interference in mixed-task blocks may account for the magnitude of both switch cost and mixing cost (e.g., [14]). Likewise, working memory processes, such as maintenance of...

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University