Results 1 -
2 of
2
Comparing Mostly-Copying and Mark-Sweep Conservative Collection
- In International Symposium on Memory Management
, 1998
"... Many high-level language compilers generate C code and then invoke a C compiler for code generation. To date, most of these compilers link the resulting code against a conservative mark-sweep garbage collector in order to reclaim unused memory. We introduce a new collector, MCC, based on an extensio ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 24 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Many high-level language compilers generate C code and then invoke a C compiler for code generation. To date, most of these compilers link the resulting code against a conservative mark-sweep garbage collector in order to reclaim unused memory. We introduce a new collector, MCC, based on an extension of mostly-copying collection. We analyze the various design decisions made in MCC and provide a performance comparison to the most widely used conservative mark-sweep collector (the Boehm-DemersWeiser collector). Our results show that a good mostlycopying collector can outperform a mature highly-optimized mark-sweep collector when physical memory is large relative to the live data. A surprising result of our analysis is that cache behavior can have a greater impact on overall performance than either collector time, or allocation code. 1 Overview For almost any language, there are a handful of compilers that generate C [1] as a target language. For instance, Javato -C compilers include T...
Scalable Real-time Parallel Garbage Collection for Symmetric Multiprocessors
, 2001
"... model for garbage collection. ..."

