Results 1  10
of
25
Bayes Factors
, 1995
"... In a 1935 paper, and in his book Theory of Probability, Jeffreys developed a methodology for quantifying the evidence in favor of a scientific theory. The centerpiece was a number, now called the Bayes factor, which is the posterior odds of the null hypothesis when the prior probability on the null ..."
Abstract

Cited by 986 (70 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In a 1935 paper, and in his book Theory of Probability, Jeffreys developed a methodology for quantifying the evidence in favor of a scientific theory. The centerpiece was a number, now called the Bayes factor, which is the posterior odds of the null hypothesis when the prior probability on the null is onehalf. Although there has been much discussion of Bayesian hypothesis testing in the context of criticism of P values, less attention has been given to the Bayes factor as a practical tool of applied statistics. In this paper we review and discuss the uses of Bayes factors in the context of five scientific applications in genetics, sports, ecology, sociology and psychology.
Model selection and accounting for model uncertainty in graphical models using Occam's window
, 1993
"... We consider the problem of model selection and accounting for model uncertainty in highdimensional contingency tables, motivated by expert system applications. The approach most used currently is a stepwise strategy guided by tests based on approximate asymptotic Pvalues leading to the selection o ..."
Abstract

Cited by 265 (46 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We consider the problem of model selection and accounting for model uncertainty in highdimensional contingency tables, motivated by expert system applications. The approach most used currently is a stepwise strategy guided by tests based on approximate asymptotic Pvalues leading to the selection of a single model; inference is then conditional on the selected model. The sampling properties of such a strategy are complex, and the failure to take account of model uncertainty leads to underestimation of uncertainty about quantities of interest. In principle, a panacea is provided by the standard Bayesian formalism which averages the posterior distributions of the quantity of interest under each of the models, weighted by their posterior model probabilities. Furthermore, this approach is optimal in the sense of maximising predictive ability. However, this has not been used in practice because computing the posterior model probabilities is hard and the number of models is very large (often greater than 1011). We argue that the standard Bayesian formalism is unsatisfactory and we propose an alternative Bayesian approach that, we contend, takes full account of the true model uncertainty byaveraging overamuch smaller set of models. An efficient search algorithm is developed for nding these models. We consider two classes of graphical models that arise in expert systems: the recursive causal models and the decomposable
Approximate Bayes Factors and Accounting for Model Uncertainty in Generalized Linear Models
, 1993
"... Ways of obtaining approximate Bayes factors for generalized linear models are described, based on the Laplace method for integrals. I propose a new approximation which uses only the output of standard computer programs such as GUM; this appears to be quite accurate. A reference set of proper priors ..."
Abstract

Cited by 98 (28 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Ways of obtaining approximate Bayes factors for generalized linear models are described, based on the Laplace method for integrals. I propose a new approximation which uses only the output of standard computer programs such as GUM; this appears to be quite accurate. A reference set of proper priors is suggested, both to represent the situation where there is not much prior information, and to assess the sensitivity of the results to the prior distribution. The methods can be used when the dispersion parameter is unknown, when there is overdispersion, to compare link functions, and to compare error distributions and variance functions. The methods can be used to implement the Bayesian approach to accounting for model uncertainty. I describe an application to inference about relative risks in the presence of control factors where model uncertainty is large and important. Software to implement the
How Many Iterations in the Gibbs Sampler?
 In Bayesian Statistics 4
, 1992
"... When the Gibbs sampler is used to estimate posterior distributions (Gelfand and Smith, 1990), the question of how many iterations are required is central to its implementation. When interest focuses on quantiles of functionals of the posterior distribution, we describe an easilyimplemented metho ..."
Abstract

Cited by 97 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
When the Gibbs sampler is used to estimate posterior distributions (Gelfand and Smith, 1990), the question of how many iterations are required is central to its implementation. When interest focuses on quantiles of functionals of the posterior distribution, we describe an easilyimplemented method for determining the total number of iterations required, and also the number of initial iterations that should be discarded to allow for "burnin". The method uses only the Gibbs iterates themselves, and does not, for example, require external specification of characteristics of the posterior density. Here the method is described for the situation where one long run is generated, but it can also be easily applied if there are several runs from different starting points. It also applies more generally to Markov chain Monte Carlo schemes other than the Gibbs sampler. It can also be used when several quantiles are to be estimated, when the quantities of interest are probabilities rath...
Bayes factors and model uncertainty
 DEPARTMENT OF STATISTICS, UNIVERSITY OFWASHINGTON
, 1993
"... In a 1935 paper, and in his book Theory of Probability, Jeffreys developed a methodology for quantifying the evidence in favor of a scientific theory. The centerpiece was a number, now called the Bayes factor, which is the posterior odds of the null hypothesis when the prior probability on the null ..."
Abstract

Cited by 89 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In a 1935 paper, and in his book Theory of Probability, Jeffreys developed a methodology for quantifying the evidence in favor of a scientific theory. The centerpiece was a number, now called the Bayes factor, which is the posterior odds of the null hypothesis when the prior probability on the null is onehalf. Although there has been much discussion of Bayesian hypothesis testing in the context of criticism of Pvalues, less attention has been given to the Bayes factor as a practical tool of applied statistics. In this paper we review and discuss the uses of Bayes factors in the context of five scientific applications. The points we emphasize are: from Jeffreys's Bayesian point of view, the purpose of hypothesis testing is to evaluate the evidence in favor of a scientific theory; Bayes factors offer a way of evaluating evidence in favor ofa null hypothesis; Bayes factors provide a way of incorporating external information into the evaluation of evidence about a hypothesis; Bayes factors are very general, and do not require alternative models to be nested; several techniques are available for computing Bayes factors, including asymptotic approximations which are easy to compute using the output from standard packages that maximize likelihoods; in "nonstandard " statistical models that do not satisfy common regularity conditions, it can be technically simpler to calculate Bayes factors than to derive nonBayesian significance
Bayesian model selection in structural equation models
, 1993
"... A Bayesian approach to model selection for structural equation models is outlined. This enables us to compare individual models, nested or nonnested, and also to search through the (perhaps vast) set of possible models for the best ones. The approach selects several models rather than just one, whe ..."
Abstract

Cited by 31 (10 self)
 Add to MetaCart
A Bayesian approach to model selection for structural equation models is outlined. This enables us to compare individual models, nested or nonnested, and also to search through the (perhaps vast) set of possible models for the best ones. The approach selects several models rather than just one, when appropriate, and so enables us to take account, both informally and formally, of uncertainty about model structure when making inferences about quantities of interest. The approach tends to select simpler models than strategies based on multiple Pvaluebased tests. It may thus help to overcome the criticism of structural
The Great Equalizer? Consumer Choice Behavior at Internet Shopbots
 SLOAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT, MIT
, 2000
"... Our research empirically analyzes consumer behavior at Internet shopbots — sites that allow consumers to make “oneclick ” price comparisons for product offerings from multiple retailers. By allowing researchers to observe exactly what information the consumer is shown and their search behavior in r ..."
Abstract

Cited by 31 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Our research empirically analyzes consumer behavior at Internet shopbots — sites that allow consumers to make “oneclick ” price comparisons for product offerings from multiple retailers. By allowing researchers to observe exactly what information the consumer is shown and their search behavior in response to this information, shopbot data has unique strengths for analyzing consumer behavior. Furthermore, the method in which the data is displayed to consumers lends itself to a utilitybased evaluation process, consistent with econometric analysis techniques. While price is an important determinant of customer choice, we find that, even among shopbot consumers, branded retailers and retailers a consumer visited previously hold significant price advantages in headtohead price comparisons. Further, customers are very sensitive to how the total price is allocated among the item price, the shipping cost, and tax, and are also quite sensitive to the ordinal ranking of retailer offerings with respect to price. We also find that consumers use brand as a proxy for a retailer’s credibility with regard to noncontractible aspects of the product bundle such as shipping time. In each case our models accurately predict consumer behavior out of sample, suggesting
The Number of Iterations, Convergence Diagnostics and Generic Metropolis Algorithms
 In Practical Markov Chain Monte Carlo (W.R. Gilks, D.J. Spiegelhalter and
, 1995
"... Introduction In order to use Markov chain Monte Carlo, MCMC, it is necessary to determine how long the simulation needs to be run. It is also a good idea to discard a number of initial "burnin " simulations, since from an arbitrary starting point it would be unlikely that the initial simu ..."
Abstract

Cited by 30 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Introduction In order to use Markov chain Monte Carlo, MCMC, it is necessary to determine how long the simulation needs to be run. It is also a good idea to discard a number of initial "burnin " simulations, since from an arbitrary starting point it would be unlikely that the initial simulations came from the stationary distribution intended for the Markov chain. Also, consecutive simulations from Markov chains are dependent, sometimes highly so. Since saving all simulations can require a large amount of storage, researchers using MCMC sometimes prefer saving only every third, fifth, tenth, etc. simulation, especially if the chain is highly dependent. This is sometimes referred to as thinning the chain. While neither burnin nor thinning are mandatory practices, they both reduce the amount of data saved from a MCMC run. In this chapter, we outline a way of determining in advance the number of iterations needed for a given level of precision in a MCMC algorithm.
Change point and change curve modeling in stochastic processes and spatial statistics
, 1993
"... ..."
Bayesian Selection of LogLinear Models
 Canadian Journal of Statistics
, 1995
"... A general methodology is presented for finding suitable Poisson loglinear models with applications to multiway contingency tables. Mixtures of multivariate normal distributions are used to model prior opinion when a subset of the regression vector is believed to be nonzero. This prior distribution ..."
Abstract

Cited by 7 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
A general methodology is presented for finding suitable Poisson loglinear models with applications to multiway contingency tables. Mixtures of multivariate normal distributions are used to model prior opinion when a subset of the regression vector is believed to be nonzero. This prior distribution is studied for two and threeway contingency tables, in which the regression coefficients are interpretable in terms of oddsratios in the table. Efficient and accurate schemes are proposed for calculating the posterior model probabilities. The methods are illustrated for a large number of twoway simulated tables and for two threeway tables. These methods appear to be useful in selecting the best loglinear model and in estimating parameters of interest that reflect uncertainty in the true model. Key words and phrases: Bayes factors, Laplace method, Gibbs sampling, Model selection, Odds ratios. AMS subject classifications: Primary 62H17, 62F15, 62J12. 1 Introduction 1.1 Bayesian testing...