Results 1 
9 of
9
A thread of HOL development
 Computer Journal
"... The HOL system is a mechanized proof assistant for higher order logic that has been under continuous development since the mid1980s, by an everchanging group of developers and external contributors. We give a brief overview of various implementations of the HOL logic before focusing on the evoluti ..."
Abstract

Cited by 13 (7 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The HOL system is a mechanized proof assistant for higher order logic that has been under continuous development since the mid1980s, by an everchanging group of developers and external contributors. We give a brief overview of various implementations of the HOL logic before focusing on the evolution of certain important features available in a recent implementation. We also illustrate how the module system of Standard ML provided security and modularity in the construction of the HOL kernel, as well as serving in a separate capacity as a useful representation medium for persistent, hierarchical logical theories.
A Mechanized Theory of the picalculus in HOL
, 1992
"... : The ßcalculus is a process algebra for modelling concurrent systems in which the pattern of communication between processes may change over time. This paper describes the results of preliminary work on a definitional formal theory of the ßcalculus in higher order logic using the HOL theorem prov ..."
Abstract

Cited by 11 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
: The ßcalculus is a process algebra for modelling concurrent systems in which the pattern of communication between processes may change over time. This paper describes the results of preliminary work on a definitional formal theory of the ßcalculus in higher order logic using the HOL theorem prover. The ultimate goal of this work is to provide practical mechanized support for reasoning with the ßcalculus about applications. Introduction The ßcalculus [17, 18] is a process algebra proposed by Milner, Parrow and Walker for modelling concurrent systems in which the pattern of interconnection between processes may change over time. This paper describes work on a mechanized formal theory of the ßcalculus in higher order logic using the HOL theorem prover [8]. The main aim of this work is to construct a practical and sound theoremproving tool to support reasoning about applications using the ßcalculus, as well as metatheoretic reasoning about the ßcalculus itself. Four general prin...
A Verification Tool for ValuePassing Processes
 In Proceedings of 13 th International Symposium on Protocol Speci Testing and Veri IFIP Transactions. NorthHolland
, 1993
"... A proof system is described which is capable of handling processes with valuepassing. It implements inference systems that treats data and boolean expressions symbolically. Users are allowed to define the syntax and axioms for their own calculi. Proofs are performed by either invoking proof rules or ..."
Abstract

Cited by 10 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
A proof system is described which is capable of handling processes with valuepassing. It implements inference systems that treats data and boolean expressions symbolically. Users are allowed to define the syntax and axioms for their own calculi. Proofs are performed by either invoking proof rules or applying equational axioms as rewrite rules. Help facilities are provided to make it easier to conduct proofs. Keyword Codes: D.1.3; D.2.2; D.2.4 Keywords: Programming Techniques, Concurrent Programming; Software Engineering, Tools and Techniques; Program Verification 1 Introduction Both CSP [Hoa85] and CCS [Mil89] were originally proposed as languages for describing systems of processes which can run in parallel and cooperate with each other by transmitting data through communication channels. But in the subsequent years the aspect of data transmition has been somewhat neglected, and "pure" versions of these calculi, socalled process algebras, have been studied extensively, in wh...
Analysis of a Guard Condition in Type Theory
, 1997
"... We present a realizability interpretation of coinductive types based on partial equivalence relations (per's). We extract from the per's interpretation sound rules to type recursive definitions. These recursive definitions are needed to introduce "infinite" and "total" ..."
Abstract

Cited by 5 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We present a realizability interpretation of coinductive types based on partial equivalence relations (per's). We extract from the per's interpretation sound rules to type recursive definitions. These recursive definitions are needed to introduce "infinite" and "total" objects of coinductive type such as an infinite stream or a nonterminating process. We show that the proposed type system enjoys the basic syntactic properties of subject reduction and strong normalization with respect to a confluent rewriting system first studied by Gimenez. We also compare the proposed type system with those studied by Coquand and Gimenez. In particular, we provide a semantic reconstruction of Gimenez's system which suggests a rule to type nested recursive definitions.
Verification of LOTOS Specifications using Term Rewriting Techniques
, 1994
"... Recently the use of formal methods in describing and analysing the behaviour of (computer) systems has become more common. This has resulted in the proliferation of a wide variety of different specification formalisms, together with analytical techniques and methodologies for specification developme ..."
Abstract

Cited by 2 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Recently the use of formal methods in describing and analysing the behaviour of (computer) systems has become more common. This has resulted in the proliferation of a wide variety of different specification formalisms, together with analytical techniques and methodologies for specification development. The particular specification formalism adopted for this study is LOTOS, an ISO standard formal description technique. Although there are many works dealing with how to write LOTOS specifications and how to develop a LOTOS specification from the initial abstract requirements specification to concrete implementation, relatively few works are concerned with the problems of expressing and proving the correctness of LOTOS specifications, i.e. verification. The main objective of this thesis is to address this shortfall by investigating the meaning of verification as it relates to concurrent systems in general, and in particular to those systems described using LOTOS. Further goals are to autom...
Algebraic Proof Assistants in HOL
 1 OS5 ) .I. P~~JK Cltertr. 89. 5767577 1 . Pri
, 1995
"... We explore several ways to formalize the algebraic laws of CSPlike languages in HOL. The intent of the paper is to show how HOL can be tailored to acting as a proof assistant. The emphasis is therefore on the consequences of various choices to be made during the formalization for writing tactics. W ..."
Abstract

Cited by 2 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
We explore several ways to formalize the algebraic laws of CSPlike languages in HOL. The intent of the paper is to show how HOL can be tailored to acting as a proof assistant. The emphasis is therefore on the consequences of various choices to be made during the formalization for writing tactics. We end up with a proof assistant that allows a user to make steps of the granularity of an algebraic law. It is not the purpose of this paper to show in HOL that the algebraic laws of some CSPlike language are sound; the purpose is to show how HOL can be used to apply the algebraic laws and act as a rewrite system. 0 Introduction We report on our attempts to tailor the automated proof checker HOL [GM93] to the verification of proofs in CSPlike process algebras. Although it is technically feasible to prove the correctness of processes operating in parallel, this is often a long and tedious, and therefore extremely errorprone task. Reliable tools that can assist in proving concurrent progra...
An Instruction Set Process Calculus
"... We have created a calculus for reasoning about hardware and firmware at the algorithmic state machine (ASM) and instructionset processor (ISP) levels of description. The calculus is a valuepassing process algebra that extends the Mealy machine model to include parallel composition. It supports rea ..."
Abstract
 Add to MetaCart
We have created a calculus for reasoning about hardware and firmware at the algorithmic state machine (ASM) and instructionset processor (ISP) levels of description. The calculus is a valuepassing process algebra that extends the Mealy machine model to include parallel composition. It supports reasoning about the composed behavior of synchronous ASM and ISP components and microcode. We present an overview of the calculus and its application including an example showing the equivalence of a microcoded machine to its target instruction set specified by both ASM and ISP descriptions. The calculus, its properties, and the examples have been deeply embedded, proved, and verified as conservative extensions to the logic of the Higher Order Logic (HOL90) theorem prover.
PROSPER: LTR 26241 Chapter in PROSPER Book An Implementation of Higher Order Logic
, 2001
"... Abstract We discuss a recent implementation of a mechanized proof assistant for the higher orderlogic known as HOL. We first describe highlevel specification and proof facilities provided by the system, and then cover some details of the implementation. We explain how themodule system of Standard M ..."
Abstract
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract We discuss a recent implementation of a mechanized proof assistant for the higher orderlogic known as HOL. We first describe highlevel specification and proof facilities provided by the system, and then cover some details of the implementation. We explain how themodule system of Standard ML provided security and modularity in the construction of the HOL kernel, as well as serving in a separate capacity as a useful representation medium forpersistent, hierarchical logical theories.
1 Introduction From LCF to HOL: a short history
"... The original LCF system was a proofchecking program developed at Stanford University by Robin Milner in 1972. Descendents of LCF now form a thriving ..."
Abstract
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
The original LCF system was a proofchecking program developed at Stanford University by Robin Milner in 1972. Descendents of LCF now form a thriving