This document is an Internet-Draft. Internet-Drafts are working

A solution to the problem of speech recognition with signals distorted by low-bit rate coders is presented in this paper. A model for the coding-decoding distortion, a HMM compensation method to include this model, and an EM-based adaptation algorithm to estimate this distortion are proposed here. Medium vocabulary continuous-speech speaker-independent recognition experiments with 8 kbps G.729(CS-CELP), 13 kbps RPE-LTP (GSM), 5.3 kbps G723.1, 4.8 kbps FS-1016 and 32 kbps G.726(ADPCM) coders show that the approach described in this paper is able to dramatically reduce the effect of the coding distortion and, in some cases, gives a word accuracy higher than the baseline system with uncoded speech. Finally, the EM estimation algorithm requires only one adapting utterance and the approach described is certainly The evolution and popularity of cellular and TCP/IP networks has created the problem of improving the recognition accuracy for speech distorted by low-bit rate coders. The distortion of coding schemes in speech recognizers is difficult to model and is an open problem that cannot be solved by applying conventional noise cancelling techniques [1] such as spectral subtraction [2], cepstral mean subtraction [3] and RASTA

We propose a visual language, Hyperflow, for system programming as well as for end user shell programming. Hyperflow is designed for a multimedia pen computer system for children. It is a dataflow-based graphical language similar to Show and Tell. In order to demonstrate the capability of Hyperflow, we solve the programming problem of implementing a help command for children to telephone their instructor or parents using voice communication hardware (modem, microphone, speaker, and a clock). The resulting program includes visual programs to implement device drivers for the modem and clock hardware. 1. Introduction In his keynote speech to the 4th UIST Symposium van Dam urged the unification of the user interface and the application [van Dam 91]. There are two aspects to be considered: First, the user interface and the application must be more tightly coupled, i.e., the user interface needs more "semantic feedback" from the application. Second, there should be a single environment for ...

This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress". The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at

This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress". The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at

This document is an Internet-Draft. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as ‘‘work in progress’’. To learn the current status of any Internet-Draft, please check the ‘‘1id-abstracts.txt’ ’ listing contained in the Internet-Drafts Shadow Directories on ftp.is.co.za (Africa), nic.nordu.net (Europe), munnari.oz.au (Pacific Rim), ds.internic.net (US East Coast), or ftp.isi.edu (US West Coast). Distribution of this document is unlimited.

This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress". The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at

This document is an Internet-Draft. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as ‘‘work in progress’’. To view the entire list of current Internet-Drafts, please check the ‘‘1id-abstracts.txt’ ’ listing contained in the Internet-Drafts Shadow Directories on ftp.is.co.za (Africa), ftp.nordu.net (Northern Europe), ftp.nis.garr.it (Southern Europe), munnari.oz.au (Pacific Rim), ftp.ietf.org (US East Coast), or ftp.isi.edu (US West Coast). Distribution of this document is unlimited.

This document is an Internet-Draft. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as ‘‘work in progress’’. To learn the current status of any Internet-Draft, please check the ‘‘1id-abstracts.txt’ ’ listing contained in the Internet-Drafts Shadow Directories on ftp.is.co.za (Africa), nic.nordu.net (Europe), munnari.oz.au (Pacific Rim), ds.internic.net (US East Coast), or ftp.isi.edu (US West Coast). Distribution of this document is unlimited.

This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress". The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at