Results 1 
3 of
3
TimeSpace Tradeoffs for Satisfiability
 Journal of Computer and System Sciences
, 1997
"... We give the first nontrivial modelindependent timespace tradeoffs for satisfiability. Namely, we show that SAT cannot be solved simultaneously in n 1+o(1) time and n 1\Gammaffl space for any ffl ? 0 on general randomaccess nondeterministic Turing machines. In particular, SAT cannot be solved ..."
Abstract

Cited by 29 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We give the first nontrivial modelindependent timespace tradeoffs for satisfiability. Namely, we show that SAT cannot be solved simultaneously in n 1+o(1) time and n 1\Gammaffl space for any ffl ? 0 on general randomaccess nondeterministic Turing machines. In particular, SAT cannot be solved deterministically by a Turing machine using quasilinear time and p n space. We also give lower bounds for logspace uniform NC 1 circuits and branching programs. Our proof uses two basic ideas. First we show that if SAT can be solved nondeterministically with a small amount of time then we can collapse a nonconstant number of levels of the polynomialtime hierarchy. We combine this work with a result of Nepomnjascii that shows that a nondeterministic computation of super linear time and sublinear space can be simulated in alternating linear time. A simple diagonalization yields our main result. We discuss how these bounds lead to a new approach to separating the complexity classes NL a...
ResourceBounded Kolmogorov Complexity Revisited
 In Proceedings of the 14th Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science
, 2001
"... We take a fresh look at CD complexity, where CD (x) is the size of the smallest program that distinguishes x from all other strings in time t(jxj). We also look at CND complexity, a new nondeterministic variant of CD complexity, and timebounded Kolmogorov complexity, denoted by C complexity. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 25 (7 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We take a fresh look at CD complexity, where CD (x) is the size of the smallest program that distinguishes x from all other strings in time t(jxj). We also look at CND complexity, a new nondeterministic variant of CD complexity, and timebounded Kolmogorov complexity, denoted by C complexity.
Nondeterministic Polynomial Time versus Nondeterministic Logarithmic Space
 In Proceedings, Twelfth Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity
, 1996
"... We discuss the possibility of using the relatively old technique of diagonalization to separate complexity classes, in particular NL from NP. We show several results in this direction. ffl Any nonconstant level of the polynomialtime hierarchy strictly contains NL. ffl SAT is not simultaneously in ..."
Abstract

Cited by 22 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We discuss the possibility of using the relatively old technique of diagonalization to separate complexity classes, in particular NL from NP. We show several results in this direction. ffl Any nonconstant level of the polynomialtime hierarchy strictly contains NL. ffl SAT is not simultaneously in NL and deterministic n log j n time for any j. ffl On the negative side, we present a relativized world where P = NP but any nonconstant level of the polynomialtime hierarchy differs from P. 1 Introduction Separating complexity classes remains the most important and difficult of problems in theoretical computer science. Circuit complexity and other techniques on finite functions have seen some exciting early successes (see the survey of Boppana and Sipser [BS90]) but have yet to achieve their promise of separating complexity classes above logarithmic space. Other techniques based on logic and geometry also have given us separations only on very restricted models. We should turn back to...