Results 11 - 20
of
141
Feature Logics
- HANDBOOK OF LOGIC AND LANGUAGE, EDITED BY VAN BENTHEM & TER MEULEN
, 1994
"... Feature logics form a class of specialized logics which have proven especially useful in classifying and constraining the linguistic objects known as feature structures. Linguistically, these structures have their origin in the work of the Prague school of linguistics, followed by the work of Chom ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 32 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Feature logics form a class of specialized logics which have proven especially useful in classifying and constraining the linguistic objects known as feature structures. Linguistically, these structures have their origin in the work of the Prague school of linguistics, followed by the work of Chomsky and Halle in The Sound Pattern of English [16]. Feature structures have been reinvented several times by computer scientists: in the theory of data structures, where they are known as record structures, in artificial intelligence, where they are known as frame or slot-value structures, in the theory of data bases, where they are called "complex objects", and in computati
A Compositional Logic for Polymorphic Higher-Order Functions
- PPDP'04
, 2004
"... This paper introduces a compositional program logic for higherorder polymorphic functions and standard data types. The logic enables us to reason about observable properties of polymorphic programs starting from those of their constituents. Just as types attached to programs offer information on the ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 23 (10 self)
- Add to MetaCart
This paper introduces a compositional program logic for higherorder polymorphic functions and standard data types. The logic enables us to reason about observable properties of polymorphic programs starting from those of their constituents. Just as types attached to programs offer information on their composability so as to guarantee basic safety of composite programs, formulae of the proposed logic attached to programs offer information on their composability so as to guarantee fine-grained behavioural properties of polymorphic programs. The central feature of the logic is a systematic usage of names and operations on them, whose origin is in the logics for typed π-calculi. The paper introduces the program logic and its proof rules and illustrates their usage by non-trivial reasoning examples, taking a prototypical call-by-value functional language with impredicative polymorphism and recursive types as a target language.
Topological Incompleteness and Order Incompleteness of the Lambda Calculus
- ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL LOGIC
, 2001
"... A model of the untyped lambda calculus induces a lambda theory, i.e., a congruence relation on λ-terms closed under ff- and fi-conversion. A semantics (= class of models) of the lambda calculus is incomplete if there exists a lambda theory which is not induced by any model in the semantics. In th ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 21 (14 self)
- Add to MetaCart
A model of the untyped lambda calculus induces a lambda theory, i.e., a congruence relation on λ-terms closed under ff- and fi-conversion. A semantics (= class of models) of the lambda calculus is incomplete if there exists a lambda theory which is not induced by any model in the semantics. In this paper we introduce a new technique to prove the incompleteness of a wide range of lambda calculus semantics, including the strongly stable one, whose incompleteness had been conjectured by Bastonero-Gouy [6, 7] and by Berline [9]. The main results of the paper are a topological incompleteness theorem and an order incompleteness theorem. In the first one we show the incompleteness of the lambda calculus semantics given in terms of topological models whose topology satisfies a property of connectedness. In the second one we prove the incompleteness of the class of partially ordered models with finitely many connected components w.r.t. the Alexandroff topology. A further result of the paper is a proof of the completeness of the semantics of the lambda calculus given in terms of topological models whose topology is non-trivial and metrizable.
Specification Structures and Propositions-as-Types for Concurrency
- Logics for Concurrency: Structure vs. Automata---Proceedings of the VIIIth Banff Higher Order Workshop, volume 1043 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science
, 1995
"... Many different notions of "property of interest" and methods of verifying such properties arise naturally in programming. A general framework of "Specification Structures" is presented for combining different notions and methods in a coherent fashion. This is then applied to concurrency in the se ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 21 (5 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Many different notions of "property of interest" and methods of verifying such properties arise naturally in programming. A general framework of "Specification Structures" is presented for combining different notions and methods in a coherent fashion. This is then applied to concurrency in the setting of Interaction Categories.
A Fully Abstract Semantics for a Concurrent Functional Language With Monadic Types
, 1995
"... This paper presents a typed higher-order concurrent functional programming language, based on Moggi's monadic metalanguage and Reppy's Concurrent ML. We present an operational semantics for the language, and show that a higherorder variant of the traces model is fully abstract for maytesting. This p ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 20 (4 self)
- Add to MetaCart
This paper presents a typed higher-order concurrent functional programming language, based on Moggi's monadic metalanguage and Reppy's Concurrent ML. We present an operational semantics for the language, and show that a higherorder variant of the traces model is fully abstract for maytesting. This proof uses a program logic based on Hennessy-- Milner logic and Abramsky's domain theory in logical form. 1 Introduction This paper presents an operational semantics for a concurrent functional programming language, based on Reppy's [26, 27] Concurrent ML, and Moggi's [22] monadic metalanguage. CML is a concurrent extension of New Jersey ML, which adds communication primitives based on CCS [19] and CSP [11]. Reppy introduces a new type constructor of events, which can spawn concurrent processes, and communicate with them along channels. Three of the constructors for the event type are: always : a#aevent wrap : (aeventa#b)# (bevent) sync : aevent#a These are: . alwayse is an event whic...
A Cook’s tour of the finitary non-well-founded sets
- Invited Lecture at BCTCS
, 1988
"... It is a great pleasure to contribute this paper to a birthday volume for Dov. Dov and I arrived at imperial College at around the same time, and soon he, Tom Maibaum and I were embarked on a joint project, the Handbook of Logic in Computer Science. We obtained a generous advance from Oxford Universi ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 18 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
It is a great pleasure to contribute this paper to a birthday volume for Dov. Dov and I arrived at imperial College at around the same time, and soon he, Tom Maibaum and I were embarked on a joint project, the Handbook of Logic in Computer Science. We obtained a generous advance from Oxford University Press, and a grant from the Alvey Programme, which allowed us to develop the Handbook in a rather unique, interactive way. We held regular meetings at Cosener’s House in Abingdon (a facility run by what was then the U.K. Science and Engineering Research Council), at which contributors would present their ideas and draft material for their chapters for discussion and criticism. Ideas for new chapters and the balance of the volumes were also discussed. Those were a remarkable series of meetings — a veritable education in themselves. I must confess that during this long process, I did occasionally wonder if it would ever terminate.... But the record shows that five handsome volumes were produced [6]. Moreover, I believe that the Handbook has proved to be a really valuable resource for students and researchers. It has been used as the basis for a number of summer schools. Many of the chapters have become standard references for their topics. In a field with rapidly changing fashions, most of the material has stood the test of time — thus
Topical Categories of Domains
, 1997
"... this paper are algebraic dcpos, and many of the points discussed here will be needed later in the special case. 2 They provide a simple example to illustrate the "Display categories" in Section 3.2 ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 17 (16 self)
- Add to MetaCart
this paper are algebraic dcpos, and many of the points discussed here will be needed later in the special case. 2 They provide a simple example to illustrate the "Display categories" in Section 3.2
Reasoning about Higher-Order Processes
, 1994
"... We address the specification and verification problem for process calculi such as Chocs, CML and Facile where processes or functions are transmissible values. Our work takes place in the context of a static treatment of restriction and of a bisimulation-based semantics. As a paradigmatic and simple ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 17 (8 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We address the specification and verification problem for process calculi such as Chocs, CML and Facile where processes or functions are transmissible values. Our work takes place in the context of a static treatment of restriction and of a bisimulation-based semantics. As a paradigmatic and simple case we concentrate on (Plain) Chocs. We show that Chocs bisimulation can be characterized by an extension of Hennessy-Milner logic including a constructive implication, or function space constructor. This result is a non-trivial extension of the classical characterization result for labelled transition systems. In the second part of the paper we address the problem of developing a proof system for the verification of process specifications. Building on previous work for CCS we present an infinitary sound and complete proof system for the fragment of the calculus not handling restriction. Keywords: Higher-order process calculi; Bisimulation; Modal logics; Program specification; Program verif...
Graph lambda theories
- Journal of Logic and Computation
, 2004
"... Lambda theories are equational extensions of the untyped lambda calculus that are closed under derivation. The set of lambda theories is naturally equipped with a structure of complete lattice, where the meet of a family of lambda theories is their intersection, and the join is the least lambda theo ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 17 (10 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Lambda theories are equational extensions of the untyped lambda calculus that are closed under derivation. The set of lambda theories is naturally equipped with a structure of complete lattice, where the meet of a family of lambda theories is their intersection, and the join is the least lambda theory containing their union. In this paper we study the structure of the lattice of lambda theories by universal algebraic methods. We show that nontrivial quasi-identities in the language of lattices hold in the lattice of lambda theories, while every nontrivial lattice identity fails in the lattice of lambda theories if the language of lambda calculus is enriched by a suitable finite number of constants. We also show that there exists a sublattice of the lattice of lambda theories which satisfies: (i) a restricted form of distributivity, called meet semidistributivity; and (ii) a nontrivial identity in the language of lattices enriched by the relative product of binary relations.

