Abstract not found

This paper reviews the theory and evidence regarding the impact of taxation on corporate financial policy. Starting from a basic characterization of the classical corporate income tax and its effects, the analysis focuses on three areas of research: equity policy, debt-equity decisions, and choices regarding ownership structure and organizational form. The discussion stresses the distinction between nominal and more fundamental financial differences for example, in the relationship between borrowing and leasing and that financial policy involves choices not only among different underlying policies but also among characterizations of a given policy. The final section offers some brief reflections on the implications of continuing financial innovation.

Using a unique dataset of East Asian non-financial companies, this paper examines a firm's choice between local currency, foreign currency, and synthetic local currency (hedged foreign currency) debt. We also exploit the Asian financial crisis of 1997 as a natural experiment to investigate the role of debt type in financial and operating performance. We find evidence of unique, as well as common, factors that determine each debt type's use thus indicating the importance of examining debt at a disaggregated level. Specifically, the use of natural local currency debt is associated primarily with factors found by many other studies to determine total debt levels such as size, profitability, and the market-to-book ratio. Foreign currency debt is used as a complement to local currency debt by firms with substantial capital needs seeking to lower the cost or extend the maturity structure of debt. However, the use of foreign currency debt is also determined by asset and income type consistent with agency cost and financial risk management theories. The use of synthetic local debt is primarily determined by risk management concerns. Finally, contrary to anecdotal reports and existing theory, we find no evidence that unhedged foreign currency debt is associated with significantly worse performance during the Asian crisis. Surprisingly, the use of synthetic local currency debt is associated with the biggest drop in market value, possibly due to currency derivative market illiquidity during the crisis.

The statistical analysis of firm-level data on U.S. multinational companies was conducted at the International Investment Division, Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce under arrangements that maintain legal confidentiality requirements. The views expressed are those of the authors

This paper examines the impact of the U.S. Tax Reform Act of 1986 (TRA) on international joint ventures by American firms. The TRA mandates the use of separate ‘‘baskets’ ’ in calculating foreign tax credits on dividends received from each foreign corporation owned 50 % or less by Americans – which greatly reduces the attractiveness of joint ventures, especially those in low-tax foreign countries. Since the effect of the TRA on joint ventures varies with foreign tax rates, the country-level pattern of subsequent joint venture activity illustrates the sensitivity of organizational form to tax considerations. The evidence indicates that American participation in international joint ventures fell sharply after 1986, particularly in low-tax countries. Moreover, joint ventures in low-tax countries use more debt and pay greater royalties to their American parents after 1986, reflecting their incentives to economize on dividend payments. © 1999 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved.

Abstract not found

helpful comments and Marie Tomarelli for research assistance. Optimality of the Foreign Tax Credit System: Separate vs. Overall Limitations Foreign tax credit systems limit the extent to which foreign tax credits can be used to offset tax liability in the taxpayer’s home country. We examine how two methods of limiting foreign tax credits, separate limitations based on type or source of income or an overall limitation aggregating across all foreign income, affect the optimal allocation of capital. We show that when investment opportunities exist in both low-tax and high-tax countries, a separate limitation method will always result in an inefficient allocation of capital. In some circumstances, an overall limitation can result in the optimal allocation of capital. In other cases, both limitation methods will result in an inefficient allocation of capital. In these cases either limitation method can be relatively more efficient. Simulations show that the potential differences in economic welfare under the alternative limitation methods can be significant. We consider the limitation methods in multiple settings, including the presence of pre-existing foreign income and allocation rules, such as interest allocation.