This paper explores a new point in the design space of formal reasoning systems - part programming language, part logical framework. The system is built on a programming language where the user expresses equality constraints between types and the type checker then enforces these constraints. This simple extension to the type system allows the programmer to describe properties of his program in the types of witness objects which can be thought of as concrete evidence that the program has the property desired. These techniques and two other rich typing mechanisms, rank-N polymorphism and extensible kinds, create a powerful new programming idiom for writing programs whose types enforce semantic properties. A language with these features is both a practical programming language and a logic. This marriage between two previously separate entities increases the probability that users will apply formal methods to their programming designs. This kind of synthesis creates the foundations for the languages of the future.

The paper addresses theoretical and practical aspects of implementing multi-stage languages using abstract syntax trees (ASTs), gensym, and reflection. We present an operational account of the correctness of this approach, and report on our experience with a bytecode compiler called MetaOCaml that is based on this strategy. Current performance measurements reveal interesting characteristics of the underlying OCaml compiler, and illustrate why this strategy can be particularly useful for implementing domain-specific languages in a typed, functional setting.

Environment classifiers were proposed as a new approach to typing multi-stage languages. Safety was established in the simply-typed and let-polymorphic settings. While the motivation for classifiers was the feasibility of inference, this was in fact not established. This paper starts with the observation that inference for the full classifier-based system fails. We then identify a subset of the original system for which inference is possible. This subset, which uses implicit classifiers, retains significant expressivity (e.g. it can embed the calculi of Davies and Pfenning) and eliminates the need for classifier names in terms. Implicit classifiers were implemented in MetaOCaml, and no changes were needed to make an existing test suite acceptable by the new type checker.

3 A complete example

By allowing the programmer to write code that can generate code at run-time, meta-programming offers a powerful approach to program construction. For instance, meta-programming can often be employed to enhance program efficiency and facilitate the construction of generic programs. However, meta-programming, especially in an untyped setting, is notoriously error-prone. In this paper, we aim at making meta-programming less error-prone by providing a type system to facilitate the construction of correct meta-programs. We first introduce some code constructors for constructing typeful code representation in which program variables are replaced with deBruijn indices, and then formally demonstrate how such typeful code representation can be used to support meta-programming. The main contribution of the paper lies in recognition and then formalization of a novel approach to typed meta-programming that is practical, general and flexible.

We describe a metalanguage MMML, which makes explicit the order of evaluation (in the spirit of monadic metalanguages) and the staging of computations (as in languages for multi-level binding-time analysis). The main contribution of the paper is an operational semantics which is sufficiently detailed for analyzing subtle aspects of multi-stage programming, but also intuitive enough to serve as a reference semantics. For instance, the separation of computational types from code types, makes clear the distinction between a computation for generating code and the generated code, and provides a basis for multi-lingual extensions, where a variety of programming languages (aka monads) coexist. The operational semantics consists of two parts: local (semantics preserving) simplification rules, and computation steps executed in a deterministic order (because they may have side-effects). We focus on the computational aspects, thus we adopt a simple type system, that can detect usual type errors, but not the unresolved link errors. Because of its explicit annotations, MMML is suitable as an intermediate language.

This paper describes the design and the semantics of MetaKlaim, an higher order distributed process calculus equipped with staging mechanisms. MetaKlaim integrates MetaML (an extension of SML for multi-stage programming) and Klaim (a Kernel Language for Agents Interaction and Mobility), to permit interleaving of meta-programming activities (like assembly and linking of code fragments), dynamic checking of security policies at administrative boundaries and "traditional" computational activities on a wide area network (like remote communication and code mobility). MetaKlaim exploits a powerful type system (including polymorphic types a la system F) to deal with highly parameterized mobile components and to dynamically enforce security policies: types are metadata which are extracted from code at run-time and are used to express trustiness guarantees.

This article presents a polymorphic modal type system and its principal type inference algorithm that conservatively extend ML by all of Lisp’s staging constructs (the quasi-quotation system). The combination is meaningful because ML is a practical higher-order, impure, and typed language, while Lisp’s quasi-quotation system has long evolved complying with the demands from multi-staged programming practices. Our type system supports open code, unrestricted operations on references, intentional variable-capturing substitution as well as capture-avoiding substitution, and lifting values into code, whose combination escaped all the previous systems.

Staging is a programming technique for dividing the computation in order to exploit the early availability of some arguments. In the early stages the program uses the available arguments to generate, at run time, the code for the late stages. The late stages may then be explicitly evaluated when appropriate. A type system for staging should ensure that only well-typed expressions are generated, and that only expressions with no free variables are permitted for evaluation.

We present a calculus for modelling "environment-aware" computations, that is computations that adapt their behaviour according to the capabilities of the environment. The calculus is an imperative, object-based language with extensible objects, equipped with a labelled transition semantics. A notion of bisimulation, lifting to computations a correspondence between the capabilities of di#erent environments, is provided. Bisimulation can be used to prove that a program is "cross-environment", i.e., it has the same behaviour when run in di#erent environments. 1