Results 1 
3 of
3
Specification Structures and PropositionsasTypes for Concurrency
 Logics for Concurrency: Structure vs. AutomataProceedings of the VIIIth Banff Higher Order Workshop, volume 1043 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science
, 1995
"... Many different notions of "property of interest" and methods of verifying such properties arise naturally in programming. A general framework of "Specification Structures" is presented for combining different notions and methods in a coherent fashion. This is then applied to concurrency in the se ..."
Abstract

Cited by 21 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Many different notions of "property of interest" and methods of verifying such properties arise naturally in programming. A general framework of "Specification Structures" is presented for combining different notions and methods in a coherent fashion. This is then applied to concurrency in the setting of Interaction Categories.
A specification structure for deadlockfreedom of synchronous processes
 TCS
, 1999
"... Many different notions of "program property", and many different methods of verifying such properties, arise naturally in programming. We present a general framework of Specification Structures for combining different notions and methods in a coherent fashion. We then apply the idea of spe ..."
Abstract

Cited by 3 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Many different notions of "program property", and many different methods of verifying such properties, arise naturally in programming. We present a general framework of Specification Structures for combining different notions and methods in a coherent fashion. We then apply the idea of specification structures to concurrency in the setting of Interaction Categories. As a specific example, a certain specification
Proving FirstOrder Equality Theorems with HyperLinking
, 1995
"... Lee and Plaisted recently developed a new automated theorem proving strategy called hyperlinking. As part of his dissertation, Lee developed a roundbyround implementation of the hyperlinking strategy, which competes well with other automated theorem provers on a wide range of theorem proving p ..."
Abstract

Cited by 2 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Lee and Plaisted recently developed a new automated theorem proving strategy called hyperlinking. As part of his dissertation, Lee developed a roundbyround implementation of the hyperlinking strategy, which competes well with other automated theorem provers on a wide range of theorem proving problems. However, Lee's roundbyround implementation of hyperlinking is not particularly well suited for the addition of special methods in support of equality. In this dissertation, we describe, as alternative to the roundbyround hyperlinking implementation of Lee, a smallest instance first implementation of hyperlinking which addresses many of the inefficiencies of roundbyround hyperlinking encountered when adding special methods in support of equality. Smallest instance first hyperlinking is based on the formalization of generating smallest clauses first, a heuristic widely used in other automated theorem provers. We prove both the soundness and logical completeness of smallest instance first hyperlinking and show that it always generates smallest clauses first under