Results 1  10
of
31
1921]), A Treatise on Probability
, 2004
"... Los paradigmas económicos de Ludwig von Mises por una parte, y de John Maynard Keynes por otra, han sido correctamente reconocidos como contradictorias a nivel teórico, y como antagonistas, con respecto a sus implicancias políticas prácticas y públicas. Desde el punto de vista característico también ..."
Abstract

Cited by 358 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Los paradigmas económicos de Ludwig von Mises por una parte, y de John Maynard Keynes por otra, han sido correctamente reconocidos como contradictorias a nivel teórico, y como antagonistas, con respecto a sus implicancias políticas prácticas y públicas. Desde el punto de vista característico también han sido reivindicadas por sectores de oposición del espectro político. Aún así, las respectivas visiones de estos autores con respecto al significado e interpretación de la probabilidad, muestra una afinidad conceptual más estrecha que los que se ha reconocido en la literatura. Se ha argumentado especialmente que en algunos aspectos importantes, la interpretación de Ludwig von Mises del concepto de probabilidad, muestra una estrecha afinidad con la interpretación de probabilidad desarrollada por su oponente John Maynard Keynes, que con las maneras de ver la probabilidad respaldadas por su hermano Richard von Mises. Sin embargo, también existen grandes diferencias entre los puntos de vista de Ludwig von Mises y aquellos de John Maynard Keynes con respecto a la probabilidad. Uno de ellos se destaca principalmente: cuando John Maynard Keynes aboga por un punto de vista monista de la probabilidad, Ludwig von Mises defiende un punto de vista dualista de la probabilidad, de acuerdo con lo cual, el concepto de probabilidad recibe dos significados diferentes, y en donde cada uno de ellos es válido en un área o contexto en particular. Se concluye que tanto John Maynard Keynes como Ludwig von Mises presentan puntos de vista claramente diferenciados con respecto al significado e interpretación de la probabilidad.
Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics
, 2003
"... Environmentinduced decoherence and superselection have been a subject of intensive research over the past two decades. Yet, their implications for the foundational problems of quantum mechanics, most notably the quantum measurement problem, have remained a matter of great controversy. This paper is ..."
Abstract

Cited by 37 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Environmentinduced decoherence and superselection have been a subject of intensive research over the past two decades. Yet, their implications for the foundational problems of quantum mechanics, most notably the quantum measurement problem, have remained a matter of great controversy. This paper is intended to clarify key features of the decoherence program, including its more recent results, and to investigate their implications for foundational issues, not only concerning the measurement problem but also with respect to the main interpretive approaches of
Entanglement and open systems in algebraic quantum field theory
 Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 32: 1–31
, 2001
"... Entanglement has long been the subject of discussion by philosophers of quantum theory, and has recently come to play an essential role for physicists in their development of quantum information theory. In this paper we show how the formalism of algebraic quantum "eld theory (AQFT) provides a rigoro ..."
Abstract

Cited by 21 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Entanglement has long been the subject of discussion by philosophers of quantum theory, and has recently come to play an essential role for physicists in their development of quantum information theory. In this paper we show how the formalism of algebraic quantum "eld theory (AQFT) provides a rigorous framework within which to analyse entanglement in the context of a fully relativistic formulation of quantum theory. What emerges from the analysis are new practical and theoretical limitations on an experimenter's ability to perform operations on a "eld in one spacetime region that can disentangle its state from the state of the "eld in other spacelikeseparated regions. These limitations show just how deeply entrenched entanglement is in relativistic quantum "eld theory, and yield a fresh perspective on the ways in which the theory di!ers conceptually from both standard nonrelativistic quantum theory and classical relativistic "eld theory. � 2001 Elsevier
Interpreting the Quantum
, 1997
"... This paper is a commentary on the foundational significance of the CliftonBubHalvorson theorem characterizing quantum theory in terms of three informationtheoretic constraints. I argue that: (1) a quantum theory is best understood as a theory about the possibilities and impossibilities of informa ..."
Abstract

Cited by 16 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This paper is a commentary on the foundational significance of the CliftonBubHalvorson theorem characterizing quantum theory in terms of three informationtheoretic constraints. I argue that: (1) a quantum theory is best understood as a theory about the possibilities and impossibilities of information transfer, as opposed to a theory about the mechanics of nonclassical waves or particles, (2) given the informationtheoretic constraints, any mechanical theory of quantum phenomena that includes an account of the measuring instruments that reveal these phenomena must be empirically equivalent to a quantum theory, and (3) assuming the informationtheoretic constraints are in fact satisfied in our world, no mechanical theory of quantum phenomena that includes an account of measurement interactions can be acceptable, and the appropriate aim of physics at the fundamental level then becomes the representation and manipulation of information.
On the explanation for quantum statistics
"... Abstract The concept of classical indistinguishability is analyzed and defended against a number of wellknown criticisms, with particular attention to the Gibbs ’ paradox. Granted that it is as much at home in classical as in quantum statistical mechanics, the question arises as to why indistinguis ..."
Abstract

Cited by 8 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract The concept of classical indistinguishability is analyzed and defended against a number of wellknown criticisms, with particular attention to the Gibbs ’ paradox. Granted that it is as much at home in classical as in quantum statistical mechanics, the question arises as to why indistinguishability, in quantum mechanics but not in classical mechanics, forces a change in statistics. The answer, illustrated with simple examples, is that the equilibrium measure on classical phase space is continuous, whilst on Hilbert space it is discrete. The relevance of names, or equivalently, properties stable in time that can be used as names, is also discussed.
A Classification of HiddenVariable Properties
, 2008
"... Hiddenvariable models of quantum mechanics (QM) are complete descriptions of quantum phenomena. These models have been analyzed under conditions such as locality (Bell [1, 1964]) and noncontextuality (KochenSpecker [20, 1967]). We give a uniform presentation of six underlying properties that can ..."
Abstract

Cited by 7 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Hiddenvariable models of quantum mechanics (QM) are complete descriptions of quantum phenomena. These models have been analyzed under conditions such as locality (Bell [1, 1964]) and noncontextuality (KochenSpecker [20, 1967]). We give a uniform presentation of six underlying properties that can be asked of hiddenvariable models and show all the relationships among them (as depicted in Figure 1.1). Two positive existence theorems are given which show that hiddenvariable models of certain types always exist. We follow this with a unified treatment of the “nogo ” theorems of EinsteinPodolskyRosen [15, 1935], Bell [1, 1964], and KochenSpecker [20, 1967]. Within our sixproperty classification scheme, we are able to give a complete picture of hiddenvariable models.
Dynamics for Density Operator Interpretations of Quantum Theory
, 1997
"... We first introduce and discuss density operator interpretations of quantum theory as a special case of a more general class of interpretations, giving special attention to a version that we call the ‘atomic version’. We then review some crucial parts of the theory of stochastic processes (the proper ..."
Abstract

Cited by 5 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We first introduce and discuss density operator interpretations of quantum theory as a special case of a more general class of interpretations, giving special attention to a version that we call the ‘atomic version’. We then review some crucial parts of the theory of stochastic processes (the proper context in which to discuss dynamics), and develop a general framework for specifying a dynamics for density operator interpretations. This framework admits infinitely many empirically equivalent dynamics. We give some examples, and discuss some of the properties of one of them. Dynamics for Density Operator Interpretations of Quantum Theory We first introduce and discuss density operator interpretations of quantum theory as a special case of a more general class of interpretations, giving special attention to a version that we call the ‘atomic version’. We then review some crucial parts of the theory of stochastic processes (the proper context in which to discuss dynamics), and develop a general framework for specifying a dynamics for density operator interpretations. This framework admits infinitely many empirically equivalent dynamics. We give some examples, and discuss some of the properties of one of them.
Quantum information and computation
 arXiv:quantph/0512125. Forthcoming in Butterfield and Earman (eds.) Handbook of Philosophy of Physics
, 2005
"... This Chapter deals with theoretical developments in the subject of quantum information and quantum computation, and includes an overview of classical information and some relevant quantum mechanics. The discussion covers topics in quantum communication, quantum cryptography, and quantum computation, ..."
Abstract

Cited by 4 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This Chapter deals with theoretical developments in the subject of quantum information and quantum computation, and includes an overview of classical information and some relevant quantum mechanics. The discussion covers topics in quantum communication, quantum cryptography, and quantum computation, and concludes by considering whether a perspective in terms of quantum information
The Description of Joint Quantum Entities and the Formulation of a Paradox
 Int. J. Theor. Phys
, 2000
"... We formulate a paradox in relation to the description of a joint entity consisting of two subentities by standard quantum mechanics. We put forward a proposal for a possible solution, entailing the interpretation of `density states' as `pure states'. We explain where the inspiration for this pro ..."
Abstract

Cited by 3 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We formulate a paradox in relation to the description of a joint entity consisting of two subentities by standard quantum mechanics. We put forward a proposal for a possible solution, entailing the interpretation of `density states' as `pure states'. We explain where the inspiration for this proposal comes from and how its validity can be tested experimentally.
S.: 2001, ’A critical study on the concept of identity in ZermeloFraenkellike axioms
, 2001
"... According to Cantor, a set is a collection into a whole of defined and separate (we shall say distinct) objects. So, a natural question is “How to treat as ‘sets ’ collections of indistinguishable objects?”. This is the aim of quasiset theory, and this problem was posed as the first of present day ..."
Abstract

Cited by 3 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
According to Cantor, a set is a collection into a whole of defined and separate (we shall say distinct) objects. So, a natural question is “How to treat as ‘sets ’ collections of indistinguishable objects?”. This is the aim of quasiset theory, and this problem was posed as the first of present day mathematics, in the list resulting from the Congress on the Hilbert Problems in 1974. Despite this pure mathematical motivation, quasisets have also a strong commitment to the way quantum physics copes with elementary particles. In this paper, we discuss the axiomatics of quasiset theory and sketch some of its applications in physics. We also show that quasiset theory allows us a better and deeper understanding of the role of the concept of equality in mathematics. 1