Results 1  10
of
138
Constraint Logic Programming: A Survey
"... Constraint Logic Programming (CLP) is a merger of two declarative paradigms: constraint solving and logic programming. Although a relatively new field, CLP has progressed in several quite different directions. In particular, the early fundamental concepts have been adapted to better serve in differe ..."
Abstract

Cited by 771 (23 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Constraint Logic Programming (CLP) is a merger of two declarative paradigms: constraint solving and logic programming. Although a relatively new field, CLP has progressed in several quite different directions. In particular, the early fundamental concepts have been adapted to better serve in different areas of applications. In this survey of CLP, a primary goal is to give a systematic description of the major trends in terms of common fundamental concepts. The three main parts cover the theory, implementation issues, and programming for applications.
A NEW POLYNOMIALTIME ALGORITHM FOR LINEAR PROGRAMMING
 COMBINATORICA
, 1984
"... We present a new polynomialtime algorithm for linear programming. In the worst case, the algorithm requires O(tf'SL) arithmetic operations on O(L) bit numbers, where n is the number of variables and L is the number of bits in the input. The running,time of this algorithm is better than the ellipsoi ..."
Abstract

Cited by 652 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We present a new polynomialtime algorithm for linear programming. In the worst case, the algorithm requires O(tf'SL) arithmetic operations on O(L) bit numbers, where n is the number of variables and L is the number of bits in the input. The running,time of this algorithm is better than the ellipsoid algorithm by a factor of O(n~'~). We prove that given a polytope P and a strictly interior point a E P, there is a projective transformation of the space that maps P, a to P', a ' having the following property. The ratio of the radius of the smallest sphere with center a', containing P ' to the radius of the largest sphere with center a ' contained in P ' is O(n). The algorithm consists of repeated application of such projective transformations each followed by optimization over an inscribed sphere to create a sequence of points which converges to the optimal solution in polynomial time.
Linear programming in linear time when the dimension is fixed
 J. ACM
, 1984
"... Abstract. It is demonstrated that the linear programming problem in d variables and n constraints can be solved in O(n) time when d is fixed. This bound follows from a multidimensional search technique which is applicable for quadratic programming as well. There is also developed an algorithm that i ..."
Abstract

Cited by 194 (13 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. It is demonstrated that the linear programming problem in d variables and n constraints can be solved in O(n) time when d is fixed. This bound follows from a multidimensional search technique which is applicable for quadratic programming as well. There is also developed an algorithm that is polynomial in both n and d provided d is bounded by a certain slowly growing function of n. Categories and Subject Descriptors: F.2.1 [Analysis of Algorithms and Problem Complexity]: Numerical Algorithms and Problemscomputations on matrices; F.2.2 [Analysis of Algorithms and Problem Complexity]: Nonnumerical Algorithms and Problemsgeometrical problems and computations; sorting and searching; G. 1.6 [Mathematics of Computing]: Optimizationlinear programming
The NPcompleteness column: an ongoing guide
 Journal of Algorithms
, 1985
"... This is the nineteenth edition of a (usually) quarterly column that covers new developments in the theory of NPcompleteness. The presentation is modeled on that used by M. R. Garey and myself in our book ‘‘Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NPCompleteness,’ ’ W. H. Freeman & Co ..."
Abstract

Cited by 188 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This is the nineteenth edition of a (usually) quarterly column that covers new developments in the theory of NPcompleteness. The presentation is modeled on that used by M. R. Garey and myself in our book ‘‘Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NPCompleteness,’ ’ W. H. Freeman & Co., New York, 1979 (hereinafter referred to as ‘‘[G&J]’’; previous columns will be referred to by their dates). A background equivalent to that provided by [G&J] is assumed, and, when appropriate, crossreferences will be given to that book and the list of problems (NPcomplete and harder) presented there. Readers who have results they would like mentioned (NPhardness, PSPACEhardness, polynomialtimesolvability, etc.) or open problems they would like publicized, should
Algorithms for Sequential Decision Making
, 1996
"... Sequential decision making is a fundamental task faced by any intelligent agent in an extended interaction with its environment; it is the act of answering the question "What should I do now?" In this thesis, I show how to answer this question when "now" is one of a finite set of states, "do" is one ..."
Abstract

Cited by 175 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Sequential decision making is a fundamental task faced by any intelligent agent in an extended interaction with its environment; it is the act of answering the question "What should I do now?" In this thesis, I show how to answer this question when "now" is one of a finite set of states, "do" is one of a finite set of actions, "should" is maximize a longrun measure of reward, and "I" is an automated planning or learning system (agent). In particular,
A Subexponential Bound for Linear Programming
 ALGORITHMICA
, 1996
"... We present a simple randomized algorithm which solves linear programs with n constraints and d variables in expected min{O(d 2 2 d n),e 2 d ln(n / d)+O ( d+ln n)} time in the unit cost model (where we count the number of arithmetic operations on the numbers in the input); to be precise, the algorith ..."
Abstract

Cited by 167 (16 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We present a simple randomized algorithm which solves linear programs with n constraints and d variables in expected min{O(d 2 2 d n),e 2 d ln(n / d)+O ( d+ln n)} time in the unit cost model (where we count the number of arithmetic operations on the numbers in the input); to be precise, the algorithm computes the lexicographically smallest nonnegative point satisfying n given linear inequalities in d variables. The expectation is over the internal randomizations performed by the algorithm, and holds for any input. In conjunction with Clarkson’s linear programming algorithm, this gives an expected bound of O(d 2 n + e O( √ d ln d) The algorithm is presented in an abstract framework, which facilitates its application to several other related problems like computing the smallest enclosing ball (smallest volume enclosing ellipsoid) of n points in dspace, computing the distance of two nvertex (or nfacet) polytopes in dspace, and others. The subexponential running time can also be established for some of these problems (this relies on some recent results due to Gärtner).
Smoothed analysis of algorithms: why the simplex algorithm usually takes polynomial time
, 2003
"... We introduce the smoothed analysis of algorithms, which continuously interpolates between the worstcase and averagecase analyses of algorithms. In smoothed analysis, we measure the maximum over inputs of the expected performance of an algorithm under small random perturbations of that input. We me ..."
Abstract

Cited by 146 (14 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We introduce the smoothed analysis of algorithms, which continuously interpolates between the worstcase and averagecase analyses of algorithms. In smoothed analysis, we measure the maximum over inputs of the expected performance of an algorithm under small random perturbations of that input. We measure this performance in terms of both the input size and the magnitude of the perturbations. We show that the simplex algorithm has smoothed complexity polynomial in the input size and the standard deviation of
On the complexity of solving Markov decision problems
 IN PROC. OF THE ELEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UNCERTAINTY IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
, 1995
"... Markov decision problems (MDPs) provide the foundations for a number of problems of interest to AI researchers studying automated planning and reinforcement learning. In this paper, we summarize results regarding the complexity of solving MDPs and the running time of MDP solution algorithms. We argu ..."
Abstract

Cited by 131 (10 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Markov decision problems (MDPs) provide the foundations for a number of problems of interest to AI researchers studying automated planning and reinforcement learning. In this paper, we summarize results regarding the complexity of solving MDPs and the running time of MDP solution algorithms. We argue that, although MDPs can be solved efficiently in theory, more study is needed to reveal practical algorithms for solving large problems quickly. To encourage future research, we sketch some alternative methods of analysis that rely on the structure of MDPs.
Las Vegas algorithms for linear and integer programming when the dimension is small
 J. ACM
, 1995
"... Abstract. This paper gives an algcmthm for solving linear programming problems. For a problem with tz constraints and d variables, the algorithm requires an expected O(d’n) + (log n)o(d)d’’+(’(’) + o(dJA log n) arithmetic operations, as rz ~ ~. The constant factors do not depend on d. Also, an algor ..."
Abstract

Cited by 103 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. This paper gives an algcmthm for solving linear programming problems. For a problem with tz constraints and d variables, the algorithm requires an expected O(d’n) + (log n)o(d)d’’+(’(’) + o(dJA log n) arithmetic operations, as rz ~ ~. The constant factors do not depend on d. Also, an algorlthm N gwen for integer hnear programmmg. Let p bound the number of bits required to specify the ratmnal numbers defmmg an input constraint or the ob~ective function vector. Let n and d be as before. Then, the algorithm requires expected 0(2d dn + S~dm In n) + dc)’d) ~ in H operations on numbers with O(1~p bits d ~ ~ ~z + ~, where the constant factors do not depend on d or p. The expectations are with respect to the random choices made by the algorithms, and the bounds hold for any gwen input. The techmque can be extended to other convex programming problems. For example, m algorlthm for finding the smallest sphere enclosing a set of /z points m Ed has the same t]me bound
Interior Methods for Constrained Optimization
 Acta Numerica
, 1992
"... Interior methods for optimization were widely used in the 1960s, primarily in the form of barrier methods. However, they were not seriously applied to linear programming because of the dominance of the simplex method. Barrier methods fell from favour during the 1970s for a variety of reasons, includ ..."
Abstract

Cited by 83 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Interior methods for optimization were widely used in the 1960s, primarily in the form of barrier methods. However, they were not seriously applied to linear programming because of the dominance of the simplex method. Barrier methods fell from favour during the 1970s for a variety of reasons, including their apparent inefficiency compared with the best available alternatives. In 1984, Karmarkar's announcement of a fast polynomialtime interior method for linear programming caused tremendous excitement in the field of optimization. A formal connection can be shown between his method and classical barrier methods, which have consequently undergone a renaissance in interest and popularity. Most papers published since 1984 have concentrated on issues of computational complexity in interior methods for linear programming. During the same period, implementations of interior methods have displayed great efficiency in solving many large linear programs of everincreasing size. Interior methods...