• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Other Seers ▼
    RefSeer AckSeer CollabSeer SeerSeer
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations | Disambiguate

Application of minimal perfect hashing in main memory indexing (1994)

by Y Ho
Add To MetaCart

Tools

Sorted by:
Results 1 - 2 of 2

Perfect Spatial Hashing

by Sylvain Lefebvre, Hugues Hoppe
"... ..."
Abstract - Cited by 25 (4 self) - Add to MetaCart
Abstract not found

Indexing Internal Memory with Minimal Perfect Hash Functions

by Fabiano C. Botelho, Hendrickson R. Langbehn, Guilherme Vale Menezes, Nivio Ziviani
"... Abstract. A perfect hash function (PHF) is an injective function that maps keys from a set S to unique values, which are in turn used to index a hash table. Since no collisions occur, each key can be retrieved from the table with a single probe. A minimal perfect hash function (MPHF) is a PHF with t ..."
Abstract - Cited by 1 (1 self) - Add to MetaCart
Abstract. A perfect hash function (PHF) is an injective function that maps keys from a set S to unique values, which are in turn used to index a hash table. Since no collisions occur, each key can be retrieved from the table with a single probe. A minimal perfect hash function (MPHF) is a PHF with the smallest possible range, that is, the hash table size is exactly the number of keys in S. MPHFs are widely used for memory efficient storage and fast retrieval of items from static sets. Differently from other hashing schemes, MPHFs completely avoid the problem of wasted space and wasted time to deal with collisions. In the past, the amount of space to store an MPHF description was O(log n) bits per key and therefore similar to the overhead of space of other hashing schemes. Recent results on MPHFs by [Botelho et al. 2007] changed this scenario: in their work the space overhead of an MPHF is approximately 2.6 bits per key. The objective of this paper is to show that MPHFs are a good option to index internal memory when static key sets are involved and both successful and unsuccessful searches are allowed. We have shown that MPHFs provide the best tradeoff between space usage and lookup time when compared with linear hashing, quadratic hashing, double hashing, dense hashing, cuckoo hashing and sparse hashing. For example, MPHFs outperforms linear hashing, quadratic hashing and double hashing when these methods have a hash table occupancy of 75 % or higher (if the MPHF fits in the CPU cache the same happens for hash table occupancies greater than or equal to 55%). Furthermore, MPHFs also have a better performance in all measured aspects when compared to sparse hashing, which has been designed specifically for efficient memory usage. 1.
The National Science Foundation
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2010 The Pennsylvania State University