Results 1  10
of
130
Random Oracles are Practical: A Paradigm for Designing Efficient Protocols
, 1995
"... We argue that the random oracle model  where all parties have access to a public random oracle  provides a bridge between cryptographic theory and cryptographic practice. In the paradigm we suggest, a practical protocol P is produced by first devising and proving correct a protocol P R for the ..."
Abstract

Cited by 1643 (75 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
We argue that the random oracle model  where all parties have access to a public random oracle  provides a bridge between cryptographic theory and cryptographic practice. In the paradigm we suggest, a practical protocol P is produced by first devising and proving correct a protocol P R for the random oracle model, and then replacing oracle accesses by the computation of an "appropriately chosen" function h. This paradigm yields protocols much more efficient than standard ones while retaining many of the advantages of provable security. We illustrate these gains for problems including encryption, signatures, and zeroknowledge proofs.
NonMalleable Cryptography
 SIAM Journal on Computing
, 2000
"... The notion of nonmalleable cryptography, an extension of semantically secure cryptography, is defined. Informally, in the context of encryption the additional requirement is that given the ciphertext it is impossible to generate a different ciphertext so that the respective plaintexts are related. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 490 (21 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
The notion of nonmalleable cryptography, an extension of semantically secure cryptography, is defined. Informally, in the context of encryption the additional requirement is that given the ciphertext it is impossible to generate a different ciphertext so that the respective plaintexts are related. The same concept makes sense in the contexts of string commitment and zeroknowledge proofs of possession of knowledge. Nonmalleable schemes for each of these three problems are presented. The schemes do not assume a trusted center; a user need not know anything about the number or identity of other system users. Our cryptosystem is the first proven to be secure against a strong type of chosen ciphertext attack proposed by Rackoff and Simon, in which the attacker knows the ciphertext she wishes to break and can query the decryption oracle on any ciphertext other than the target.
Publickey Cryptosystems Provably Secure against Chosen Ciphertext Attacks
 In Proc. of the 22nd STOC
, 1995
"... We show how to construct a publickey cryptosystem (as originally defined by Diffie and Hellman) secure against chosen ciphertext attacks, given a publickey cryptosystem secure against passive eavesdropping and a noninteractive zeroknowledge proof system in the shared string model. No such secure ..."
Abstract

Cited by 284 (20 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
We show how to construct a publickey cryptosystem (as originally defined by Diffie and Hellman) secure against chosen ciphertext attacks, given a publickey cryptosystem secure against passive eavesdropping and a noninteractive zeroknowledge proof system in the shared string model. No such secure cryptosystems were known before. Key words. cryptography, randomized algorithms AMS subject classifications. 68M10, 68Q20, 68Q22, 68R05, 68R10 A preliminary version of this paper appeared in the Proc. of the Twenty Second ACM Symposium of Theory of Computing. y Incumbent of the Morris and Rose Goldman Career Development Chair, Dept. of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel. Work performed while at the IBM Almaden Research Center. Research supported by an Alon Fellowship and a grant from the Israel Science Foundation administered by the Israeli Academy of Sciences. Email: naor@wisdom.weizmann.ac.il. z IBM Research Division, T.J ...
Optimal Asymmetric Encryption
, 1994
"... Given an arbitrary kbit to kbit trapdoor permutation f and a hash function, we exhibit an encryption scheme for which (i) any string z of length slightly less than k bits can be encrypted as where r= is a simple probabilistic encoding of z depending on the hash function; and (ii) the scheme ca ..."
Abstract

Cited by 277 (18 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Given an arbitrary kbit to kbit trapdoor permutation f and a hash function, we exhibit an encryption scheme for which (i) any string z of length slightly less than k bits can be encrypted as where r= is a simple probabilistic encoding of z depending on the hash function; and (ii) the scheme can be proven semantically secure assuming the hash function is "ideal." Moreover, a slightly enhanced scheme is shown to have the property that the adversary can create ciphertexts only of strings for which she "knows" the corresponding plaintexts such a scheme is not only semantically secure but also nonmalleable and secure against chosenciphertext attack.
NTRU: A RingBased Public Key Cryptosystem
 Lecture Notes in Computer Science
, 1998
"... . We describe NTRU, a new public key cryptosystem. NTRU features reasonably short, easily created keys, high speed, and low memory requirements. NTRU encryption and decryption use a mixing system suggested by polynomial algebra combined with a clustering principle based on elementary probability the ..."
Abstract

Cited by 203 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
. We describe NTRU, a new public key cryptosystem. NTRU features reasonably short, easily created keys, high speed, and low memory requirements. NTRU encryption and decryption use a mixing system suggested by polynomial algebra combined with a clustering principle based on elementary probability theory. The security of the NTRU cryptosystem comes from the interaction of the polynomial mixing system with the independence of reduction modulo two relatively prime integers p and q. Contents 0. Introduction 1. Description of the NTRU algorithm 1.1. Notation 1.2. Key Creation 1.3. Encryption 1.4. Decryption 1.5. Why Decryption Works 2. Parameter Selection 2.1. Notation and a norm estimate 2.2. Sample spaces 2.3. A Decryption Criterion 3. Security Analysis 3.1. Brute force attacks 3.2. Meetinthemiddle attacks 3.3. Multiple transmission attacks 3.4. Lattice based attacks 4. Practical Implementations of NTRU 4.1. Specific Parameter Choices 4.2. Lattice Attacks  Experimental Evidence 5. A...
Numbertheoretic constructions of efficient pseudorandom functions
 In 38th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
, 1997
"... ..."
PublicKey Cryptosystems from Lattice Reduction Problems
, 1996
"... We present a new proposal for a trapdoor oneway function, from whichwe derive publickey encryption and digital signatures. The security of the new construction is based on the conjectured computational difficulty of latticereduction problems, providing a possible alternative to existing publicke ..."
Abstract

Cited by 148 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We present a new proposal for a trapdoor oneway function, from whichwe derive publickey encryption and digital signatures. The security of the new construction is based on the conjectured computational difficulty of latticereduction problems, providing a possible alternative to existing publickey encryption algorithms and digital signatures such as RSA and DSS.
On the Limits of NonApproximability of Lattice Problems
, 1998
"... We show simple constantround interactive proof systems for problems capturing the approximability, to within a factor of p n, of optimization problems in integer lattices; specifically, the closest vector problem (CVP), and the shortest vector problem (SVP). These interactive proofs are for th ..."
Abstract

Cited by 102 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We show simple constantround interactive proof systems for problems capturing the approximability, to within a factor of p n, of optimization problems in integer lattices; specifically, the closest vector problem (CVP), and the shortest vector problem (SVP). These interactive proofs are for the "coNP direction"; that is, we give an interactive protocol showing that a vector is "far" from the lattice (for CVP), and an interactive protocol showing that the shortestlatticevector is "long" (for SVP). Furthermore, these interactive proof systems are HonestVerifier Perfect ZeroKnowledge. We conclude that approximating CVP (resp., SVP) within a factor of p n is in NP " coAM. Thus, it seems unlikely that approximating these problems to within a p n factor is NPhard. Previously, for the CVP (resp., SVP) problem, Lagarias et. al., Hastad and Banaszczyk showed that the gap problem corresponding to approximating CVP (resp., SVP) within n is in NP " coNP . On the other hand, Ar...