The inherently multivariate nature of functional brain imaging data affords the unique opportunity to explore how anatomically disparate brain areas interact during cognitive tasks. We introduce a new method for characterizing inter-regional interactions using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. This method's principle advantage over existing analytical techniques is its ability to model the functional connectivity between brain regions during distinct stages of a cognitive task. The method is implemented by using separate covariates to model the activity evoked during each stage of each individual trial in the context of the general linear model (GLM). The resulting parameter estimates (beta values) are sorted according to the stage from which they were derived to form a set of stage-specific beta series. Regions whose beta series are correlated during a given stage are inferred to be functionally interacting during that stage. To validate the assumption that correlated fluctuations in trial-to-trial beta values imply functional connectivity, we applied the method to an event-related fMRI data set in which subjects performed two sequencetapping tasks. In concordance with previous electrophysiological and fMRI coherence studies, we found that the task requiring greater bimanual coordination induced stronger correlations between motor regions of the two hemispheres. The method was then applied to an event-related fMRI data set in which subjects performed a delayed recognition task. Distinct functional connectivity maps were generated during the component stages of this task, illustrating how important and novel observations of neural networks within the isolated stages of a cognitive task can be obtained.

& The mapping of cognitive functions to neural systems is a central goal of cognitive neuroscience. On the basis of homology with lesion and physiological studies in nonhuman primates, Brodmann’s area (BA) 46/9 in the middle frontal gyrus (MFG) has been proposed as the cortical focus for both the storage as well as processing components of working memory in the human brain, but the evidence on the segregation of these components and their exact areal localization has been inconsistent. In order to study this issue and increase the temporal resolution of functional mapping, we disambiguated the storage component of working memory from sensory and motor responses by employing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in spatial delayed-response (DR) tasks with long delay intervals and different conditions of demand. We here show that BA 46 can support a sustained mnemonic response for as long as 24 sec in a high-demand task and the signal change in this area exceeded that in the other prefrontal areas examined. Our findings support a conservation of functional architecture between human and nonhuman primate in showing that the MFG is prominently engaged in the storage of spatial information. &

Abstract—Functional neuroimaging studies consistently implicate a widespread network of human cortical brain areas that together support spatial working memory. This review summarizes our recent functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of humans performing delayed-saccades. These studies have isolated persistent activity in dorsal prefrontal regions, like the frontal eye fields, and the posterior parietal cortex during the maintenance of positional information. We aim to gain insight into the type of information coded by this activity. By manipulating the sensory and motor demands of the working memory task, we have been able to modulate the frontal eye fields and posterior parietal cortex delay-period activity. These findings are discussed in the context of other neurophysiological and lesion-based data and some hypotheses regarding the differential contributions of frontal and parietal areas to spatial working memory are offered. Namely, retrospective sensory coding of space may be more prominent in the posterior parietal cortex, while prospective motor coding of space may be more prominent in the frontal eye fields. © 2005 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IBRO.

Neuroimaging evidence is conflicting regarding whether human prefrontal cortex (PFC) shows functional organization by type of processes engaged or type of information processed. Most studies use complex working or long-term memory tasks requiring multiple processes and the combinations of processes recruited for different materials may vary. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and simple tasks suggested by a component process approach, we found activity in left PFC when participants thought about (refreshed) a just-seen item and in right PFC when participants noted whether an item had been presented previously. Furthermore, the distribution of activation in left or right PFC varied with type of information. Thus, at the component process level, PFC shows functional organization by both process and type of information.

& Neurovascular correlates of response preparation have been investigated in human neuroimaging studies. However, conventional neuroimaging cannot distinguish, within the same trial, between areas involved in response selection and/ or response execution and areas specifically involved in response preparation. The specific contribution of parietal and frontal areas to motor preparation has been explored in electrophysiological studies in monkey. However, the asso-ciative nature of sensorimotor tasks calls for the additional contributions of other cortical regions. In this article, we have investigated the functional anatomy of movement represen-tations in the context of an associative visuomotor task with instructed delays. Neural correlates of movement representa-tions have been assessed by isolating preparatory activity that

Abstract not found

This is a good and helpful book, but with some overstatements and ingratitude to past paradigm shifters! Brendan Wallace writes the Introduction and, with Alastair Ross, the final ‘Conclusion: The Future of an Illusion’. In between, they step aside and let 15 other people communicate. (In what follows, chapter authors are given in bold type.) Their ‘illusion’is ‘cognitivism’which (blending several definitions in the book) is the computer inspired view that humans ‘map ’ external

■ Previous functional imaging research has consistently indi-cated involvement of bilateral fronto-parietal networks during the execution of visuospatial tasks. Studies with TMS have sug-gested that the right hemispheric network, but not the left, is func-tionally relevant for visuospatial judgments. However, very little is still known about the interactions within these fronto-parietal networks underlying visuospatial processing. In the current study, we investigated taskmodulation of functional connectivity (instan-taneous correlations of regional time courses), and task-specific effective connectivity (direction of influences), within the right fronto-parietal network activated during visuospatial judgments. Ten healthy volunteers performed a behaviorally controlled visuo-spatial judgment task (ANGLE) or a control task (COLOR) in an fMRI experiment. Visuospatial task-specific activations were found

Abstract We used Positron Emission Tomography to map the neural substrate of human short-term memory for orientation, de®ned as retaining a single orientation in memory over a long delay, by comparing a successive discrimination task with a 6-s delay to the same task with a brief 0.3 s delay and to an identi®cation control task. Short-term memory engaged the superior parietal lobe bilaterally, the middle occipital gyrus bilaterally and the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. In addition, we studied the resistance to a distractor item by comparing the successive discrimination task with long delay, with and without an intervening distractor stimulus. This manipulative process engaged left ventral premotor cortex and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The activation of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is interpreted as re¯ecting co-ordination between task components. These results, combined with those of two previous studies using an identical reduction strategy, underscore the functional heterogeneity in the prefrontal cortex during short-term and working memory.

Using magnetoencephalography, we investigated the spatiotempo-ral patterns of brain magnetic activity responsible for maintaining verbal and spatial information in either an integrated or an unin-tegrated fashion. Considering time dimension, we noted a greater activation of a fronto-parietal network in early latencies during the maintenance of integrated information, and a different pattern during the maintenance of unintegrated material, showing a greater activation in a fronto-posterior network in late latencies. The greater activation found in certain areas which are traditionally reported as being engaged in spatial working memory (i.e. superior frontal gyri, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, superior and inferior parietal lobes) when subjects maintained integrated information could be explained by a greater weight of the spatial dimension. It is as if words somehow acquired a spatial attribute, thus exerting a greater load in a neural network specialized in spatial working memory. Alternatively, and not mutually exclusive, we also propose that during the maintenance of integrated information the allocation of cognitive resources is less interfering than during the mainte-nance of unintegrated information, making it easier.