Results 1 
2 of
2
On Plain and Hereditary HistoryPreserving Bisimulation
, 1999
"... We investigate the difference between two wellknown notions of independence bisimilarity, historypreserving bisimulation and hereditary historypreserving bisimulation. We characterise the difference between the two bisimulations in tracetheoretical terms, advocating the view that the first i ..."
Abstract

Cited by 14 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We investigate the difference between two wellknown notions of independence bisimilarity, historypreserving bisimulation and hereditary historypreserving bisimulation. We characterise the difference between the two bisimulations in tracetheoretical terms, advocating the view that the first is (just) a bisimulation for causality, while the second is a bisimulation for concurrency. We explore the frontier zone between the two notions by defining a hierarchy of bounded backtracking bisimulations.
Categorical Models for Concurrency: Independence, Fairness and Dataflow
 BRICS DISSERTATION SERIES DS001
, 2000
"... This thesis is concerned with formal semantics and models for concurrent computational systems, that is, systems consisting of a number of parallel computing sequential systems, interacting with each other and the environment. A formal semantics gives meaning to computational systems by describing t ..."
Abstract

Cited by 6 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This thesis is concerned with formal semantics and models for concurrent computational systems, that is, systems consisting of a number of parallel computing sequential systems, interacting with each other and the environment. A formal semantics gives meaning to computational systems by describing their behaviour in a mathematical model. For concurrent systems the interesting aspect of their computation is often how they interact with the environment during a computation and not in which state they terminate, indeed they may not be intended to terminate at all. For this reason they are often referred to as reactive systems, to distinguish them from traditional calculational systems, as e.g. a program calculating your income tax, for which the interesting behaviour is the answer it gives when (or if) it terminates, in other words the (possibly partial) function it computes between input and output. Church's thesis tells us that regardless of whether we choose the lambda calculus, Turing machines, or almost any modern programming language such as C or Java to describe calculational systems, we are able to describe exactly the same class of functions. However, there is no agreement on observable behaviour for concurrent reactive systems, and consequently there is no correspondent to Church's thesis. A result of this fact is that an overwhelming number of different and often competing notions of observable behaviours, primitive operations, languages and mathematical models for describing their semantics, have been proposed in the litterature on concurrency. The work