Results 1  10
of
39
Regular Types for Active Objects
, 1993
"... Previous work on typetheoretic foundations for objectoriented programming languages has mostly focused on applying or extending functional type theory to functional "objects." This approach, while benefiting from a vast body of existing literature, has the disadvantage of dealing with st ..."
Abstract

Cited by 198 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Previous work on typetheoretic foundations for objectoriented programming languages has mostly focused on applying or extending functional type theory to functional "objects." This approach, while benefiting from a vast body of existing literature, has the disadvantage of dealing with state change either in a roundabout way or not at all, and completely sidestepping issues of concurrency. In particular, dynamic issues of nonuniform service availability and conformance to protocols are not addressed by functional types. We propose a new type framework that characterizes objects as regular (finite state) processes that provide guarantees of service along public channels. We also propose a new notion of subtyping for active objects, based on Brinksma's notion of extension, that extends Wegner and Zdonik's "principle of substitutability" to nonuniform service availability. Finally, we formalize what it means to "satisfy a client's expectations," and we show how regular types canbe used...
TableauBased Model Checking in the Propositional MuCalculus
 Acta Informatica
, 1990
"... This paper describes a procedure, based around the construction of tableau proofs, for determining whether finitestate systems enjoy properties formulated in the propositional mucalculus. It presents a tableaubased proof system for the logic and proves it sound and complete, and it discusses tech ..."
Abstract

Cited by 94 (7 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
This paper describes a procedure, based around the construction of tableau proofs, for determining whether finitestate systems enjoy properties formulated in the propositional mucalculus. It presents a tableaubased proof system for the logic and proves it sound and complete, and it discusses techniques for the efficient construction of proofs that states enjoy properties expressed in the logic. The approach is the basis of an ongoing implementation of a model checker in the Concurrency Workbench, an automated tool for the analysis of concurrent systems. 1 Introduction One area of program verification that has proven amenable to automation involves the analysis of finitestate processes. While computer systems in general are not finitestate, many interesting ones, including a variety of communication protocols and hardware systems, are, and their finitary nature enables the development and implementation of decision procedures that test for various properties. Model checking has p...
Model Checking for ContextFree Processes
, 1992
"... We develop a modelchecking algorithm that decides for a given contextfree process whether it satisfies a property written in the alternationfree modal mucalculus. The central idea behind this algorithm is to raise the standard iterative modelchecking techniques to higher order: in contrast to t ..."
Abstract

Cited by 81 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
We develop a modelchecking algorithm that decides for a given contextfree process whether it satisfies a property written in the alternationfree modal mucalculus. The central idea behind this algorithm is to raise the standard iterative modelchecking techniques to higher order: in contrast to the usual approaches, in which the set of formulas that are satisfied by a certain state are iteratively computed, our algorithm iteratively computes a property transformer for each state class of the finite process representation. These property transformers can then simply be applied to solve the modelchecking problem. The complexity of our algorithm is linear in the size of the system's representation and exponential in the size of the property being investigated.
Efficient OntheFly ModelChecking for Regular AlternationFree MuCalculus
, 2000
"... Modelchecking is a successful technique for automatically verifying concurrent finitestate systems. When building a modelchecker, a good compromise must be made between the expressive power of the property description formalism, the complexity of the modelchecking problem, and the userfriendlin ..."
Abstract

Cited by 69 (15 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Modelchecking is a successful technique for automatically verifying concurrent finitestate systems. When building a modelchecker, a good compromise must be made between the expressive power of the property description formalism, the complexity of the modelchecking problem, and the userfriendliness of the interface. We present a temporal logic and an associated modelchecking method that attempt to fulfill these criteria. The logic is an extension of the alternationfree µcalculus with ACTLlike action formulas and PDLlike regular expressions, allowing a concise and intuitive description of safety, liveness, and fairness properties over labeled transition systems. The modelchecking method is based upon a succinct translation of the verification problem into a boolean equation system, which is solved by means of an efficient local algorithm having a good average complexity. The algorithm also allows to generate full diagnostic information (examples and counterexamples) for temporal for...
Model Checking Mobile Processes
, 1993
"... We introduce a temporal logic for the polyadic ßcalculus based on fixed point extensions of HennessyMilner logic. Features are added to account for parametrisation, generation, and passing of names, including the use, following Milner, of dependent sum and product to account for (unlocalised) inpu ..."
Abstract

Cited by 68 (11 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We introduce a temporal logic for the polyadic ßcalculus based on fixed point extensions of HennessyMilner logic. Features are added to account for parametrisation, generation, and passing of names, including the use, following Milner, of dependent sum and product to account for (unlocalised) input and output, and explicit parametrisation on names using lambdaabstraction and application. The latter provides a single name binding mechanism supporting all parametrisation needed. A proof system and decision procedure is developed based on Stirling and Walker's approach to model checking the modal ¯calculus using constants. One difficulty, for both conceptual and efficiencybased reasons, is to avoid the explicit use of the !rule for parametrised processes. A key idea, following Hennessy and Lin's approach to deciding bisimulation for certain types of valuepassing processes, is the relativisation of correctness assertions to conditions on names. Based on this idea a proof system and ...
Pushdown Processes: Parallel Composition and Model Checking
, 1993
"... In this paper we consider a strict generalization of contextfree processes, the pushdown processes, and show that this class of processes is 1) closed under parallel composition with finite state systems, and can 2) be model checked by means of an elegant adaptation of the higher order model che ..."
Abstract

Cited by 29 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In this paper we consider a strict generalization of contextfree processes, the pushdown processes, and show that this class of processes is 1) closed under parallel composition with finite state systems, and can 2) be model checked by means of an elegant adaptation of the higher order model checker introduced in [BS92]. This shows the advantages of pushdown processes over contextfree processes, which are not sufficiently general in order to support parallel composition.
Computing Behavioural Relations, Logically
 In Proceedings of 18th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming
, 1991
"... This paper develops a modelchecking algorithm for a fragment of the modal mucalculus and shows how it may be applied to the efficient computation of behavioral relations between processes. The algorithm's complexity is proportional to the product of the size of the process and the size of ..."
Abstract

Cited by 28 (7 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
This paper develops a modelchecking algorithm for a fragment of the modal mucalculus and shows how it may be applied to the efficient computation of behavioral relations between processes. The algorithm's complexity is proportional to the product of the size of the process and the size of the formula, and thus improves on the best existing algorithm for such a fixed point logic. The method for computing preorders that the model checker induces is also more efficient than known algorithms.
Generating Data Flow Analysis Algorithms from Modal Specifications
 SCIENCE OF COMPUTER PROGRAMMING
, 1993
"... The paper develops a framework that is based on the idea that modal logic provides an appropriate framework for the specification of data flow analysis (DFA) algorithms as soon as programs are represented as models of the logic. This can be exploited to construct a DFAgenerator that generates effic ..."
Abstract

Cited by 27 (7 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The paper develops a framework that is based on the idea that modal logic provides an appropriate framework for the specification of data flow analysis (DFA) algorithms as soon as programs are represented as models of the logic. This can be exploited to construct a DFAgenerator that generates efficient implementations of DFAalgorithms from modal specifications by partially evaluating a specific model checker with respect to the specifying modal formula. Moreover, the use of a modal logic as specification language for DFAalgorithms supports the compositional development of specifications and structured proofs of properties of DFAalgorithms.  The framework is illustrated by means of a real life example: the problem of determining optimal computation points within flow graphs.
The Use of Static Constructs in A Modal Process Logic
, 1989
"... this paper we want to demonstrate that  from a practical ..."
Abstract

Cited by 25 (13 self)
 Add to MetaCart
this paper we want to demonstrate that  from a practical
A model checking language for concurrent valuepassing systems
 Proc. of FM’2008, LNCS
, 2008
"... Abstract. Modal µcalculus is an expressive specification formalism for temporal properties of concurrent programs represented as Labeled Transition Systems (Ltss). However, its practical use is hampered by the complexity of the formulas, which makes the specification task difficult and errorpron ..."
Abstract

Cited by 20 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract. Modal µcalculus is an expressive specification formalism for temporal properties of concurrent programs represented as Labeled Transition Systems (Ltss). However, its practical use is hampered by the complexity of the formulas, which makes the specification task difficult and errorprone. In this paper, we propose Mcl (Model Checking Language), an enhancement of modal µcalculus with highlevel operators aimed at improving expressiveness and conciseness of formulas. The main Mcl ingredients are parameterized fixed points, action patterns extracting data values from Lts actions, modalities on transition sequences described using extended regular expressions and programming language constructs, and an infinite looping operator specifying fairness. We also present a method for onthefly model checking of Mcl formulas on finite Ltss, based on the local resolution of boolean equation systems, which has a lineartime complexity for alternationfree and fairness formulas. Mcl is supported by the Evaluator 4.0 model checker developed within the Cadp verification toolbox. 1