• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Other Seers ▼
    RefSeer AckSeer CollabSeer SeerSeer
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations | Disambiguate

Graph nonisomorphism has subexponential size proofs unless the polynomial-time hierarchy collapses (0)

by Adam Klivans, Dieter van Melkebeek
Venue:SIAM J. Comput
Add To MetaCart

Tools

Sorted by:
Results 1 - 10 of 58
Next 10 →

Pseudorandom generators without the XOR Lemma

by Madhu Sudan, Luca Trevisan, Salil Vadhan , 1998
"... Madhu Sudan y Luca Trevisan z Salil Vadhan x Abstract Impagliazzo and Wigderson [IW97] have recently shown that if there exists a decision problem solvable in time 2 O(n) and having circuit complexity 2 n) (for all but finitely many n) then P = BPP. This result is a culmination of a serie ..."
Abstract - Cited by 113 (19 self) - Add to MetaCart
Madhu Sudan y Luca Trevisan z Salil Vadhan x Abstract Impagliazzo and Wigderson [IW97] have recently shown that if there exists a decision problem solvable in time 2 O(n) and having circuit complexity 2 n) (for all but finitely many n) then P = BPP. This result is a culmination of a series of works showing connections between the existence of hard predicates and the existence of good pseudorandom generators. The construction of Impagliazzo and Wigderson goes through three phases of "hardness amplification" (a multivariate polynomial encoding, a first derandomized XOR Lemma, and a second derandomized XOR Lemma) that are composed with the Nisan-- Wigderson [NW94] generator. In this paper we present two different approaches to proving the main result of Impagliazzo and Wigderson. In developing each approach, we introduce new techniques and prove new results that could be useful in future improvements and/or applications of hardness-randomness trade-offs. Our first result is that when (a modified version of) the NisanWigderson generator construction is applied with a "mildly" hard predicate, the result is a generator that produces a distribution indistinguishable from having large min-entropy. An extractor can then be used to produce a distribution computationally indistinguishable from uniform. This is the first construction of a pseudorandom generator that works with a mildly hard predicate without doing hardness amplification. We then show that in the Impagliazzo--Wigderson construction only the first hardness-amplification phase (encoding with multivariate polynomial) is necessary, since it already gives the required average-case hardness. We prove this result by (i) establishing a connection between the hardness-amplification problem and a listdecoding...

Simple Extractors for All Min-Entropies and a New Pseudo-Random Generator

by Ronen Shaltiel, Christopher Umans - Journal of the ACM , 2001
"... A “randomness extractor ” is an algorithm that given a sample from a distribution with sufficiently high min-entropy and a short random seed produces an output that is statistically indistinguishable from uniform. (Min-entropy is a measure of the amount of randomness in a distribution). We present a ..."
Abstract - Cited by 93 (26 self) - Add to MetaCart
A “randomness extractor ” is an algorithm that given a sample from a distribution with sufficiently high min-entropy and a short random seed produces an output that is statistically indistinguishable from uniform. (Min-entropy is a measure of the amount of randomness in a distribution). We present a simple, self-contained extractor construction that produces good extractors for all min-entropies. Our construction is algebraic and builds on a new polynomial-based approach introduced by Ta-Shma, Zuckerman, and Safra [TSZS01]. Using our improvements, we obtain, for example, an extractor with output length m = k/(log n) O(1/α) and seed length (1 + α) log n for an arbitrary 0 < α ≤ 1, where n is the input length, and k is the min-entropy of the input distribution. A “pseudorandom generator ” is an algorithm that given a short random seed produces a long output that is computationally indistinguishable from uniform. Our technique also gives a new way to construct pseudorandom generators from functions that require large circuits. Our pseudorandom generator construction is not based on the Nisan-Wigderson generator [NW94], and turns worst-case hardness directly into pseudorandomness. The parameters of our generator match those in [IW97, STV01] and in particular are strong enough to obtain a new proof that P = BP P if E requires exponential size circuits.

Extractors and Pseudorandom Generators

by Luca Trevisan - Journal of the ACM , 1999
"... We introduce a new approach to constructing extractors. Extractors are algorithms that transform a "weakly random" distribution into an almost uniform distribution. Explicit constructions of extractors have a variety of important applications, and tend to be very difficult to obtain. ..."
Abstract - Cited by 66 (5 self) - Add to MetaCart
We introduce a new approach to constructing extractors. Extractors are algorithms that transform a "weakly random" distribution into an almost uniform distribution. Explicit constructions of extractors have a variety of important applications, and tend to be very difficult to obtain.

Extracting randomness from samplable distributions

by Luca Trevisan, Salil Vadhaný - In Proceedings of the 41st Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science , 2000
"... The standard notion of a randomness extractor is a procedure which converts any weak source of randomness into an almost uniform distribution. The conversion necessarily uses a small amount of pure randomness, which can be eliminated by complete enumeration in some, but not all, applications. Here, ..."
Abstract - Cited by 46 (7 self) - Add to MetaCart
The standard notion of a randomness extractor is a procedure which converts any weak source of randomness into an almost uniform distribution. The conversion necessarily uses a small amount of pure randomness, which can be eliminated by complete enumeration in some, but not all, applications. Here, we consider the problem of deterministically converting a weak source of randomness into an almost uniform distribution. Previously, deterministic extraction procedures were known only for sources satisfying strong independence requirements. In this paper, we look at sources which are samplable, i.e. can be generated by an efficient sampling algorithm. We seek an efficient deterministic procedure that, given a sample from any samplable distribution of sufficiently large min-entropy, gives an almost uniformly distributed output. We explore the conditions under which such deterministic extractors exist. We observe that no deterministic extractor exists if the sampler is allowed to use more computational resources than the extractor. On the other hand, if the extractor is allowed (polynomially) more resources than the sampler, we show that deterministic extraction becomes possible. This is true unconditionally in the nonuniform setting (i.e., when the extractor can be computed by a small circuit), and (necessarily) relies on complexity assumptions in the uniform setting. One of our uniform constructions is as follows: assuming that there are problems in���ÌÁÅ�ÇÒthat are not solvable by subexponential-size circuits with¦� gates, there is an efficient extractor that transforms any samplable distribution of lengthÒand min-entropy Ò into an output distribution of length ÇÒ, whereis any sufficiently small constant. The running time of the extractor is polynomial inÒand the circuit complexity of the sampler. These extractors are based on a connection be-

In Search of an Easy Witness: Exponential Time vs. Probabilistic Polynomial Time

by Russell Impagliazzo, Valentine Kabanets, Avi Wigderson
"... Restricting the search space f0; 1g to the set of truth tables of "easy" Boolean functions on log n variables, as well as using some known hardness-randomness tradeoffs, we establish a number of results relating the complexity of exponential-time and probabilistic polynomialtime complexity cla ..."
Abstract - Cited by 44 (3 self) - Add to MetaCart
Restricting the search space f0; 1g to the set of truth tables of "easy" Boolean functions on log n variables, as well as using some known hardness-randomness tradeoffs, we establish a number of results relating the complexity of exponential-time and probabilistic polynomialtime complexity classes. In particular, we show that NEXP ae P=poly , NEXP = MA; this can be interpreted as saying that no derandomization of MA (and, hence, of promise-BPP) is possible unless NEXP contains a hard Boolean function. We also prove several downward closure results for ZPP, RP, BPP, and MA; e.g., we show EXP = BPP , EE = BPE, where EE is the double-exponential time class and BPE is the exponential-time analogue of BPP.

Easiness Assumptions and Hardness Tests: Trading Time for Zero Error

by Valentine Kabanets - Journal of Computer and System Sciences , 2000
"... We propose a new approach towards derandomization in the uniform setting, where it is computationally hard to nd possible mistakes in the simulation of a given probabilistic algorithm. The approach consists in combining both easiness and hardness complexity assumptions: if a derandomization metho ..."
Abstract - Cited by 39 (3 self) - Add to MetaCart
We propose a new approach towards derandomization in the uniform setting, where it is computationally hard to nd possible mistakes in the simulation of a given probabilistic algorithm. The approach consists in combining both easiness and hardness complexity assumptions: if a derandomization method based on an easiness assumption fails, then we obtain a certain hardness test that can be used to remove error in BPP algorithms. As an application, we prove that every RP algorithm can be simulated by a zero-error probabilistic algorithm, running in expected subexponential time, that appears correct innitely often (i.o.) to every ecient adversary. A similar result by Impagliazzo and Wigderson (FOCS'98) states that BPP allows deterministic subexponential-time simulations that appear correct with respect to any eciently sampleable distribution i.o., under the assumption that EXP 6= BPP; in contrast, our result does not rely on any unproven assumptions. As another application of our...

Extractors and Pseudo-Random Generators with Optimal Seed Length

by Russell Impagliazzo, Ronen Shaltiel, Avi Widgerson , 1999
"... We give the rst construction of a pseudo-random generator with optimal seed length that uses (essentially) arbitrary hardness. It builds on the novel recursive use of the NW-generator in [ISW99], which produced many optimal generators one of which was pseudo-random. This is achieved in two stages ..."
Abstract - Cited by 35 (10 self) - Add to MetaCart
We give the rst construction of a pseudo-random generator with optimal seed length that uses (essentially) arbitrary hardness. It builds on the novel recursive use of the NW-generator in [ISW99], which produced many optimal generators one of which was pseudo-random. This is achieved in two stages - rst signicantly reducing the number of candidate generators, and then eciently combining them into one. We also give the rst construction of an extractor with optimal seed length, that can handle sub-polynomial entropy levels. It builds on the fundamental connection between extractors and pseudo-random generators discovered by Trevisan [Tre99], combined with construction above. Moreover, using Kolmogorov Complexity rather than circuit size in the analysis gives superpolynomial savings for our construction, and renders our extractors better than known for all entropy levels. Research Supported by NSF Award CCR-9734911, Sloan Research Fellowship BR-3311, grant #93025 of the j...

Statistical zero-knowledge proofs with efficient provers: Lattice problems and more

by Daniele Micciancio, Salil Vadhan - In CRYPTO , 2003
"... Abstract. We construct several new statistical zero-knowledge proofs with efficient provers, i.e. ones where the prover strategy runs in probabilistic polynomial time given an NP witness for the input string. Our first proof systems are for approximate versions of the Shortest Vector Problem (SVP) a ..."
Abstract - Cited by 33 (8 self) - Add to MetaCart
Abstract. We construct several new statistical zero-knowledge proofs with efficient provers, i.e. ones where the prover strategy runs in probabilistic polynomial time given an NP witness for the input string. Our first proof systems are for approximate versions of the Shortest Vector Problem (SVP) and Closest Vector Problem (CVP), where the witness is simply a short vector in the lattice or a lattice vector close to the target, respectively. Our proof systems are in fact proofs of knowledge, and as a result, we immediately obtain efficient lattice-based identification schemes which can be implemented with arbitrary families of lattices in which the approximate SVP or CVP are hard. We then turn to the general question of whether all problems in SZK ∩ NP admit statistical zero-knowledge proofs with efficient provers. Towards this end, we give a statistical zero-knowledge proof system with an efficient prover for a natural restriction of Statistical Difference, a complete problem for SZK. We also suggest a plausible approach to resolving the general question in the positive. 1

Power from Random Strings

by Eric Allender , Harry Buhrman, Michal Koucky, Dieter van Melkebeek, Detlef Ronneburger - IN PROCEEDINGS OF THE 43RD IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE , 2002
"... We show that sets consisting of strings of high Kolmogorov complexity provide examples of sets that are complete for several complexity classes under probabilistic and non-uniform reductions. These sets are provably not complete under the usual many-one reductions. Let ..."
Abstract - Cited by 30 (14 self) - Add to MetaCart
We show that sets consisting of strings of high Kolmogorov complexity provide examples of sets that are complete for several complexity classes under probabilistic and non-uniform reductions. These sets are provably not complete under the usual many-one reductions. Let

The complexity of constructing pseudorandom generators from hard functions

by Emanuele Viola - Computational Complexity , 2004
"... Abstract. We study the complexity of constructing pseudorandom generators (PRGs) from hard functions, focussing on constant-depth circuits. We show that, starting from a function f: {0, 1} l → {0, 1} computable in alternating time O(l) with O(1) alternations that is hard on average (i.e. there is a ..."
Abstract - Cited by 29 (8 self) - Add to MetaCart
Abstract. We study the complexity of constructing pseudorandom generators (PRGs) from hard functions, focussing on constant-depth circuits. We show that, starting from a function f: {0, 1} l → {0, 1} computable in alternating time O(l) with O(1) alternations that is hard on average (i.e. there is a constant ɛ> 0 such that every circuit of size 2 ɛl fails to compute f on at least a 1/poly(l) fraction of inputs) we can construct a PRG: {0, 1} O(log n) → {0, 1} n computable by DLOGTIMEuniform constant-depth circuits of size polynomial in n. Such a PRG implies BP · AC 0 = AC 0 under DLOGTIME-uniformity. On the negative side, we prove that starting from a worst-case hard function f: {0, 1} l → {0, 1} (i.e. there is a constant ɛ> 0 such that every circuit of size 2 ɛl fails to compute f on some input) for every positive constant δ < 1 there is no black-box construction of a PRG: {0, 1} δn → {0, 1} n computable by constant-depth circuits of size polynomial in n. We also study worst-case hardness amplification, which is the related problem of producing an average-case hard function starting from a worst-case hard one. In particular, we deduce that there is no blackbox worst-case hardness amplification within the polynomial time hierarchy. These negative results are obtained by showing that polynomialsize constant-depth circuits cannot compute good extractors and listdecodable codes.
The National Science Foundation
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2010 The Pennsylvania State University