Results 1 
4 of
4
A thread of HOL development
 Computer Journal
"... The HOL system is a mechanized proof assistant for higher order logic that has been under continuous development since the mid1980s, by an everchanging group of developers and external contributors. We give a brief overview of various implementations of the HOL logic before focusing on the evoluti ..."
Abstract

Cited by 13 (7 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The HOL system is a mechanized proof assistant for higher order logic that has been under continuous development since the mid1980s, by an everchanging group of developers and external contributors. We give a brief overview of various implementations of the HOL logic before focusing on the evolution of certain important features available in a recent implementation. We also illustrate how the module system of Standard ML provided security and modularity in the construction of the HOL kernel, as well as serving in a separate capacity as a useful representation medium for persistent, hierarchical logical theories.
The HOL Light manual (1.1)
, 2000
"... ion is in a precise sense a converse operation to application. Given 49 50 CHAPTER 5. PRIMITIVE BASIS OF HOL LIGHT a variable x and a term t, which may or may not contain x, one can construct the socalled lambdaabstraction x: t, which means `the function of x that yields t'. (In HOL's A ..."
Abstract

Cited by 6 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
ion is in a precise sense a converse operation to application. Given 49 50 CHAPTER 5. PRIMITIVE BASIS OF HOL LIGHT a variable x and a term t, which may or may not contain x, one can construct the socalled lambdaabstraction x: t, which means `the function of x that yields t'. (In HOL's ASCII concrete syntax the backslash is used, e.g. \x. t.) For example, x: x + 1 is the function that adds one to its argument. Abstractions are not often seen in informal mathematics, but they have at least two merits. First, they allow one to write anonymous functionvalued expressions without naming them (occasionally one sees x 7! t[x] used for this purpose), and since our logic is avowedly higher order, it's desirable to place functions on an equal footing with rstorder objects in this way. Secondly, they make variable dependencies and binding explicit; by contrast in informal mathematics one often writes f(x) in situations where one really means x: f(x). We should give some idea of how ordina...
Inductive invariants for nested recursion
 Theorem Proving in Higher Order Logics (TPHOLS'03), volume 2758 of LNCS
, 2003
"... Abstract. We show that certain inputoutput relations, termed inductive invariants are of central importance for termination proofs of algorithms defined by nested recursion. Inductive invariants can be used to enhance recursive function definition packages in higherorder logic mechanizations. We d ..."
Abstract

Cited by 4 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. We show that certain inputoutput relations, termed inductive invariants are of central importance for termination proofs of algorithms defined by nested recursion. Inductive invariants can be used to enhance recursive function definition packages in higherorder logic mechanizations. We demonstrate the usefulness of inductive invariants on a large example of the BDD algorithm Apply. Finally, we introduce a related concept of inductive fixpoints with the property that for every functional in higherorder logic there exists a largest partial function that is such a fixpoint. 1
Solving Software Reuse Problems with Theorem Provers
, 1998
"... For a challenging application, the software component retrieval, we present a powerful solution by combining two systems. The NORA/HAMMRtool handles all aspects concerning with the logical representation of the application problem, the ILFtool provides an infrastructure to apply several ATPs like ..."
Abstract
 Add to MetaCart
For a challenging application, the software component retrieval, we present a powerful solution by combining two systems. The NORA/HAMMRtool handles all aspects concerning with the logical representation of the application problem, the ILFtool provides an infrastructure to apply several ATPs like SETHEO, OTTER, SPASS to the emerging deductive problems. For a fruitful practically application, however, an adjustment of application dependent parameter is advisable. The parameter settings can be obtained from a little test suite, if some general tools, already integrated in ILF, for analysation of emerged proof tasks are exploited.