Results 1 - 10
of
87
Almost Everywhere High Nonuniform Complexity
, 1992
"... . We investigate the distribution of nonuniform complexities in uniform complexity classes. We prove that almost every problem decidable in exponential space has essentially maximum circuit-size and space-bounded Kolmogorov complexity almost everywhere. (The circuit-size lower bound actually exceeds ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 158 (34 self)
- Add to MetaCart
. We investigate the distribution of nonuniform complexities in uniform complexity classes. We prove that almost every problem decidable in exponential space has essentially maximum circuit-size and space-bounded Kolmogorov complexity almost everywhere. (The circuit-size lower bound actually exceeds, and thereby strengthens, the Shannon 2 n n lower bound for almost every problem, with no computability constraint.) In exponential time complexity classes, we prove that the strongest relativizable lower bounds hold almost everywhere for almost all problems. Finally, we show that infinite pseudorandom sequences have high nonuniform complexity almost everywhere. The results are unified by a new, more powerful formulation of the underlying measure theory, based on uniform systems of density functions, and by the introduction of a new nonuniform complexity measure, the selective Kolmogorov complexity. This research was supported in part by NSF Grants CCR-8809238 and CCR-9157382 and in ...
The quantitative structure of exponential time
- Complexity theory retrospective II
, 1997
"... ABSTRACT Recent results on the internal, measure-theoretic structure of the exponential time complexity classes E and EXP are surveyed. The measure structure of these classes is seen to interact in informative ways with bi-immunity, complexity cores, polynomial-time reductions, completeness, circuit ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 85 (13 self)
- Add to MetaCart
ABSTRACT Recent results on the internal, measure-theoretic structure of the exponential time complexity classes E and EXP are surveyed. The measure structure of these classes is seen to interact in informative ways with bi-immunity, complexity cores, polynomial-time reductions, completeness, circuit-size complexity, Kolmogorov complexity, natural proofs, pseudorandom generators, the density of hard languages, randomized complexity, and lowness. Possible implications for the structure of NP are also discussed. 1
The Dimensions of Individual Strings and Sequences
- INFORMATION AND COMPUTATION
, 2003
"... A constructive version of Hausdorff dimension is developed using constructive supergales, which are betting strategies that generalize the constructive supermartingales used in the theory of individual random sequences. This constructive dimension is used to assign every individual (infinite, binary ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 77 (8 self)
- Add to MetaCart
A constructive version of Hausdorff dimension is developed using constructive supergales, which are betting strategies that generalize the constructive supermartingales used in the theory of individual random sequences. This constructive dimension is used to assign every individual (infinite, binary) sequence S a dimension, which is a real number dim(S) in the interval [0, 1]. Sequences that
Lowness Properties and Randomness
- ADVANCES IN MATHEMATICS
"... The set A is low for Martin-Lof random if each random set is already random relative to A. A is K-trivial if the prefix complexity K of each initial segment of A is minimal, namely K(n)+O(1). We show that these classes coincide. This implies answers to questions of Ambos-Spies and Kucera [2 ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 67 (18 self)
- Add to MetaCart
The set A is low for Martin-Lof random if each random set is already random relative to A. A is K-trivial if the prefix complexity K of each initial segment of A is minimal, namely K(n)+O(1). We show that these classes coincide. This implies answers to questions of Ambos-Spies and Kucera [2], showing that each low for Martin-Lof random set is # 2 . Our class induces a natural intermediate # 3 ideal in the r.e. Turing degrees (which generates the whole class under downward closure). Answering
Effective strong dimension in algorithmic information and computational complexity
- SIAM Journal on Computing
, 2004
"... The two most important notions of fractal dimension are Hausdorff dimension, developed by Hausdorff (1919), and packing dimension, developed independently by Tricot (1982) and Sullivan (1984). Both dimensions have the mathematical advantage of being defined from measures, and both have yielded exten ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 67 (27 self)
- Add to MetaCart
The two most important notions of fractal dimension are Hausdorff dimension, developed by Hausdorff (1919), and packing dimension, developed independently by Tricot (1982) and Sullivan (1984). Both dimensions have the mathematical advantage of being defined from measures, and both have yielded extensive applications in fractal geometry and dynamical systems. Lutz (2000) has recently proven a simple characterization of Hausdorff dimension in terms of gales, which are betting strategies that generalize martingales. Imposing various computability and complexity constraints on these gales produces a spectrum of effective versions of Hausdorff dimension, including constructive, computable, polynomial-space, polynomial-time, and finite-state dimensions. Work by several investigators has already used these effective dimensions to shed significant new light on a variety of topics in theoretical computer science. In this paper we show that packing dimension can also be characterized in terms of gales. Moreover, even though the usual definition of packing dimension is considerably more complex than that of Hausdorff dimension, our gale characterization of packing dimension is an exact dual
Equivalence of Measures of Complexity Classes
"... The resource-bounded measures of complexity classes are shown to be robust with respect to certain changes in the underlying probability measure. Specifically, for any real number ffi ? 0, any uniformly polynomial-time computable sequence ~ fi = (fi 0 ; fi 1 ; fi 2 ; : : : ) of real numbers (biases ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 66 (19 self)
- Add to MetaCart
The resource-bounded measures of complexity classes are shown to be robust with respect to certain changes in the underlying probability measure. Specifically, for any real number ffi ? 0, any uniformly polynomial-time computable sequence ~ fi = (fi 0 ; fi 1 ; fi 2 ; : : : ) of real numbers (biases) fi i 2 [ffi; 1 \Gamma ffi], and any complexity class C (such as P, NP, BPP, P/Poly, PH, PSPACE, etc.) that is closed under positive, polynomial-time, truth-table reductions with queries of at most linear length, it is shown that the following two conditions are equivalent. (1) C has p-measure 0 (respectively, measure 0 in E, measure 0 in E 2 ) relative to the coin-toss probability measure given by the sequence ~ fi. (2) C has p-measure 0 (respectively, measure 0 in E, measure 0 in E 2 ) relative to the uniform probability measure. The proof introduces three techniques that may be useful in other contexts, namely, (i) the transformation of an efficient martingale for one probability measu...
Minimum Description Length Induction, Bayesianism, and Kolmogorov Complexity
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
, 1998
"... The relationship between the Bayesian approach and the minimum description length approach is established. We sharpen and clarify the general modeling principles MDL and MML, abstracted as the ideal MDL principle and defined from Bayes's rule by means of Kolmogorov complexity. The basic condition un ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 60 (7 self)
- Add to MetaCart
The relationship between the Bayesian approach and the minimum description length approach is established. We sharpen and clarify the general modeling principles MDL and MML, abstracted as the ideal MDL principle and defined from Bayes's rule by means of Kolmogorov complexity. The basic condition under which the ideal principle should be applied is encapsulated as the Fundamental Inequality, which in broad terms states that the principle is valid when the data are random, relative to every contemplated hypothesis and also these hypotheses are random relative to the (universal) prior. Basically, the ideal principle states that the prior probability associated with the hypothesis should be given by the algorithmic universal probability, and the sum of the log universal probability of the model plus the log of the probability of the data given the model should be minimized. If we restrict the model class to the finite sets then application of the ideal principle turns into Kolmogorov's mi...
Cook versus Karp-Levin: Separating Completeness Notions If NP Is Not Small
- Theoretical Computer Science
, 1992
"... Under the hypothesis that NP does not have p-measure 0 (roughly, that NP contains more than a negligible subset of exponential time), it is show n that there is a language that is P T -complete ("Cook complete "), but not P m -complete ("Karp-Levin complete"), for NP. This conclusion, widely be ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 52 (12 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Under the hypothesis that NP does not have p-measure 0 (roughly, that NP contains more than a negligible subset of exponential time), it is show n that there is a language that is P T -complete ("Cook complete "), but not P m -complete ("Karp-Levin complete"), for NP. This conclusion, widely believed to be true, is not known to follow from P 6= NP or other traditional complexity-theoretic hypotheses. Evidence is presented that "NP does not have p-measure 0" is a reasonable hypothesis with many credible consequences. Additional such consequences proven here include the separation of many truthtable reducibilities in NP (e.g., k queries versus k+1 queries), the class separation E 6= NE, and the existence of NP search problems that are not reducible to the corresponding decision problems. This research was supported in part by National Science Foundation Grant CCR9157382, with matching funds from Rockwell International. 1 Introduction The NP-completeness of decision problems has...
Calibrating randomness
- J. Symbolic Logic
"... 2. Sets, measure, and martingales 4 2.1. Sets and measure 4 2.2. Martingales 5 ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 50 (29 self)
- Add to MetaCart
2. Sets, measure, and martingales 4 2.1. Sets and measure 4 2.2. Martingales 5

