A fundamental question is whether people have available one category learning system, or many. Most multiple systems advocates postulate one explicit and one implicit system. Although there is much agreement about the nature of the explicit system, there is less agreement about the nature of the implicit system. In this article, we review a dual systems theory of category learning called competition between verbal and implicit systems (COVIS) developed by Ashby et al. (1998). The explicit system dominates the learning of verbalizable, rule-based category structures and is mediated by frontal brain areas such as the anterior cingulate, prefrontal cortex (PFC), and head of the caudate nucleus. The implicit system, which uses procedural learning, dominates the learning of non-verbalizable, information-integration category structures, and is mediated by the tail of the caudate nucleus and a dopamine-mediated reward signal. We review nine studies that test six a priori predictions from COVIS, each of which is supported by the data.

Categorization is a critical skill that every organism must possess in at least a rudimentary form, because it allows organisms to respond differently, for example, to nutrients and poisons and to predators and prey. There is much recent

rule-based but not information-integration

tasks, whereas response position is learned by the procedural-learning system to solve informationintegration tasks. Accuracy rates were examined to isolate global performance deficits, and modelbased analyses were performed to identify the types of response strategies used by observers. A–B training (consistent mapping) led to more accurate responding relative to yes–no training (variable mapping) in the information-integration category learning task. Model-based analyses indicated that the yes–no accuracy decline was due to an increase in the use of rule-based strategies to solve the information-integration task. Yes–no training had no effect on the accuracy of responding or distribution of best-fitting models relative to A–B training in the rule-based category learning tasks. These results both provide support for a multiple-systems approach to category learning in which one system is procedural-learning–based and argue against the validity of single-system approaches.

A test of the predicted interaction between within-category discontinuity and verbal rule complexity on information-integration and rule-based category learning was conducted. Within-category discontinuity adversely affected information-integration category learning but not rule-based category learning. Modelbased analyses suggested that some information-integration participants improved performance by recruiting more “units ” in the discontinuous condition. Verbal rule complexity adversely affected rule-based category learning but not information-integration category learning. Model-based analyses suggested that the rule based effect was on both decision criterion learning and variability in decision criterion placement. These results suggest that within-category discontinuity and decision rule complexity differentially impact information-integration and rule-based category learning and provide information

Three experiments were conducted that provide a direct examination of within-category discontinuity manipulations on the implicit, procedural-based learning and the explicit, hypothesis-testing systems proposed in F. G. Ashby, L. A. Alfonso-Reese, A. U. Turken, and E. M. Waldron’s (1998) competition between verbal and implicit systems model. Discontinuous categories adversely affected informationintegration but not rule-based category learning. Increasing the magnitude of the discontinuity did not lead to a significant decline in performance. The distance to the bound provides a reasonable description of the generalization profile associated with the hypothesis-testing system, whereas the distance to the bound plus the distance to the trained response region provides a reasonable description of the generalization profile associated with the procedural-based learning system. These results suggest that within-category discontinuity differentially impacts information-integration but not rule-based category

Information-integration category learning was examined in older and younger adults. Accuracy results indicated that older participants learned less well than younger participants in both linear and nonlinear conditions. Model-based analyses indicated that both groups in the linear condition tended to use information integration but that later in training younger participants were more likely to do so. In contrast, the 2 groups in the nonlinear condition were equally likely to use information integration. Further analysis indicated that younger adults were more accurate than older adults when an informationintegration approach was adopted, whereas fewer age-related differences were observed when a rulebased approach was used, suggesting that age can have a negative impact on information-integration category learning processes but less impact on rule-based learning. Category learning is the cognitive process by which individuals learn to place stimuli into two or more groups. 1 This process is important for day-to-day functioning and represents a fundamental aspect of cognition. Every day we categorize hundreds of times, and throughout our lifetime we are required to learn new categories (Ashby & Maddox, 1998). For example, both children and

The authors present 2 experiments that establish the presence of knowledge partitioning in perceptual categorization. Many participants learned to rely on a context cue, which did not predict category membership but identified partial boundaries, to gate independent partial categorization strategies. When participants partitioned their knowledge, a strategy used in 1 context was unaffected by knowledge demonstrably present in other contexts. An exemplar model, attentional learning covering map, was shown to be unable to accommodate knowledge partitioning. Instead, a mixture-of-experts model, attention to rules and instances in a unified model (ATRIUM), could handle the results. The success of ATRIUM resulted from its assumption that people memorize not only exemplars but also the way in which they are to be classified. In this article, we address the representation of complex perceptual categories. Contrary to the conventional and widespread assumption that people’s representations are homogeneous and integrated, we show in two experiments that people often master a complex categorization task by forming independent components, or parcels, of knowledge. We also show that once a knowledge

Abstract not found

Models of category learning can take two different approaches to representing the relationship between objects and categories. The generative approach solves the categorization