Results 1  10
of
105
Prices and unit labor costs: A new test of price stickiness
, 1999
"... This paper investigates the predictions of a simple optimizing model of nominal price rigidity for the aggregate price level and the dynamics of inflation. I compare the model’s predictions with those of a perfectly competitive, flexible price ‘benchmark’ model (corresponding to the model of pricing ..."
Abstract

Cited by 199 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This paper investigates the predictions of a simple optimizing model of nominal price rigidity for the aggregate price level and the dynamics of inflation. I compare the model’s predictions with those of a perfectly competitive, flexible price ‘benchmark’ model (corresponding to the model of pricing assumed in standard real business cycle models), and evaluate how much the introduction of nominal rigidities improves the model’s fit with the data. The model’s predictions are derived using only the firms optimal pricing problem; taking as given the paths of nominal labor compensation, labor productivity, and output, I determine the implied path of prices predicted by the model. Because prices are not a stationary series, I present my results in terms of the predicted path of the price/unit labor cost ratio, where the parameters characterizing such paths are chosen to maximize the fit with the data. I find that, while the evolution of prices relative to unit labor costs is quite different from what would be predicted by the flexibleprice ‘benchmark ’ model, a simple model of nominal price rigidity delivers an extremely close approximation both of the price/unit labor cost ratio and of the inflation series, even under a very simple approach to the measurement of marginal costs. Moreover, the results are robust to modifications of this measure.
Resurrecting the (C)CAPM: A CrossSectional Test When Risk Premia Are TimeVarying
 Journal of Political Economy
, 2001
"... This paper explores the ability of conditional versions of the CAPM and the consumption CAPM—jointly the (C)CAPM—to explain the cross section of average stock returns. Central to our approach is the use of the log consumption–wealth ratio as a conditioning variable. We demonstrate that such conditio ..."
Abstract

Cited by 137 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This paper explores the ability of conditional versions of the CAPM and the consumption CAPM—jointly the (C)CAPM—to explain the cross section of average stock returns. Central to our approach is the use of the log consumption–wealth ratio as a conditioning variable. We demonstrate that such conditional models perform far better than unconditional specifications and about as well as the FamaFrench threefactor model on portfolios sorted by size and booktomarket characteristics. The conditional consumption CAPM can account for the difference in returns between lowbooktomarket and highbooktomarket portfolios and exhibits little evidence of residual size or booktomarket effects. We are grateful to Eugene Fama and Kenneth French for graciously providing the
What does the Yield Curve Tell us about GDP Growth?
, 2003
"... A lot, including a few things you may not expect. Previous studies find that the term spread forecasts GDP but these regressions are unconstrained and do not model regressor endogeneity. We build a dynamic model for GDP growth and yields that completely characterizes expectations of GDP. The model d ..."
Abstract

Cited by 101 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
A lot, including a few things you may not expect. Previous studies find that the term spread forecasts GDP but these regressions are unconstrained and do not model regressor endogeneity. We build a dynamic model for GDP growth and yields that completely characterizes expectations of GDP. The model does not permit arbitrage. Contrary to previous findings, we predict that the short rate has more predictive power than any term spread. We confirm this finding by forecasting GDP outofsample. The model also recommends the use of lagged GDP and the longest maturity yield to measure slope. Greater efficiency enables the yieldcurve model to produce superior outofsample GDP forecasts than unconstrained OLS at all horizons.
Valuation Ratios and the LongRun Stock Market Outlook: An Update
 Journal of Portfolio Management
, 2001
"... The use of priceearnings ratios and dividendprice ratios as forecasting variables for the stock market is examined using aggregate annual US data 1871 to 2000 and aggregate quarterly data for twelve countries since 1970. Various simple efficientmarkets models of financial markets imply that ..."
Abstract

Cited by 94 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The use of priceearnings ratios and dividendprice ratios as forecasting variables for the stock market is examined using aggregate annual US data 1871 to 2000 and aggregate quarterly data for twelve countries since 1970. Various simple efficientmarkets models of financial markets imply that these ratios should be useful in forecasting future dividend growth, future earnings growth, or future productivity growth. We conclude that, overall, the ratios do poorly in forecasting any of these.
Understanding Predictability
 JOURNAL OF POITICAL ECONOMY
, 2004
"... We propose a general equilibrium model with multiple securities in which investors’ risk preferences and expectations of dividend growth are time varying. While time varying risk preferences induce the standard positive relation between the dividend yield and expected returns, time varying expected ..."
Abstract

Cited by 86 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We propose a general equilibrium model with multiple securities in which investors’ risk preferences and expectations of dividend growth are time varying. While time varying risk preferences induce the standard positive relation between the dividend yield and expected returns, time varying expected dividend growth induces a negative relation between them. These offsetting effects reduce the ability of the dividend yield to forecast returns and eliminate its ability to forecast dividend growth, as observed in the data. The model links the predictability of returns to that of dividend growth, suggesting specific changes to standard linear predictive regressions for both. The model’s predictions are con…rmed empirically.
The Dog That Did Not Bark: A Defense of Return Predictability
, 2006
"... If returns are not predictable, dividend growth must be predictable, to generate the observed variation in divided yields. I find that the absence of dividend growth predictability gives stronger evidence than does the presence of return predictability. Longhorizon return forecasts give the same st ..."
Abstract

Cited by 71 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
If returns are not predictable, dividend growth must be predictable, to generate the observed variation in divided yields. I find that the absence of dividend growth predictability gives stronger evidence than does the presence of return predictability. Longhorizon return forecasts give the same strong evidence. These tests exploit the negative correlation of return forecasts and dividendyield autocorrelation across samples, together with sensible upper bounds on dividendyield autocorrelation, to deliver more powerful statistics. I reconcile my findings with the literature that finds poor power in longhorizon return forecasts, and with the literature that notes the poor outofsample R² of returnforecasting regressions.
Catching Up with the Joneses: Heterogeneous Preferences and the Dynamics of Asset Prices
, 2001
"... ..."
The Declining Equity Premium: What Role Does Macroeconomic Risk Play?
 THE REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES
, 2006
"... ..."
Expected stock returns and variance risk premia, working paper
, 2008
"... Motivated by the implications from a stylized selfcontained general equilibrium model incorporating the effects of timevarying economic uncertainty, we show that the difference between implied and realized variation, or the variance risk premium, is able to explain a nontrivial fraction of the ti ..."
Abstract

Cited by 47 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Motivated by the implications from a stylized selfcontained general equilibrium model incorporating the effects of timevarying economic uncertainty, we show that the difference between implied and realized variation, or the variance risk premium, is able to explain a nontrivial fraction of the time series variation in post 1990 aggregate stock market returns, with high (low) premia predicting high (low) future returns. Our empirical results depend crucially on the use of “modelfree, ” as opposed to BlackScholes, options implied volatilities, along with accurate realized variation measures constructed from highfrequency intraday, as opposed to daily, data. The magnitude of the predictability is particularly striking at the intermediate quarterly return horizon, where it easily dominates that afforded by other popular predictor variables, like the P/E ratio, the default spread, and the consumptionwealth ratio (CAY).