Results 1  10
of
11
Implementation of Interior Point Methods for Large Scale Linear Programming
 in Interior Point Methods in Mathematical Programming
, 1996
"... In the past 10 years the interior point methods (IPM) for linear programming have gained extraordinary interest as an alternative to the sparse simplex based methods. This has initiated a fruitful competition between the two types of algorithms which has lead to very efficient implementations on bot ..."
Abstract

Cited by 70 (22 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In the past 10 years the interior point methods (IPM) for linear programming have gained extraordinary interest as an alternative to the sparse simplex based methods. This has initiated a fruitful competition between the two types of algorithms which has lead to very efficient implementations on both sides. The significant difference between interior point and simplex based methods is reflected not only in the theoretical background but also in the practical implementation. In this paper we give an overview of the most important characteristics of advanced implementations of interior point methods. First, we present the infeasibleprimaldual algorithm which is widely considered the most efficient general purpose IPM. Our discussion includes various algorithmic enhancements of the basic algorithm. The only shortcoming of the "traditional" infeasibleprimaldual algorithm is to detect a possible primal or dual infeasibility of the linear program. We discuss how this problem can be solve...
A Computational View of InteriorPoint Methods for Linear Programming
 IN: ADVANCES IN LINEAR AND INTEGER PROGRAMMING
, 1994
"... Many issues that are crucial for an efficient implementation of an interior point algorithm are addressed in this paper. To start with, a prototype primaldual algorithm is presented. Next, many tricks that make it so efficient in practice are discussed in detail. Those include: the preprocessing te ..."
Abstract

Cited by 15 (10 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Many issues that are crucial for an efficient implementation of an interior point algorithm are addressed in this paper. To start with, a prototype primaldual algorithm is presented. Next, many tricks that make it so efficient in practice are discussed in detail. Those include: the preprocessing techniques, the initialization approaches, the methods of computing search directions (and lying behind them linear algebra techniques), centering strategies and methods of stepsize selection. Several reasons for the manifestations of numerical difficulties like e.g.: the primal degeneracy of optimal solutions or the lack of feasible solutions are explained in a comprehensive way. A motivation for obtaining an optimal basis is given and a practicable algorithm to perform this task is presented. Advantages of different methods to perform postoptimal analysis (applicable to interior point optimal solutions) are discussed. Important questions that still remain open in the implementations of i...
On Exploiting Problem Structure in a Basis Identification Procedure for Linear Programming
 In: INFORMS Journal on Computing
, 1997
"... During the last decade interiorpoint methods have become an efficient alternative to the simplex algorithm for solution of largescale linear programming (LP) problems. However, in many practical applications of LP, interiorpoint methods have the drawback that they do not generate an optimal basic ..."
Abstract

Cited by 5 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
During the last decade interiorpoint methods have become an efficient alternative to the simplex algorithm for solution of largescale linear programming (LP) problems. However, in many practical applications of LP, interiorpoint methods have the drawback that they do not generate an optimal basic and nonbasic partition of the variables. This partition is required in the traditional sensitivity analysis and is highly useful when a sequence of related LP problems are solved. Therefore, in this paper we discuss how an optimal basic solution can be generated from the interiorpoint solution. The emphasis of the paper is on how problem structure can be exploited to reduce the computational cost associated with the basis identification. Computational results are presented which indicate that it is highly advantageous to exploit problem structure. Key words: Linear programming, interiorpoint methods, basis identification. 1 Introduction Since the late forties the simplex algorithm has be...
A Strongly Polynomial Rounding Procedure Yielding a Maximally Complementary Solution for P*(κ) Linear Complementarity Problems
, 1998
"... We deal with Linear Complementarity Problems (LCPs) with P () matrices. First we establish the convergence rate of the complementary variables along the central path. The central path is parameterized by the barrier parameter , as usual. Our elementary proof reproduces the known result that the var ..."
Abstract

Cited by 5 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We deal with Linear Complementarity Problems (LCPs) with P () matrices. First we establish the convergence rate of the complementary variables along the central path. The central path is parameterized by the barrier parameter , as usual. Our elementary proof reproduces the known result that the variables on, or close to the central path fall apart in three classes in which these variables are O(1); O() and O( p ), respectively. The constants hidden in these bounds are expressed in, or bounded by, the input data. All this is preparation for our main result: a strongly polynomial rounding procedure. Given a point with sufficiently small complementarity gap and close enough to the central path, the rounding procedure produces a maximally complementary solution in at most O(n³) arithmetic operations. The result implies that Interior Point Methods (IPMs) not only converge to a complementary solution of P () LCPs but, when furnished with our rounding procedure, they can produce a max...
Basis and Tripartition Identification for Quadratic Programming and Linear Complementarity Problems  From an interior solution to an optimal basis and viceversa
, 1996
"... Optimal solutions of interior point algorithms for linear and quadratic programming and linear complementarity problems provide maximal complementary solutions. Maximal complementary solutions can be characterized by optimal (tri)partitions. On the other hand, the solutions provided by simplexb ..."
Abstract

Cited by 3 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Optimal solutions of interior point algorithms for linear and quadratic programming and linear complementarity problems provide maximal complementary solutions. Maximal complementary solutions can be characterized by optimal (tri)partitions. On the other hand, the solutions provided by simplexbased pivot algorithms are given in terms of complementary bases. A basis identification algorithm is an algorithm which generates a complementary basis, starting from any complementary solution. A tripartition identification algorithm is an algorithm which generates a maximal complementary solution (and its corresponding tripartition), starting from any complementary solution. In linear programming such algorithms were respectively proposed by Megiddo in 1991 and Balinski and Tucker in 1969. In this paper we will present identification algorithms for quadratic programming and linear complementarity problems with sufficient matrices. The presented algorithms are based on the principal...
A Stable PrimalDual Approach for Linear Programming
"... This paper studies a primaldual interior/exteriorpoint pathfollowing approach for linearprogramming that is motivated on using an iterative solver rather than a direct solver for the search direction. We begin with the usual perturbed primaldual optimality equations Fu(x, y, z) = 0. Under nonde ..."
Abstract

Cited by 2 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This paper studies a primaldual interior/exteriorpoint pathfollowing approach for linearprogramming that is motivated on using an iterative solver rather than a direct solver for the search direction. We begin with the usual perturbed primaldual optimality equations Fu(x, y, z) = 0. Under nondegeneracy assumptions, this nonlinear system is wellposed,i.e. it has a nonsingular Jacobian at optimality and is not necessarily illconditioned as the iterates approach optimality. We use a simple preprocessing step to eliminate boththe primal and dual feasibility equations. This results in a single bilinear equation that maintains the wellposedness property. We then apply both a direct solution techniqueas well as a preconditioned conjugate gradient method (PCG), within an inexact Newton framework, directly on the linearized equations. This is done without forming the usualnormal equations, NEQ, or augmented system. Sparsity is maintained. The work of aniteration for the PCG approach consists almost entirely in the (approximate) solution of this wellposed linearized system. Therefore, improvements depend on efficient preconditioning.
EXPERIMENTS WITH A HYBRID INTERIOR POINT/COMBINATORIAL APPROACH FOR NETWORK FLOW PROBLEMS
"... Interior Point (IP) algorithms for Min Cost Flow (MCF) problems have been shown to be competitive with combinatorial approaches, at least on some problem classes and for very large instances. This is in part due to availability of specialized crossover routines for MCF; these allow early termination ..."
Abstract

Cited by 2 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Interior Point (IP) algorithms for Min Cost Flow (MCF) problems have been shown to be competitive with combinatorial approaches, at least on some problem classes and for very large instances. This is in part due to availability of specialized crossover routines for MCF; these allow early termination of the IP approach, sparing it with the final iterations where the KKT systems become more difficult to solve. As the crossover procedures are nothing but combinatorial approaches to MCF that are only allowed to perform few iterations, the IP algorithm can be seen as a complex “multiple crash start ” routine for the combinatorial ones. We report our experiments about allowing one primaldual combinatorial algorithm to MCF to perform as many iterations as required to solve the problem after being warmstarted by an IP approach. Our results show that the efficiency of the combined approach critically depends on the accurate selection of a set of parameters among very many possible ones, for which designing accurate guidelines appears not to be an easy task; however, they also show that the combined approach can be competitive with the original combinatorial algorithm, at least on some “difficult” instances.
Effective Finite Termination Procedures in InteriorPoint Methods for Linear Programming
 Hidas, Peter (1999): ‘Mission Impossible’. ComputerWorld Norge
, 1998
"... Due to the structure of the solution set an exact solution to... bounds are incorporated into the model to prevent the computed solution from violating the bound constraints. Theory in the literature is extended to the new model. Empirical evidence shows that the proposed model reduces the number of ..."
Abstract

Cited by 1 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Due to the structure of the solution set an exact solution to... bounds are incorporated into the model to prevent the computed solution from violating the bound constraints. Theory in the literature is extended to the new model. Empirical evidence shows that the proposed model reduces the number of projection attempts needed to find an exact solution. When early termination is the goal, projection from a pure composite Newton step is advocated. However, the cost may exceed the benefits due to the average need of more than one projection attempt to find an exact solution. Variants of Mehrotra's predictorcorrector primaldual interiorpoint algorithm provide the foundation for most practical interiorpoint codes. To take advantage of all available algorithmic information, we investigate the behavior of the Tapia predictorcorrector indicator, which incorporates the corrector step, to identify the optimal partition. Globally, the Tapia predictorcorrector indicator behaves poorly as do all indicators, but locally exhibits fast convergence.
Numerical Stability in Linear Programming and Semidefinite Programming
, 2006
"... We study numerical stability for interiorpoint methods applied to Linear Programming, LP, and Semidefinite Programming, SDP. We analyze the di#culties inherent in current methods and present robust algorithms. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 1 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We study numerical stability for interiorpoint methods applied to Linear Programming, LP, and Semidefinite Programming, SDP. We analyze the di#culties inherent in current methods and present robust algorithms.
Evaluations of the 1997 Spend a Summer with a Scientist Program
"... There are several models that predict ambient (ground level) ozone pollution by transforming the data. However, transformations sometime increase prediction error. Our goal is to directly model ambient ozone levels in regions located away from monitoring stations. Our objective is not to predict fut ..."
Abstract
 Add to MetaCart
There are several models that predict ambient (ground level) ozone pollution by transforming the data. However, transformations sometime increase prediction error. Our goal is to directly model ambient ozone levels in regions located away from monitoring stations. Our objective is not to predict future ozone levels. Some Key Words: Multivariate skewnormal distribution; Bivariate skewnormal distribution; Ambient ozone. __________________________________ * Research supported by the Center for Research and Parallel Computation, Rice University, Houston, Texas ** Graduate Student, Department of Statistics, Rice University, Houston, Texas Introduction Ambient ozone (O 3 ) pollution is a major environmental problem in many metropolitan areas in this country. In particular, the Houston, Texas area is second to Los Angeles in nationwide ambient air quality (Carroll, Chen, George, Li, Newton, Schmiediche and Wang, 1997). There are several models for estimating O 3 , however, many modeling...