... This paper draws upon experiences gained during the development of programs which search chess game trees. Over the past decade major enhancements to the alpha-beta algorithm have been developed by people building game-playing programs, and many of these methods will be surveyed and compared here. The balance of the paper contains a study of contemporary methods for searching chess game trees in parallel, using an arbitrary number of independent processors. To make efficient use of these processors, one must have a clear understanding of the basic properties of the trees actually traversed when alpha-beta cutoffs occur. This paper provides such insights and concludes with a brief description of our own refinement to a standard parallel search algorithm for this problem.

We present an overview of the program transformation methodology, focusing our attention on the so-called `rules + strategies' approach in the case of functional and logic programs. The paper is intended to offer an introduction to the subject. The various techniques we present are illustrated via simple examples. A preliminary version of this report has been published in: Moller, B., Partsch, H., and Schuman, S. (eds.): Formal Program Development. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 755, Springer Verlag (1993) 263--304. Also published in: ACM Computing Surveys, Vol 28, No. 2, June 1996. 3 1 Introduction The program transformation approach to the development of programs has first been advocated by [Burstall-Darlington 77], although the basic ideas were already presented in previous papers by the same authors [Darlington 72, Burstall-Darlington 75]. In that approach the task of writing a correct and efficient program is realized in two phases: the first phase consists in writing an in...

Garbage collection can be done in vector mode on supercomputers like the Cray-2 and the Cyber 205. Both copying collection and mark-and-sweep can be expressed as breadth-first searches in which the "queue" can be processed in parallel. We have designed a copying garbage collector whose inner loop works entirely in vector mode. We give performance measurements of the algorithm as implemented for Lisp CONS cells on the Cyber 205. Vector-mode garbage collection performs up to 9 times faster than scalar-mode collection --- a worthwhile improvement. - 1. Automatic garbage collection on vector supercomputers Languages like Lisp with dynamic storage allocation and automatic garbage collection are increasingly being used on vector supercomputers. Implementations of Lisp have been done for Cray supercomputers [1], and fully supported supercomputer Lisp environments will soon be available (e.g. Common Lisp provided by Cray Research and Franz, Inc.)[2]. This is a natural development. Languages ...

A systematic approach is given for deriving incremental programs that exploit caching. The cache-and-prune method presented in the article consists of three stages: (I) the original program is extended to cache the results of all its intermediate subcomputations as well as the final result, (II) the extended program is incrementalized so that computation on a new input can use all intermediate results on an old input, %using existing techniques, and (III) unused results cached by the extended program and maintained by the incremental program are pruned away, leaving a pruned extended program that caches only useful intermediate results and a pruned incremental program that uses and maintains only the useful results. All three stages utilize static analyses and semantics-preserving transformations. Stages I and III are simple, clean, and fully automatable. The overall method has a kind of optimality with respect to the techniques used in Stage II. The method can be applied straightforwardly to provide a systematic approach to program improvement via caching.

Program transformation is a means to formally develop efficient programs from lucid specifications. A representative sample of the diverse range of program transformation research is classified into several different approaches based upon the motivations for and styles of constructing such formal developments. Individual techniques for supporting construction of developments are also surveyed, and are related to the various approaches.

We present a framework for applying memoization selectively. The framework provides programmer control over equality, space usage, and identification of precise dependences so that memoization can be applied according to the needs of an application. Two key properties of the framework are that it is efficient and yields programs whose performance can be analyzed using standard techniques. We describe the framework in the context of a functional language and an implementation as an SML library. The language is based on a modal type system and allows the programmer to express programs that reveal their true data dependences when executed. The SML implementation cannot support this modal type system statically, but instead employs run-time checks to ensure correct usage of primitives.

A systematic approach is given for deriving incremental programs from non-incremental programs written in a standard functional programming language. We exploit a number of program analysis and transformation techniques and domain-specific knowledge, centered around effective utilization of caching, in order to provide a degree of incrementality not otherwise achievable by a generic incremental evaluator. 1 Introduction Incremental programs take advantage of repeated computations on inputs that differ only slightly from one another, avoiding unnecessary duplication of common computations. Given a program f and a certain input change \Phi, a program f 0 that computes the value of f(x \Phi y) efficiently by making use of the value of f(x) is called an incremental version of f under \Phi. The parameter y can be regarded as a change ffix to the input x. Methods of incremental computation have widespread applications, e.g., loop optimizations in optimizing compilers [1, 24, 9, 10] and ...

Abstract not found

Tupling is a well-known transformation tactic to obtain new efficient recursive functions by grouping some recursive functions into a tuple. It may be applied to eliminate multiple traversals over the common data structure. The major difficulty in tupling transformation is to find what functions are to be tupled and how to transform the tupled function into an efficient one. Previous approaches to tupling transformation are essentially based on fold/unfold transformation. Though general, they suffer from the high cost of keeping track of function calls to avoid infinite unfolding, which prevents them from being used in a compiler. To remedy this situation, we propose a new method to expose recursive structures in recursive definitions and show how this structural information can be explored for calculating out efficient programs by means of tupling. Our new tupling calculation algorithm can eliminate most of multiple data traversals and is easy to be implemented. 1 Introduction Tupli...

ion versus efficiency For concreteness, let us first examine a number of examples of the type of optimisation that we wish to capture, and the kind of programs on which they operate. This will give us a specific aim when developing the machinery for automating the process, and a yardstick for evaluating our results. 2.1 Minimum depth of a tree Consider the data type of leaf labelled binary trees: dataBtreea = Leaf a j Bin (Btree a)(Btree a) The minimum depth of such a tree is returned by the function mindepth :: Btree a ! Int : mindepth (Leaf a) = 0 mindepth (Bin s t) = min (mindepth s)(mindepth t) + 1 This program is clear, but rather inefficient. It traverses the whole tree, regardless of leaves that may occur at a small depth. A better program would keep track of the `minimum depth so far', and never explore subtrees beyond that current best solution. One possible implementation of that idea is mindepth t = md t 01 md (Leaf a)d m = mindm md (Bin s t)d m = if d 0 m then m...