Results 1 - 10
of
80
The unbearable automaticity of being
- American Psychologist
, 1999
"... What was noted by E. J. hanger (1978) remains true today: that much of contemporary psychological research is based on the assumption that people are consciously and systematically processing incoming information in order to construe and interpret their world and to plan and engage in courses of act ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 99 (4 self)
- Add to MetaCart
What was noted by E. J. hanger (1978) remains true today: that much of contemporary psychological research is based on the assumption that people are consciously and systematically processing incoming information in order to construe and interpret their world and to plan and engage in courses of action. As did E. J. hanger, the authors question this assumption. First, they review evidence that the ability to exercise such conscious, intentional control is actually quite limited, so that most of moment-to-moment psychological life must occur through nonconscious means if it is to occur at all. The authors then describe the different possible mechanisms that produce automatic, environmental control over these various phenomena and review evidence establishing both the existence of these mechanisms as well as their consequences for judgments, emotions, and
A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality
- American psychologist
, 2003
"... Early studies of intuitive judgment and decision making conducted with the late Amos Tversky are reviewed in the context of two related concepts: an analysis of accessibility, the ease with which thoughts come to mind; a distinction between effortless intuition and deliberate reasoning. Intuitive th ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 58 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Early studies of intuitive judgment and decision making conducted with the late Amos Tversky are reviewed in the context of two related concepts: an analysis of accessibility, the ease with which thoughts come to mind; a distinction between effortless intuition and deliberate reasoning. Intuitive thoughts, like percepts, are highly accessible. Determinants and consequences of accessibility help explain the central results of prospect theory, framing effects, the heuristic process of attribute substitution, and the characteristic biases that result from the substitution of nonextensional for extensional attributes. Variations in the accessibility of rules explain the occasional corrections of intuitive judgments. The study of biases is compatible with a view of intuitive thinking and decision making as generally skilled and successful.
Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: A complementary-learning-systems approach
- Psychological Review
, 2003
"... We present a computational neural network model of recognition memory based on the biological structures of the hippocampus and medial temporal lobe cortex (MTLC), which perform complementary learning functions. The hippocampal component of the model contributes to recognition by recalling specific ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 50 (10 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We present a computational neural network model of recognition memory based on the biological structures of the hippocampus and medial temporal lobe cortex (MTLC), which perform complementary learning functions. The hippocampal component of the model contributes to recognition by recalling specific studied details. MTLC can not support recall, but it is possible to extract a scalar familiarity signal from MTLC that tracks how well the test item matches studied items. We present simulations that establish key qualitative differences in the operating characteristics of the hippocampal recall and MTLC familiarity signals, and we identify several manipulations (e.g., target-lure similarity, interference) that differentially affect the two signals. We also use the model to address the stochastic relationship between recall and familiarity (i.e., are they independent), and the effects of partial vs. complete hippocampal
Can Sequence Learning Be Implicit? New Evidence With . . .
"... Can we learn without awareness? Although this issue has been extensively explored through studies of implicit learning, there is currently no agreement about the extent to which knowledge can be acquired and projected onto performance in an unconscious way. The controversy, like that surrounding imp ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 28 (13 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Can we learn without awareness? Although this issue has been extensively explored through studies of implicit learning, there is currently no agreement about the extent to which knowledge can be acquired and projected onto performance in an unconscious way. The controversy, like that surrounding implicit memory, seems to be at least in part attributable to unquestioned acceptance of the unrealistic assumption that tasks are process-pure, that is, that a given task exclusively involves either implicit or explicit knowledge. Methods such as the Process Dissociation Procedure (PDP, Jacoby, 1991) have been developed to overcome the conceptual limitations of the process purity assumption, but have seldom been used in the context of implicit learning research. In this paper, we show how the PDP can be applied to a free generation task so as to disentangle explicit and implicit sequence learning. Our results indicate that participants who are denied preparation to the next stimulus nevertheless exhibit knowledge of the sequence through their reaction time performance despite remaining unable (1) to project this knowledge in a recognition task and (2) to refrain from expressing their knowledge when specifically instructed to do so. These findings provide strong evidence that sequence learning can be unconscious.
When Keeping in Mind Supports Later Bringing to Mind: Neural Markers of Phonological Rehearsal Predict Subsequent Remembering
- J Cog Neurosci
, 2001
"... The ability to bring to mind a past experience depends on the cognitive and neural processes that are engaged during the experience and that support memory formation. A central and much debated question is whether the processes that underlie rote verbal rehearsal---that is, working memory mechanisms ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 18 (4 self)
- Add to MetaCart
The ability to bring to mind a past experience depends on the cognitive and neural processes that are engaged during the experience and that support memory formation. A central and much debated question is whether the processes that underlie rote verbal rehearsal---that is, working memory mechanisms that keep information in mind---impact memory formation and subsequent remembering. The present study used eventrelated functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to explore the relation between working memory maintenance operations and long-term memory. Specifically, we investigated whether the magnitude of activation in neural regions supporting the on-line maintenance of verbal codes is predictive of subsequent memory for words that were roterehearsed during learning. Furthermore, during rote rehearsal, the extent of neural activation in regions associated with semantic retrieval was assessed to determine the role that incidental semantic elaboration may play in subsequent memory for rote-rehearsed items. Results revealed that (a) the magnitude of activation in neural regions previously associated with phonological rehearsal (left prefrontal, bilateral parietal, supplementary motor, and cerebellar regions) was correlated with subsequent memory, and (b) while rote rehearsal did not---on average---elicit activation in an anterior left prefrontal region associated with semantic retrieval, activation in this region was greater for trials that were subsequently better remembered. Contrary to the prevalent view that rote rehearsal does not impact learning, these data suggest that phonological maintenance mechanisms, in addition to semantic elaboration, support the encoding of an experience such that it can be later remembered. &
Word frequency, repetition, and lexicality effects in word recognition tasks: Beyond measures of central tendency
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
, 1999
"... Response time (RT) distributions obtained from 3 word recognition experiments were analyzed by fitting an ex-Gaussian function to the empirical data to determine the main effects and interactive influences of word frequency, repetition, and lexicality on the nature of the underlying distributions. T ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 16 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Response time (RT) distributions obtained from 3 word recognition experiments were analyzed by fitting an ex-Gaussian function to the empirical data to determine the main effects and interactive influences of word frequency, repetition, and lexicality on the nature of the underlying distributions. The ex-Gaussian analysis allows one to determine if a manipulation simply shifts the response time (RT) distribution, produces a skewing of the RT distribution, or both. In contrast to naming performance, the lexical decision results indicated that the main effects and interactions of word frequency, repetition, and lexicality primarily reflect increased skewing of the RT distributions, as opposed to simple shifts of the RT distributions. The implications of the results were interpreted within a hybrid 2-stage model of lexical decision performance. One of the most robust, and probably least surprising, empirical observations in the word recognition literature is that the frequency of exposure to a word modulates the ease with which that word is processed in the future. This phenomenon is reflected in both the word-frequency effect in which extant word-frequency counts (e.g., Kucera & Francis, 1967, norms) predict lexical decision and naming
Mapping Cognition to the Brain Through Neural Interactions
- Memory
, 1999
"... Brain imaging methods, such as positron emission tomography (PET) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), provide a unique opportunity to study the neurobiology of human memory. Since these methods can measure most of the brain, it is possible to examine the operations of large-scale neura ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 16 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Brain imaging methods, such as positron emission tomography (PET) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), provide a unique opportunity to study the neurobiology of human memory. Since these methods can measure most of the brain, it is possible to examine the operations of large-scale neural systems and their relation to cognition. Two neuroimaging studies, one concerning working memory and the other episodic memory retrieval, serve as examples of application of two analytic methods that are optimized for the quantification of neural systems, structural equation modeling and partial least squares. Structural equation modeling was used to explore shifting prefrontal and limbic interactions from the right to the left hemisphere in a delayed match-to-sample task for faces. A feature of the functional network for short delays was strong right hemisphere interactions between hippocampus, inferior prefrontal, and anterior cingulate cortices. At longer delays, these same three areas were strongly linked, but in the left hemisphere, which was interpreted as reflecting change in task strategy from perceptual to elaborate encoding with increasing delay. The primary manipulation in the memory retrieval study was different levels of retrieval success. Partial least squares was used to determine whether the image-wide pattern of covariances of Brodmann areas 10 and 45/47 in right prefrontal cortex (RPFC) and the left hippocampus (LGH) could be mapped on to retrieval levels. Area 10 and LGH showed an opposite pattern of functional connectivity with a large expanse of bilateral limbic cortices that was equivalent for all levels of retrieval as well as the baseline task. However, only during high retrieval area 45/47 was included in this pattern. The results suggest that activ...
Comparing direct and indirect measures of sequence learning
- Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition
, 1996
"... Comparing the sensitivity of similar direct and indirect measures is proposed as the best way to provide evidence for unconscious learning. The authors apply this approach, first proposed by E. M. Reingold and P. M. Merikle (1988), to a choice reaction-time task in which the material is generated pr ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 15 (10 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Comparing the sensitivity of similar direct and indirect measures is proposed as the best way to provide evidence for unconscious learning. The authors apply this approach, first proposed by E. M. Reingold and P. M. Merikle (1988), to a choice reaction-time task in which the material is generated probabilistically on the basis of a finite-state grammar (A. Cleeremans, 1993). The data show that participants can learn about the structure of the stimulus material over training with the choice reaction-time task, but only to a limited extent—a result that is well predicted by the simple recurrent network model of A. Cleeremans and J. L. McClelland (1991). Participants can also use some of this knowledge to perform a subsequent generation task. However, detailed partial correlational analyses that control for knowledge as assessed by the generation task show that large effects of sequence learning are exclusively expressed through reaction time. This result suggests that at least some of this learning cannot be characterized as conscious. Over the last 10 years, interest in human learning has steadily increased, thanks in part to the development of connectionism and to renewed attention to the cognitive unconscious (Reber, 1993). Indeed, there is now a large body
Two-Process Models of Recognition Memory: Evidence for Recall-to-Reject?
- Journal of Memory and Language
, 1999
"... this paper. In the General Discussion we will consider how a one-process model might accommodate the results as well. However, next we continue with our main purpose, which is to contribute to the exposition of two-process models by analyzing data within this framework, in particular by assessing th ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 14 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
this paper. In the General Discussion we will consider how a one-process model might accommodate the results as well. However, next we continue with our main purpose, which is to contribute to the exposition of two-process models by analyzing data within this framework, in particular by assessing the recall-toreject account

