Number sense " is a short-hand for our ability to quickly understand, approximate, and manipulate numerical quantities. My hypothesis is that number sense rests on cerebral circuits that have evolved specifically for the purpose of representing basic arithmetic knowledge. Four lines of evidence suggesting that number sense constitutes a domain-specific, biologically-determined ability are reviewed: the presence of evolutionary precursors of arithmetic in animals; the early emergence of arithmetic competence in infants independently of other abilities, including language; the existence of a homology between the animal, infant, and human adult abilities for number processing ; and the existence of a dedicated cerebral substrate. In adults of all cultures, lesions to the inferior parietal region can specifically impair number sense while leaving the knowledge of other cognitive domains intact. Furthermore, this region is demonstrably activated during number processing. I postulate that higher-level cultural developments in arithmetic emerge through the establishment of linkages between this core analogical representation (the " number line ") and other verbal and visual representations of number notations. The neural and cognitive organization of those representations can explain why some mathematical concepts are intuitive, while others are so difficult to grasp. Thus, the ultimate foundations of mathematics rests on core representations that have been internalized in our brains through evolution.

Did evolution endow the human brain with a predisposition to represent and acquire knowledge about numbers? Although the parietal lobe...

In non-verbal counting tasks derived from the animal literature, adult human subjects repeatedly attempted to produce target numbers of key presses at rates that made vocal or subvocal counting difficult or impossible. In a second task, they estimated the number of flashes in a rapid, randomly timed sequence. Congruent with the animal data, mean estimates in both tasks were proportional to target values, as was the variability in the estimates. Converging evidence makes it unlikely that subjects used verbal counting or time durations to perform these tasks. The results support the hypothesis that adult humans share with non-verbal animals a system for representing number by magnitudes that have scalar variability (a constant coefficient of variation). The mapping of numerical symbols to mental magnitudes provides a formal model of the underlying non-verbal meaning of the symbols (a model of numerical semantics). Animal subjects represent both number and duration by mental magnitudes (Church, 1984; Gibbon, Church, & Meck, 1984; Meck & Church, 1983). These representations are formally analogous to points on the real number line. Meck and Church (1983) proposed such a representation to account for animal non-verbal counts of objects or events (Figure 1). According to their theory each item is enumerated by an impulse of activation which is added to an accumulator. The magnitude in the accumulator at the end of the count is read into memory, where it represents the number of the counted set. The noise (trial-to-trial variability) in these remembered magnitudes is proportional to the magnitude, a property that Gibbon (1977) called scalar variability . Mathematical modeling of psychophysical data from a variety of tasks indicates that memory is the dominant source of trial-...

INTRODUCTION How do we go from seeing a word to accessing its meaning? Classical models of word processing postulate that words are initially recognized in modalityspecific input lexicons before contacting a common semantic representation (Caramazza, 1996; Morton, 1979). This predicts that areas which are engaged in semantic-level processing should activate in direct correlation with the amount of semantic manipulation required by the task and do so independent of the modality of presentation of the concept (Chao et al., 2000; Perani et al., 1999; Vandenberghe et al., 1996). Here, we attempt to identify the cerebral areas engaged in the coding and internal manipulation of an abstract semantic content, the meaning of number words. Although numbers can be written in multiple notations, such as words or digits, the parietal lobes are thought to comprise a notation-independent representation of their semantic content as quantities. According to the "triple-code model" of number process

We measured cerebral activation with functional magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla while eight healthy volunteers performed various number processing tasks known to be dissociable in brain-lesioned patients: naming, comparing, multiplying, or subtracting single digits. The results revealed the activation of a circuit comprising bilateral intraparietal, prefrontal, and anterior cingulate components. The extension and lateralization of this circuit was modulated by task demands. The intraparietal and prefrontal activation was more important in the right hemisphere during the comparison task and in the left hemisphere during the multiplication task and was intensely bilateral during the subtraction task. Thus, partially distinct cerebral circuits with the dorsal parietal pathway underlie distinct arithmetic operations.

Abstract not found

It is proposed that arithmetical facts are organized in memory in terms of a principle that is unique to numbers—the cardinal magnitudes of the addends. This implies that sums such as 4 + 2 and 2+4are represented, and searched for, in terms of the maximum and minimum addends. This in turn implies that a critical stage in solving an addition problem is deciding which addend is the larger. The COMP model of addition fact retrieval incorporates a comparison stage, as well as a retrieval stage and a pronunciation stage. Three tasks, using the same subjects, were designed to assess the contribution of these three stages to retrieving the answers to single-digit addition problems. Task 3 was the addition task, which examined whether reaction times (RTs) were explained by the model; Task 1 was a number naming task to assess the contribution of the pronunciation stage; Task 2 was a magnitude comparison task to assess the contribution, if any, of the comparison stage. A regression equation that included just expressions of these three stages was found to account for 71 % of the variance. It is argued that the COMP model fits not only the adult RT data better than do alternatives, but also the evidence from development of additional skills. The basic phenomena involved in single-digit addition performance are robust, widely replicated and well known, yet there has been much controversy as to the psychological processes

INTRODUCTION The goal of the present work is to examine whether the semantic representations of numbers and body parts are associated with partially distinct cortical territories. Clinical and cognitive neuropsychology studies associate semantic deficits in both domains to lesions coarsely localized to the left parietal lobe (McCarthy and Warrington, 1990). Furthermore, patients with left inferior parietal lesions often exhibit simultaneous deficits for numbers and body parts (Benton, 1992; Gerstmann, 1940). Such an association of neuropsychological deficits is however notoriously ambiguous, and has been the subject of much debate. It might suggest that there is a shared substrate for numbers and body parts in the left parietal region, perhaps based on a common functional system for spatial representation and manipulation (Gerstmann, 1940) or on the crucial role that finger counting plays in numerical development (Butterworth, 1999). However, it might also reflect the existence of dis

Abstract not found

and number