Results 1  10
of
28
Separating microstructure noise from volatility
, 2006
"... There are two variance components embedded in the returns constructed using high frequency asset prices: the timevarying variance of the unobservable efficient returns that would prevail in a frictionless economy and the variance of the equally unobservable microstructure noise. Using sample moment ..."
Abstract

Cited by 64 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
There are two variance components embedded in the returns constructed using high frequency asset prices: the timevarying variance of the unobservable efficient returns that would prevail in a frictionless economy and the variance of the equally unobservable microstructure noise. Using sample moments of high frequency return data recorded at different frequencies, we provide a simple and robust technique to identify both variance components. In the context of a volatilitytiming trading strategy, we show that careful (optimal) separation of the two volatility components of the observed stock returns yields substantial utility gains.
Maximum likelihood estimation for stochastic volatility models
 JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS
, 2007
"... We develop and implement a method for maximum likelihood estimation in closedform of stochastic volatility models. Using Monte Carlo simulations, we compare a full likelihood procedure, where an option price is inverted into the unobservable volatility state, to an approximate likelihood procedure ..."
Abstract

Cited by 48 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We develop and implement a method for maximum likelihood estimation in closedform of stochastic volatility models. Using Monte Carlo simulations, we compare a full likelihood procedure, where an option price is inverted into the unobservable volatility state, to an approximate likelihood procedure where the volatility state is replaced by proxies based on the implied volatility of a shortdated atthemoney option. The approximation results in a small loss of accuracy relative to the standard errors due to sampling noise. We apply this method to market prices of index options for several stochastic volatility models, and compare the characteristics of the estimated models. The evidence for a general CEV model, which nests both the affine Heston model and a GARCH model, suggests that the elasticity of variance of volatility lies between that assumed by the two nested models.
2003), “Correcting the Errors: Volatility Forecast Evaluation Using HighFrequency Data and Realized Volatilities,” working paper
"... We develop general modelfree adjustment procedures for the calculation of unbiased volatility loss functions based on practically feasible realized volatility benchmarks. The procedures, which exploit the recent nonparametric asymptotic distributional results in BarndorffNielsen and Shephard (200 ..."
Abstract

Cited by 41 (11 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We develop general modelfree adjustment procedures for the calculation of unbiased volatility loss functions based on practically feasible realized volatility benchmarks. The procedures, which exploit the recent nonparametric asymptotic distributional results in BarndorffNielsen and Shephard (2002a) along with new results explicitly allowing for leverage effects, are both easytoimplement and highly accurate in empirically realistic situations. On properly accounting for the measurement errors in the volatility forecast evaluations reported in Andersen, Bollerslev, Diebold and Labys (2003), the adjustments result in markedly higher estimates for the true degree of return volatility predictability.
Financial asset returns, directionofchange forecasting and volatility dynamics
, 2003
"... informs doi 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0520 ..."
Impact of Jumps on Returns and Realised Variances: Econometric analysis of timedeformed Lévy processes
 Journal of Econometrics
, 2004
"... In order to assess the e#ect of jumps on realised variance calculations, we study some of the econometric properties of timechanged Levy processes. We show that in general realised variance is an inconsistent estimator of the timechange, however we can derive the second order properties of real ..."
Abstract

Cited by 13 (11 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In order to assess the e#ect of jumps on realised variance calculations, we study some of the econometric properties of timechanged Levy processes. We show that in general realised variance is an inconsistent estimator of the timechange, however we can derive the second order properties of realised variances and use these to estimate the parameters of such models. Our analytic results give a first indication of the degrees of inconsistency of realised variance as an estimator of the timechange in the nonBrownian case. Further, our results suggest volatility is even more predictable than has been shown by the recent econometric work on realised variance.
The Econometrics of Option Pricing
"... The growth of the option pricing literature parallels the spectacular developments of derivative securities and the rapid expansion of markets for derivatives in the last three decades. Writing a survey of option pricing models appears therefore like a formidable task. To delimit our focus we will ..."
Abstract

Cited by 12 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The growth of the option pricing literature parallels the spectacular developments of derivative securities and the rapid expansion of markets for derivatives in the last three decades. Writing a survey of option pricing models appears therefore like a formidable task. To delimit our focus we will put emphasis on the more recent contributions since there are
Stochastic Volatility
, 2005
"... Stochastic volatility (SV) is the main concept used in the fields of financial economics and mathematical finance to deal with the endemic timevarying volatility and codependence found in financial markets. Such dependence has been known for a long time, early comments include Mandelbrot (1963) and ..."
Abstract

Cited by 12 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Stochastic volatility (SV) is the main concept used in the fields of financial economics and mathematical finance to deal with the endemic timevarying volatility and codependence found in financial markets. Such dependence has been known for a long time, early comments include Mandelbrot (1963) and Officer (1973). It was also clear to the founding fathers of modern continuous time finance that homogeneity was an unrealistic if convenient simplification, e.g. Black and Scholes (1972, p. 416) wrote “... there is evidence of nonstationarity in the variance. More work must be done to predict variances using the information available. ” Heterogeneity has deep implications for the theory and practice of financial economics and econometrics. In particular, asset pricing theory is dominated by the idea that higher rewards may be expected when we face higher risks, but these risks change through time in complicated ways. Some of the changes in the level of risk can be modelled stochastically, where the level of volatility and degree of codependence between assets is allowed to change over time. Such models allow us to explain, for example, empirically observed departures from BlackScholesMerton prices for options and understand why we should expect to see occasional dramatic moves in financial markets. The outline of this article is as follows. In section 2 I will trace the origins of SV and provide links with the basic models used today in the literature. In section 3 I will briefly discuss some of the innovations in the second generation of SV models. In section 4 I will briefly discuss the literature on conducting inference for SV models. In section 5 I will talk about the use of SV to price options. In section 6 I will consider the connection of SV with realised volatility. A extensive reviews of this literature is given in Shephard (2005). 2 The origin of SV models The origins of SV are messy, I will give five accounts, which attribute the subject to different sets of people.
Realized Volatility Forecasting and Market Microstructure Noise
, 2009
"... We extend the analytical results for reduced form realized volatility based forecasting in Andersen, Bollerslev and Meddahi (2004) to allow for market microstructure frictions in the observed highfrequency returns. Our results build on the eigenfunction representation of the general stochastic vola ..."
Abstract

Cited by 9 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We extend the analytical results for reduced form realized volatility based forecasting in Andersen, Bollerslev and Meddahi (2004) to allow for market microstructure frictions in the observed highfrequency returns. Our results build on the eigenfunction representation of the general stochastic volatility class of models developed by Meddahi (2001). In addition to traditional realized volatility measures and the role of the underlying sampling frequencies, we also explore the forecasting performance of several alternative volatility measures designed to mitigate the impact of the microstructure noise. Our analysis is facilitated by a simple unified quadratic form representation for all these estimators. Our results suggest that the detrimental impact of the noise on forecast accuracy can be substantial. Moreover, the linear forecasts based on a simpletoimplement ‘average’ (or ‘subsampled’) estimator obtained by averaging standard sparsely sampled realized volatility measures generally performs on par with the best alternative robust measures.