This paper proposes a methodology for the valuation of contingent securities. In particular, it establishes how the characteristic function (of the future uncertainty) is basis augmenting and spans the payoff universe of most, if not all, derivative assets. In one specific application, from the characteristic function of the state-price density, it is possible to analytically price options on any arbitrary transformation of the underlying uncertainty. By differentiating (or translating) the characteristic function, limitless pricing and/or spanning opportunities can be designed. As made lucid via example contingent claims, by exploiting the unifying spanning concept, the valuation approach affords substantial analytical tractability. The strength and versatility of the methodology is inherent when valuing (1) Average-interest options; (2) Correlation options; and (3) Discretely-monitored knock-out options. For each option-like security, the characteristic function is strikingly simple (although the corresponding density is unmanageable/indeterminate). This article provides the economic foundations for valuing derivative securities.

This paper develops an arbitrage-free time-series model of yields in continuous time that incorporates central bank policy. Policy-related events, such as FOMC meetings and releases of macroeconomic news the Fed cares about, are modeled as jumps. The model introduces a class of linear-quadratic jump-diffusions as state variables, which allows for a wide variety of jump types but still leads to tractable solutions for bond prices. I estimate a version of this model with U.S. interest rates, the Federal Reserve’s target rate, and key macroeconomic aggregates. The estimated model improves bond pricing, especially at short maturities. The “snake-shape ” of the volatility curve is linked to monetary policy inertia. A new monetary policy shock series is obtained by assuming that the Fed reacts to information available right before the FOMC meeting. According to the estimated policy rule, the Fed is mainly reacting to information contained in the yield-curve. Surprises in analyst forecasts turn out to be merely temporary components of macro variables, so that the “hump-shaped” yield response to these surprises is not consistent with a Taylor-type policy rule.

comments of the editor and an anonymous referee, who have helped tremendously in improving the content and exposition of the paper. Thanks also to Marco Avellaneda, Steven Evans, Eric

In this paper we propose to use a combination of regular and singular perturbations to analyze parabolic PDEs that arise in the context of pricing options when the volatility is a stochastic process that varies on several characteristic time scales. The classical Black-Scholes formula gives the price of call options when the underlying is a geometric Brownian motion with a constant volatility. The underlying might be the price of a stock or an index say and a constant volatility corresponds to a fixed standard deviation for the random fluctuations in the returns of the underlying. Modern market phenomena makes it important to analyze the situation when this volatility is not fixed but rather is heterogeneous and varies with time. In previous work, see for instance [5], we considered the situation when the volatility is fast mean reverting. Using a singular perturbation expansion we derived an approximation for option prices. We also provided a calibration method using observed option prices as represented by the so-called term structure of implied volatility. Our analysis of market data, however, shows the need for introducing also a slowly varying factor in the model for the stochastic volatility. The combination of regular and singular perturbations approach that we set forth in this paper deals with this case. The resulting approximation is still independent of the particular details of the volatility model and gives more flexibility in the parametrization of the

We present derivative pricing and estimation tools for a class of stochastic volatility models that exploit the observed "bursty" or persistent nature of stock price volatility. An empirical analysis of high-frequency S&P 500 index data confirms that volatility reverts slowly to its mean in comparison to the tick-by-tick fluctuations of the index value, but it is fast mean-reverting when looked at over the time scale of a derivative contract (many months). This motivates an asymptotic analysis of the partial differential equation satisfied by derivative prices, utilizing the distinction between these time scales. The analysis yields pricing and implied volatility formulas, and the latter is used to "fit the smile" from European index option prices. The theory identifies the important group parameters that are needed for the derivative pricing and hedging problem for European-style securities, namely the average volatility and the slope and intercept of the implied volatility line, plotted as a function of the log-moneyness-to-maturity-ratio. The results considerably simplify the estimation procedure, and the data produces estimates

This paper characterizes the arbitrage-free dynamics of interest rates, in the presence of both jumps and diffusion, when the term structure is modeled through simple forward rates (i.e., through discretely compounded forward rates evolving continuously in time) or forward swap rates. Whereas instantaneous continuously compounded rates form the basis of most traditional interest rate models, simply compounded rates and their parameters are more directly observable in practice and are the basis of recent research on "market models." We consider very general types of jump processes, modeled through marked point processes, allowing randomness in jump sizes and dependence between jump sizes, jump times, and interest rates. We make explicit how jump and diffusion risk premia enter into the dynamics of simple forward rates.

Previous research has shown that under a suitable no-jump condition, the price of a defaultable security is equal to its risk-neutral expected discounted cash flows if a modified discount rate is introduced to account for the possibility of default. Below, we generalize this result by demonstrating that one can always value defaultable claims using expected risk-adjusted discounting provided that the expectation is taken under a slightly modified probability measure. This new probability measure puts zero probability on paths where default occurs prior to the maturity, and is thus only absolutely continuous with respect to the risk-neutral probability measure. After establishing the general result and discussing its relation with the existing literature, we investigate several examples for which the no-jump condition fails. Each example illustrates the power of our general formula by providing simple analytic solutions for the prices of defaultable securities.

This paper is part of the working papers series of the Program on Workable Energy Regulation (POWER). POWER is a program of the University of California Energy Institute, a multicampus research unit of the University of California, located on the Berkeley campus

This paper proves a convergence result for a discretization scheme for simulating jumpdi #usion processes with state-dependent jump intensities. With a bound on the intensity, the point process of jump times can be constructed by thinning a Poisson random measure using state-dependent thinning probabilities. Between the jump epochs of the Poisson random measure, the dynamics of the constructed process are purely di#usive and may be simulated using standard discretization methods. Under conditions on the coe#cient functions of the jump-di#usion process, we show that the weak convergence order of this method equals the weak convergence order of the scheme used for the purely di#usive intervals: the construction of jumps does not degrade the convergence of the method.

The likelihood ration method (LRM) is a technique for estimating derivatives of expectations through simulation. LRM estimators are constructed from the derivatives of probability densities of inputs to a simulation. We investigate the application of the likelihood ratio method for sensitivity estimation when the relevant densities for the underlying model are known only through their characteristic functions or Laplace transforms. This problem arises in financial applications, where sensitivities are used for managing risk and where a substantial class of models have transition densities known only through their transforms. We quantify various sources of errors arising when numerical transform inversion is used to sample through the characteristic function and to evaluate the density and its derivative, as required in LRM. This analysis provides guidance for setting parameters in the method to accelerate convergence. 1