In this paper, we review recent work aimed at the application of declarative logic programming to knowledge representation in artificial intelligence. We consider exten- sions of the language of definite logic programs by classical (strong) negation, disjunc- tion, and some modal operators and show how each of the added features extends the representational power of the language.

Recently well-quasi orders in general, and homeomorphic embedding in particular, have gained popularity to ensure the termination of program analysis, specialisation and transformation techniques. In this paper,

data types are facilitated in Godel by its type and module systems. Thus, in order to describe the meta-programming facilities of Godel, a brief account of these systems is given. Each constant, function, predicate, and proposition in a Godel program must be specified by a language declaration. The type of a variable is not declared but inferred from its context within a particular program statement. To illustrate the type system, we give the language declarations that would be required for the program in Figure 1. BASE Name. CONSTANT Tom, Jerry : Name. PREDICATE Chase : Name * Name; Cat, Mouse : Name. Note that the declaration beginning BASE indicates that Name is a base type. In the statement Chase(x,y) !- Cat(x) & Mouse(y). the variables x and y are inferred to be of type Name. Polymorphic types can also be defined in Godel. They are constructed from the base types, type variables called parameters, and type constructors. Each constructor has an arity 1 attached to it. As an...

Logic programming has been introduced as programming in the Horn clause subset of first order logic. This view breaks down for the negation as failure inference rule. To overcome the problem, one line of research has been to view a logic program as a set of iff-definitions. A second approach was to identify a unique canonical, preferred or intended model among the models of the program and to appeal to common sense to validate the choice of such model. Another line of research developed the view of logic programming as a non-monotonic reasoning formalism strongly related to Default Logic and Auto-epistemic Logic. These competing approaches have resulted in some confusion about the declarative meaning of logic programming. This paper investigates the problem and proposes an alternative epistemological foundation for the canonical model approach, which is not based on common sense but on a solid mathematical information principle. The thesis is developed that logic programming can be understood as a natural and general logic of inductive definitions. In particular, logic programs with negation represent non-monotone inductive definitions. It is argued that this thesis results in an alternative justification of the well-founded model as the unique intended model of the logic program. In addition, it equips logic programs with an easy to comprehend meaning

Partial deduction strategies for logic programs often use an abstraction operator to guarantee the finiteness of the set of goals for which partial deductions are produced. Finding an abstraction operator which guarantees finiteness and does not lose relevant information is a difficult problem. In earlier work Gallagher and Bruynooghe proposed to base the abstraction operator on characteristic paths and trees, which capture the structure of the generated incomplete SLDNF-tree for a given goal. In this paper we exhibit the advantages of characteristic trees over purely syntactical measures: if characteristic trees can be preserved upon generalisation, then we obtain an almost perfect abstraction operator, providing just enough polyvariance to avoid any loss of local specialisation. Unfortunately, the abstraction operators proposed in earlier work do not always preserve the characteristic trees upon generalisation. We show that this can lead to important specialisation losses as well as to non-termination of the partial deduction algorithm. Furthermore, this problem cannot be adequately solved in the ordinary partial deduction setting. We therefore extend the expressivity and precision of the Lloyd and Shepherdson partial deduction framework by integrating constraints. We provide formal correctness results for the so obtained generic framework of constrained partial deduction. Within this new framework we are, among others, able to overcome the above mentioned problems by introducing an alternative abstraction operator, based on so called pruning constraints. We thus present a terminating partial deduction strategy which, for purely determinate unfolding rules, induces no loss of local specialisation due to the abstraction while ensuring correctness o...

Integrity constraints are very useful in many contexts, such as, for example, deductive databases, abductive and inductive logic programming. However, fully testing the integrity constraints after each update or modification can be very expensive and methods have been developed which simplify the integrity constraints. In this paper, we pursue the goal of writing this simplification procedure as a meta-program in logic programming and then using partial deduction to obtain pre-compiled integrity checks for certain update patterns. We argue that the ground representation has to be used to write this metaprogram declaratively. We however also show that, contrary to what one might expect, current partial deduction techniques are then unable to specialise this meta-interpreter in an interesting way and no pre-compilation of integrity checks can be obtained. In fact, we show that partial deduction (alone) is not able to perform any (sophisticated) specialisation at the object-level for meta...

Abstract not found

. In this paper, we reconsider the problem of specialising the vanilla meta interpreter through fully automatic and completely general partial deduction techniques. In particular, we study how the homeomorphic embedding relation guides specialisation of the interpreter. We focus on the so-called parsing problem, i.e. removing all parsing overhead from the program, and demonstrate that further refinements in the control of general partial deduction are necessary to properly deal with it. In particular, we modify local control on the basis of information imported from the global level. The resulting control strategy, while remaining fully general, leads to excellent specialisation of vanilla like meta programs. Parsing is always specialised, but -- appropriately, as we will show -- not always completely removed. As a concrete application, we subject an extended vanilla meta interpreter capable of dealing with compositions of programs to our techniques, showing we equal or surpass results obtained through a more ad hoc approach. 1

We show here that verification of Prolog programs can be systematically carried out within a simple framework which comprises syntactic analysis, declarative semantics, modes and types. We apply these techniques to study termination, partial correctness, occurcheck freedom, absence of errors and absence of floundering. Finally, we discuss which aspects of these techniques can be automated. Notes. This research was partly supported by the ESPRIT Basic Research Action 6810 (Compulog 2). A preliminary, shorter, version of this paper appeared as Apt [3]. 1 Introduction 1.1 Motivation Prolog is 20 years old and so is logic programming. However, they were developed separately and these two developments never really merged. The first track is best exemplified by Sterling and Shapiro [36], which puts emphasis on programming style and techniques, and the second by Lloyd [25], which concentrates on the theoretical foundations. As a result of these separate developments, until recently little...

We present the basic principles and possible applications of systems capable of meta-reasoning and reflection. After a discussion of the seminal approaches, we outline our own perception of the state of the art, mainly but not only in computational logic and logic programming. We review relevat successful...