Prove that (iv) Is it still the case that p q in -calculus with convergence testing (where is applicative bisimilarity of the augmented calculus)? No proof is required. Michaelmas 1996, chlo University of Oxford, MSc (Maths & FoCS) Lambda Calculus Mini-pr (0)

by y
Venue:x ^ y) _ (x ^ z): (ii) Suppose that a subset X = X 1 [ X 2 of a Scott domain is bounded above then G X = ( G X1) _ ( G X