Results 11  20
of
638
Pathwise coordinate optimization
, 2007
"... We consider “oneatatime ” coordinatewise descent algorithms for a class of convex optimization problems. An algorithm of this kind has been proposed for the L1penalized regression (lasso) in the lterature, but it seems to have been largely ignored. Indeed, it seems that coordinatewise algorith ..."
Abstract

Cited by 166 (19 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We consider “oneatatime ” coordinatewise descent algorithms for a class of convex optimization problems. An algorithm of this kind has been proposed for the L1penalized regression (lasso) in the lterature, but it seems to have been largely ignored. Indeed, it seems that coordinatewise algorithms are not often used in convex optimization. We show that this algorithm is very competitive with the well known LARS (or homotopy) procedure in large lasso problems, and that it can be applied to related methods such as the garotte and elastic net. It turns out that coordinatewise descent does not work in the “fused lasso ” however, so we derive a generalized algorithm that yields the solution in much less time that a standard convex optimizer. Finally we generalize the procedure to the twodimensional fused lasso, and demonstrate its performance on some image smoothing problems.
An interiorpoint method for largescale l1regularized logistic regression
 Journal of Machine Learning Research
, 2007
"... Logistic regression with ℓ1 regularization has been proposed as a promising method for feature selection in classification problems. In this paper we describe an efficient interiorpoint method for solving largescale ℓ1regularized logistic regression problems. Small problems with up to a thousand ..."
Abstract

Cited by 153 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Logistic regression with ℓ1 regularization has been proposed as a promising method for feature selection in classification problems. In this paper we describe an efficient interiorpoint method for solving largescale ℓ1regularized logistic regression problems. Small problems with up to a thousand or so features and examples can be solved in seconds on a PC; medium sized problems, with tens of thousands of features and examples, can be solved in tens of seconds (assuming some sparsity in the data). A variation on the basic method, that uses a preconditioned conjugate gradient method to compute the search step, can solve very large problems, with a million features and examples (e.g., the 20 Newsgroups data set), in a few minutes, on a PC. Using warmstart techniques, a good approximation of the entire regularization path can be computed much more efficiently than by solving a family of problems independently.
Projected gradient methods for Nonnegative Matrix Factorization
 Neural Computation
, 2007
"... Nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) can be formulated as a minimization problem with bound constraints. Although boundconstrained optimization has been studied extensively in both theory and practice, so far no study has formally applied its techniques to NMF. In this paper, we propose two proj ..."
Abstract

Cited by 134 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) can be formulated as a minimization problem with bound constraints. Although boundconstrained optimization has been studied extensively in both theory and practice, so far no study has formally applied its techniques to NMF. In this paper, we propose two projected gradient methods for NMF, both of which exhibit strong optimization properties. We discuss efficient implementations and demonstrate that one of the proposed methods converges faster than the popular multiplicative update approach. A simple MATLAB code is also provided. 1
MAP estimation via agreement on trees: Messagepassing and linear programming
, 2002
"... We develop and analyze methods for computing provably optimal maximum a posteriori (MAP) configurations for a subclass of Markov random fields defined on graphs with cycles. By decomposing the original distribution into a convex combination of treestructured distributions, we obtain an upper bound ..."
Abstract

Cited by 132 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We develop and analyze methods for computing provably optimal maximum a posteriori (MAP) configurations for a subclass of Markov random fields defined on graphs with cycles. By decomposing the original distribution into a convex combination of treestructured distributions, we obtain an upper bound on the optimal value of the original problem (i.e., the log probability of the MAP assignment) in terms of the combined optimal values of the tree problems. We prove that this upper bound is tight if and only if all the tree distributions share an optimal configuration in common. An important implication is that any such shared configuration must also be a MAP configuration for the original distribution. Next we develop two approaches to attempting to obtain tight upper bounds: (a) a treerelaxed linear program (LP), which is derived from the Lagrangian dual of the upper bounds; and (b) a treereweighted maxproduct messagepassing algorithm that is related to but distinct from the maxproduct algorithm. In this way, we establish a connection between a certain LP relaxation of the modefinding problem, and a reweighted form of the maxproduct (minsum) messagepassing algorithm.
Fair resource allocation in wireless networks using queuelengthbased scheduling and congestion control
 In Proceedings of IEEE Infocom
, 2005
"... We consider the problem of allocating resources (time slots, frequency, power, etc.) at a base station to many competing flows, where each flow is intended for a different receiver. The channel conditions may be timevarying and different for different receivers. It is wellknown that appropriately ..."
Abstract

Cited by 128 (22 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We consider the problem of allocating resources (time slots, frequency, power, etc.) at a base station to many competing flows, where each flow is intended for a different receiver. The channel conditions may be timevarying and different for different receivers. It is wellknown that appropriately chosen queuelength based policies are throughputoptimal while other policies based on the estimation of channel statistics can be used to allocate resources fairly (such as proportional fairness) among competing users. In this paper, we show that a combination of queuelengthbased scheduling at the base station and congestion control implemented either at the base station or at the end users can lead to fair resource allocation and queuelength stability.
Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Channel Allocation in Cellular Telephone Systems
"... In cellular telephone systems, an important problem is to dynamically allocate the communication resource (channels) so as to maximize service in a stochastic caller environment. This problem is naturally formulated as a dynamic programming problem and we use a reinforcement learning (RL) method to ..."
Abstract

Cited by 124 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In cellular telephone systems, an important problem is to dynamically allocate the communication resource (channels) so as to maximize service in a stochastic caller environment. This problem is naturally formulated as a dynamic programming problem and we use a reinforcement learning (RL) method to find dynamic channel allocation policies that are better than previous heuristic solutions. The policies obtained perform well for a broad variety of call traffic patterns. We present results on a large cellular system with approximately 49^49 states.
CongestionDependent Pricing of Network Services
 IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking
, 1998
"... Weconsider a service provider (SP) who provides access to a communication network or some other form of online services. Users access the network and initiate calls that belong to a set of diverse service classes, differing in resource requirements, demand pattern, and call duration. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 123 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Weconsider a service provider (SP) who provides access to a communication network or some other form of online services. Users access the network and initiate calls that belong to a set of diverse service classes, differing in resource requirements, demand pattern, and call duration.
Scalable training of L1regularized loglinear models
 In ICML ’07
, 2007
"... The lbfgs limitedmemory quasiNewton method is the algorithm of choice for optimizing the parameters of largescale loglinear models with L2 regularization, but it cannot be used for an L1regularized loss due to its nondifferentiability whenever some parameter is zero. Efficient algorithms have ..."
Abstract

Cited by 122 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The lbfgs limitedmemory quasiNewton method is the algorithm of choice for optimizing the parameters of largescale loglinear models with L2 regularization, but it cannot be used for an L1regularized loss due to its nondifferentiability whenever some parameter is zero. Efficient algorithms have been proposed for this task, but they are impractical when the number of parameters is very large. We present an algorithm OrthantWise Limitedmemory QuasiNewton (owlqn), based on lbfgs, that can efficiently optimize the L1regularized loglikelihood of loglinear models with millions of parameters. In our experiments on a parse reranking task, our algorithm was several orders of magnitude faster than an alternative algorithm, and substantially faster than lbfgs on the analogous L2regularized problem. We also present a proof that owlqn is guaranteed to converge to a globally optimal parameter vector. 1.
MachineLearning Research  Four Current Directions
"... Machine Learning research has been making great progress in many directions. This article summarizes four of these directions and discusses some current open problems. The four directions are (a) improving classification accuracy by learning ensembles of classifiers, (b) methods for scaling up super ..."
Abstract

Cited by 114 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Machine Learning research has been making great progress in many directions. This article summarizes four of these directions and discusses some current open problems. The four directions are (a) improving classification accuracy by learning ensembles of classifiers, (b) methods for scaling up supervised learning algorithms, (c) reinforcement learning, and (d) learning complex stochastic models.
An introduction to boosting and leveraging
 Advanced Lectures on Machine Learning, LNCS
, 2003
"... ..."