Results 1 -
4 of
4
Acquisition And Structuring Of An Ontology Within Conceptual Graphs
- University of Maryland, College Park, MD
, 1994
"... The elicitation of the ontology -- i.e. the objects of a domain -- is a key issue of conceptual modelling and therefore of knowledge acquisition. The Conceptual Graph Theory provides a knowledge representation formalism to be used in knowledgebased systems with an explicit "type lattice" to accou ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 13 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
The elicitation of the ontology -- i.e. the objects of a domain -- is a key issue of conceptual modelling and therefore of knowledge acquisition. The Conceptual Graph Theory provides a knowledge representation formalism to be used in knowledgebased systems with an explicit "type lattice" to account for the ontology. Since knowledge is in most AI applications non formal, it has to be normalized to ensure that the formal exploitation of its representation conforms to its meaning in the domain. Noting the intensional nature of types, which reflect the essences of the objects they denote, this normalization relies on a commitment on type definitions by necessary and sufficient conditions at the knowledge level. Our claim is that the taxonomic structure that accounts for the intensional nature of the ontology can be nothing but a tree, precluding tangled taxonomies. From this starting point, we derive methodological principles to constrain the acquisition of the "type tree", thus...
Modelling Uncertainty in Expertise
- Proceedings of IT&KNOWS Conference, 15th IFIP World Computer Congress '98
"... Almost all approaches of model-based development of knowledge-based systems are lacking an explicit handling of uncertain knowledge. Based on a KADS-oriented model of expertise our paper presents a general framework that enables the representation of uncertainty in a structure of causality. Based on ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 5 (4 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Almost all approaches of model-based development of knowledge-based systems are lacking an explicit handling of uncertain knowledge. Based on a KADS-oriented model of expertise our paper presents a general framework that enables the representation of uncertainty in a structure of causality. Based on an existing model of expertise we introduce a separate model of uncertainty, whose elements are represented independent of specific numerical processing methods. With this approach we got the foundations of a model-based framework integrating different kinds of uncertain information.
Capturing Uncertainty in Models of Expertise
- In Proceedings of the KEML98 workshop
, 1998
"... Almost all approaches of model-based development of knowledge-based systems are lacking an explicit handling of uncertain knowledge. ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
Almost all approaches of model-based development of knowledge-based systems are lacking an explicit handling of uncertain knowledge.
ARKTOS: A Knowledge Engineering Software Tool for Images
, 2002
"... The goal of our ARKTOS project is to build an intelligent knowledge-based system to classify satellite sea ice images. It involves acquiring knowledge from sea ice experts, quantifying such knowledge as computational entities, and ultimately building an intelligent classifier. In this paper we de ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
The goal of our ARKTOS project is to build an intelligent knowledge-based system to classify satellite sea ice images. It involves acquiring knowledge from sea ice experts, quantifying such knowledge as computational entities, and ultimately building an intelligent classifier. In this paper we describe a two-stage knowledge engineering approach that facilitates explicit knowledge transfer, converting implicit visual cues and cognition of the experts to explicit attributes and rules implemented by the engineers. First, there is a prototyping stage that involves interviewing sea ice experts, transcribing the sessions, identifying descriptors and rules, designing and implementing the knowledge, and delivering the prototype. The objective of this stage is to obtain a modestly accurate classification system quickly. Second, there is a refinement stage that involves evaluating the prototype, refining the knowledge base, modifying the design, and re-evaluating the improved system. Since the refinement is evaluation-driven, the experts and the engineers are motivated explicitly to improve the knowledge base and are able to communicate with each other using a common, consistent platform. Moreover, since the classification result is immediately available, both sides are able to efficiently assess the correctness of the system. To facilitate the knowledge engineering of the second stage, we have designed and built three Java-based graphical user interfaces: arktosGUI, arktosViewer, and arktosEditor. arktosGUI concentrates on feature-based refinement of specific attributes and rules.

