We show how to write generic programs and proofs in MartinL of type theory. To this end we consider several extensions of MartinL of's logical framework for dependent types. Each extension has a universes of codes (signatures) for inductively defined sets with generic formation, introduction, elimination, and equality rules. These extensions are modeled on Dybjer and Setzer's finitely axiomatized theories of inductive-recursive definitions, which also have a universe of codes for sets, and generic formation, introduction, elimination, and equality rules.

We give two nite axiomatizations of indexed inductive-recursive de nitions in intuitionistic type theory. They extend our previous nite axiomatizations of inductive-recursive de nitions of sets to indexed families of sets and encompass virtually all de nitions of sets which have been used in intuitionistic type theory. The more restricted of the two axiomatization arises naturally by considering indexed inductive-recursive de nitions as initial algebras in slice categories, whereas the other admits a more general and convenient form of an introduction rule.

This article The purpose of this paper is to introduce b, a simply typed -calculus that supports type-based recursive definitions. Although heavily inspired from previous work by Giménez (Giménez 1998) and closely related to recent work by Amadio and Coupet (Amadio and Coupet-Grimal 1998), the technical machinery behind our system puts a slightly different emphasis on the interpretation of types. More precisely, we formalize the notion of type-based termination using a restricted form of type dependency (a.k.a. indexed types), as popularized by (Xi and Pfenning 1998; Xi and Pfenning 1999). This leads to a simple and intuitive system which is robust under several extensions, such as mutually inductive datatypes and mutually recursive function definitions; however, such extensions are not treated in the paper

This paper presents a system for amorphous program slicing which combines slicing and transformation to achieve thinner slices than are possible using conventional syntax-preserving slicing. The approach involves the validation of the transformation and slicing steps using the Coq proof assistant, thereby guaranteeing the correctness of the amorphous slices produced. The combined application of slicing and transformation is illustrated with a simple case study.

This paper is a comparative study of a number of (intensional-semantically distinct) least and greatest fixed point operators that natural-deduction proof systems for intuitionistic logics can be extended with in a proof-theoretically defendable way. Eight pairs of such operators are analysed. The exposition is centered around a cube-shaped classification where each node stands for an axiomatization of one pair of operators as logical constants by intended proof and reduction rules and each arc for a proof- and reduction-preserving encoding of one pair in terms of another. The three dimensions of the cube reflect three orthogonal binary options: conventional-style vs. Mendler-style, basic (``[co]iterative'') vs. enhanced (``primitive-[co]recursive''), simple vs. course-of-value [co]induction. Some of the axiomatizations and encodings are well-known; others, however, are novel; the classification into a cube is also new. The differences between the least fixed point operators considered are illustrated on the example of the corresponding natural number types.