Results 1  10
of
22
Static caching for incremental computation
 ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst
, 1998
"... A systematic approach is given for deriving incremental programs that exploit caching. The cacheandprune method presented in the article consists of three stages: (I) the original program is extended to cache the results of all its intermediate subcomputations as well as the nal result, (II) the e ..."
Abstract

Cited by 47 (19 self)
 Add to MetaCart
A systematic approach is given for deriving incremental programs that exploit caching. The cacheandprune method presented in the article consists of three stages: (I) the original program is extended to cache the results of all its intermediate subcomputations as well as the nal result, (II) the extended program is incrementalized so that computation on a new input can use all intermediate results on an old input, and (III) unused results cached by the extended program and maintained by the incremental program are pruned away, l e a ving a pruned extended program that caches only useful intermediate results and a pruned incremental program that uses and maintains only the useful results. All three stages utilize static analyses and semanticspreserving transformations. Stages I and III are simple, clean, and fully automatable. The overall method has a kind of optimality with respect to the techniques used in Stage II. The method can be applied straightforwardly to provide a systematic approach to program improvement via caching.
A ConstraintBased Architecture for Local Search
 In OOPLSA’02
, 2002
"... Combinatorial optimization problems are ubiquitous in many practical applications. Yet most of them are challenging, both from computational complexity and programming standpoints. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 39 (15 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Combinatorial optimization problems are ubiquitous in many practical applications. Yet most of them are challenging, both from computational complexity and programming standpoints.
Deriving incremental programs
, 1993
"... A systematic approach i s g i v en for deriving incremental programs from nonincremental programs written in a standard functional programming language. We exploit a number of program analysis and transformation techniques and domainspeci c knowledge, centered around e ective utilization of cachin ..."
Abstract

Cited by 39 (21 self)
 Add to MetaCart
A systematic approach i s g i v en for deriving incremental programs from nonincremental programs written in a standard functional programming language. We exploit a number of program analysis and transformation techniques and domainspeci c knowledge, centered around e ective utilization of caching, in order to provide a degree of incrementality not otherwise achievable by a generic incremental evaluator. 1
From Regular Expressions to DFA's Using Compressed NFA's
 Theoretical Computer Science
, 1992
"... To my parents and uncle Frank ..."
From Datalog rules to efficient programs with time and space guarantees
 In PPDP ’03: Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Principles and Practice of Declarative Programming
, 2003
"... This paper describes a method for transforming any given set of Datalog rules into an efficient specialized implementation with guaranteed worstcase time and space complexities, and for computing the complexities from the rules. The running time is optimal in the sense that only useful combinations ..."
Abstract

Cited by 30 (12 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This paper describes a method for transforming any given set of Datalog rules into an efficient specialized implementation with guaranteed worstcase time and space complexities, and for computing the complexities from the rules. The running time is optimal in the sense that only useful combinations of facts that lead to all hypotheses of a rule being simultaneously true are considered, and each such combination is considered exactly once. The associated space usage is optimal in that it is the minimum space needed for such consideration modulo scheduling optimizations that may eliminate some summands in the space usage formula. The transformation is based on a general method for algorithm design that exploits fixedpoint computation, incremental maintenance of invariants, and combinations of indexed and linked data structures. We apply the method to a number of analysis problems, some with improved algorithm complexities and all with greatly improved algorithm understanding and greatly simplified complexity analysis.
Dynamic programming via static incrementalization
 In Proceedings of the 8th European Symposium on Programming
, 1999
"... Dynamic programming is an important algorithm design technique. It is used for solving problems whose solutions involve recursively solving subproblems that share subsubproblems. While a straightforward recursive program solves common subsubproblems repeatedly and often takes exponential time, a dyn ..."
Abstract

Cited by 26 (12 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Dynamic programming is an important algorithm design technique. It is used for solving problems whose solutions involve recursively solving subproblems that share subsubproblems. While a straightforward recursive program solves common subsubproblems repeatedly and often takes exponential time, a dynamic programming algorithm solves every subsubproblem just once, saves the result, reuses it when the subsubproblem is encountered again, and takes polynomial time. This paper describes a systematic method for transforming programs written as straightforward recursions into programs that use dynamic programming. The method extends the original program to cache all possibly computed values, incrementalizes the extended program with respect to an input increment to use and maintain all cached results, prunes out cached results that are not used in the incremental computation, and uses the resulting incremental program to form an optimized new program. Incrementalization statically exploits semantics of both control structures and data structures and maintains as invariants equalities characterizing cached results. The principle underlying incrementalization is general for achieving drastic program speedups. Compared with previous methods that perform memoization or tabulation, the method based on incrementalization is more powerful and systematic. It has been implemented and applied to numerous problems and succeeded on all of them. 1
Caching intermediate results for program improvement
 In Proceedings of the 1995 ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Partial Evaluation and SemanticsBased Program Manipulation, PEPM ’95
, 1995
"... A systematic approach is given for symbolically caching intermediate results useful for deriving incremental programs from nonincremental programs. We exploit a number of program analysis and transformation techniques, centered around e ective c a c hing based on its utilization in deriving increme ..."
Abstract

Cited by 22 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
A systematic approach is given for symbolically caching intermediate results useful for deriving incremental programs from nonincremental programs. We exploit a number of program analysis and transformation techniques, centered around e ective c a c hing based on its utilization in deriving incremental programs, in order to increase the degree of incrementality not otherwise achievable by using only the return values of programs that are of direct interest. Our method can be applied straightforwardly to provide a systematic approach to program improvement via caching. 1
Loop optimization for aggregate array computations
"... An aggregate array computation is a loop that computes accumulated quantities over array elements. Such computations are common in programs that use arrays, and the array elements involved in such computations often overlap, especially across iterations of loops, resulting in signi cant redundancy ..."
Abstract

Cited by 15 (7 self)
 Add to MetaCart
An aggregate array computation is a loop that computes accumulated quantities over array elements. Such computations are common in programs that use arrays, and the array elements involved in such computations often overlap, especially across iterations of loops, resulting in signi cant redundancy in the overall computation. This paper presents a method and algorithms that eliminate such overlapping aggregate array redundancies and shows both analytical and experimental performance improvements. The method is based on incrementalization, i.e., updating the values of aggregate array computations from iteration to iteration rather than computing them from scratch in each iteration. This involves maintaining additional information not maintained in the original program. We reduce various analysis problems to solving inequality constraints on loop variables and array subscripts, and we apply results from work on array data dependence analysis. Incrementalizing aggregate array computations produces drastic program speedup compared to previous optimizations. Previous methods for loop optimizations of arrays do not perform incrementalization, and previous techniques for loop incrementalization do not handle arrays.
Universal regular path queries
 HigherOrder and Symbolic Computation
, 2003
"... Given are a directed edgelabelled graph G with a distinguished node n0, and a regular expression P which may contain variables. We wish to compute all substitutions φ (of symbols for variables), together with all nodes n such that all paths n0 → n are in φ(P). We derive an algorithm for this proble ..."
Abstract

Cited by 12 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Given are a directed edgelabelled graph G with a distinguished node n0, and a regular expression P which may contain variables. We wish to compute all substitutions φ (of symbols for variables), together with all nodes n such that all paths n0 → n are in φ(P). We derive an algorithm for this problem using relational algebra, and show how it may be implemented in Prolog. The motivation for the problem derives from a declarative framework for specifying compiler optimisations. 1 Bob Paige and IFIP WG 2.1 Bob Paige was a longstanding member of IFIP Working Group 2.1 on Algorithmic Languages and Calculi. In recent years, the main aim of this group has been to investigate the derivation of algorithms from specifications by program transformation. Already in the mideighties, Bob was way ahead of the pack: instead of applying transformational techniques to wellworn examples, he was applying his theories of program transformation to new problems, and discovering new algorithms [16, 48, 52]. The secret of his success lay partly in his insistence on the study of general algorithm design strategies (in particular