Results 1 -
4 of
4
How far can we go beyond linear cryptanalysis
- Advances in Cryptology - Asiacrypt’04, volume 3329 of LNCS
, 2004
"... Abstract. Several generalizations of linear cryptanalysis have been proposed in the past, as well as very similar attacks in a statistical point of view. In this paper, we define a rigorous general statistical framework which allows to interpret most of these attacks in a simple and unified way. The ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 32 (9 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract. Several generalizations of linear cryptanalysis have been proposed in the past, as well as very similar attacks in a statistical point of view. In this paper, we define a rigorous general statistical framework which allows to interpret most of these attacks in a simple and unified way. Then, we explicitely construct optimal distinguishers, we evaluate their performance, and we prove that a block cipher immune to classical linear cryptanalysis possesses some resistance to a wide class of generalized versions, but not all. Finally, we derive tools which are necessary to set up more elaborate extensions of linear cryptanalysis, and to generalize the notions of bias, characteristic, and piling-up lemma.
On the Optimality of Linear, Differential and Sequential Distinguishers
, 2003
"... In this paper, we consider the statistical decision processes behind a linear and a differential cryptanalysis. By applying techniques and concepts of statistical hypothesis testing, we describe precisely the shape of optimal linear and dierential distinguishers and we improve known results of Vaude ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 10 (3 self)
- Add to MetaCart
In this paper, we consider the statistical decision processes behind a linear and a differential cryptanalysis. By applying techniques and concepts of statistical hypothesis testing, we describe precisely the shape of optimal linear and dierential distinguishers and we improve known results of Vaudenay concerning their asymptotic behaviour. Furthermore, we formalize the concept of "sequential distinguisher" and we illustrate potential applications of such tools in various statistical attacks.
How Far Can We Go Beyond Linear Cryptanalysis?,”Asiacrypt 2004
- of LNCS
, 2004
"... Abstract. Several generalizations of linear cryptanalysis have been proposed in the past, as well as very similar attacks in a statistical point of view. In this paper, we define a rigorous general statistical framework which allows to interpret most of these attacks in a simple and unified way. The ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 4 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract. Several generalizations of linear cryptanalysis have been proposed in the past, as well as very similar attacks in a statistical point of view. In this paper, we define a rigorous general statistical framework which allows to interpret most of these attacks in a simple and unified way. Then, we explicitely construct optimal distinguishers, we evaluate their performance, and we prove that a block cipher immune to classical linear cryptanalysis possesses some resistance to a wide class of generalized versions, but not all. Finally, we derive tools which are necessary to set up more elaborate extensions of linear cryptanalysis, and to generalize the notions of bias, characteristic, and piling-up lemma. Keywords: Block ciphers, linear cryptanalysis, statistical cryptanalysis. 1 A Decade of Linear Cryptanalysis Linear cryptanalysis is a known-plaintext attack proposed in 1993 by Matsui[21, 22] to break DES [26], exploiting specific correlations between the input andthe output of a block cipher. Namely, the attack traces the statistical correlation between one bit of information about the plaintext and one bit of informationabout the ciphertext, both obtained linearly with respect to GF(2) L (where L is the block size of the cipher), by means of probabilistic linear expressions, aconcept previously introduced by Tardy-Corfdir and Gilbert [30]. Soon after, several attempts to generalize linear cryptanalysis are published:Kaliski and Robshaw [13] demonstrate how it is possible to combine several independent linear correlations depending on the same key bits. In [31], Vaudenaydefines another kind of attack on DES, called A^2-attack, and shows that one canobtain an attack slightly less powerful than a linear cryptanalysis, but without the need to know precisely what happens in the block cipher. Harpes, Kramer,and Massey [7] replace the linear expressions with so-called I/O sums, i.e., balanced binary-valued functions; they prove the potential effectiveness of such ageneralization by exhibiting a block cipher secure against conventional linear cryptanalysis but vulnerable to their generalization. Practical examples are theattack of Knudsen and Robshaw [15] against
Linear Cryptanalysis of Non Binary Ciphers with an Application to SAFER
"... Abstract. In this paper we re-visit distinguishing attacks. We show how to generalize the notion of linear distinguisher to arbitrary sets. Our thesis is that our generalization is the most natural one. We compare it with the one by Granboulan et al. from FSE’06 by showing that we can get sharp esti ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 2 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract. In this paper we re-visit distinguishing attacks. We show how to generalize the notion of linear distinguisher to arbitrary sets. Our thesis is that our generalization is the most natural one. We compare it with the one by Granboulan et al. from FSE’06 by showing that we can get sharp estimates of the data complexity and cumulate characteristics in linear hulls. As a proof of concept, we propose a better attack on their toy cipher TOY100 than the one that was originally suggested and we propose the best known plaintext attack on SAFER K/SK so far. This provides new directions to block cipher cryptanalysis even in the binary case. On the constructive side, we introduce DEAN18, a toy cipher which encrypts blocks of 18 decimal digits and we study its security. 1

