Results 1 
2 of
2
Space Efficient Hash Tables With Worst Case Constant Access Time
 In STACS
, 2003
"... We generalize Cuckoo Hashing [23] to dary Cuckoo Hashing and show how this yields a simple hash table data structure that stores n elements in (1 + ffl) n memory cells, for any constant ffl ? 0. Assuming uniform hashing, accessing or deleting table entries takes at most d = O(ln ffl ) probes ..."
Abstract

Cited by 51 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
We generalize Cuckoo Hashing [23] to dary Cuckoo Hashing and show how this yields a simple hash table data structure that stores n elements in (1 + ffl) n memory cells, for any constant ffl ? 0. Assuming uniform hashing, accessing or deleting table entries takes at most d = O(ln ffl ) probes and the expected amortized insertion time is constant. This is the first dictionary that has worst case constant access time and expected constant update time, works with (1 + ffl) n space, and supports satellite information. Experiments indicate that d = 4 choices suffice for ffl 0:03. We also describe variants of the data structure that allow the use of hash functions that can be evaluted in constant time.
Hashing, Randomness and Dictionaries
, 2002
"... This thesis is centered around one of the most basic information retrieval problems, namely that of storing and accessing the elements of a set. Each element in the set has some associated information that is returned along with it. The problem is referred to as the dictionary problem, due to the si ..."
Abstract

Cited by 3 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
This thesis is centered around one of the most basic information retrieval problems, namely that of storing and accessing the elements of a set. Each element in the set has some associated information that is returned along with it. The problem is referred to as the dictionary problem, due to the similarity to a bookshelf dictionary, which contains a set of words and has an explanation associated with each word. In the static version of the problem the set is fixed, whereas in the dynamic version, insertions and deletions of elements are possible. The approach