Results 1 
8 of
8
A Linear Logical Framework
, 1996
"... We present the linear type theory LLF as the forAppeared in the proceedings of the Eleventh Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science  LICS'96 (E. Clarke editor), pp. 264275, New Brunswick, NJ, July 2730 1996. mal basis for a conservative extension of the LF logical framework. LLF c ..."
Abstract

Cited by 216 (44 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We present the linear type theory LLF as the forAppeared in the proceedings of the Eleventh Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science  LICS'96 (E. Clarke editor), pp. 264275, New Brunswick, NJ, July 2730 1996. mal basis for a conservative extension of the LF logical framework. LLF combines the expressive power of dependent types with linear logic to permit the natural and concise representation of a whole new class of deductive systems, namely those dealing with state. As an example we encode a version of MiniML with references including its type system, its operational semantics, and a proof of type preservation. Another example is the encoding of a sequent calculus for classical linear logic and its cut elimination theorem. LLF can also be given an operational interpretation as a logic programming language under which the representations above can be used for type inference, evaluation and cutelimination. 1 Introduction A logical framework is a formal system desig...
On Equivalence and Canonical Forms in the LF Type Theory
 ACM Transactions on Computational Logic
, 2001
"... Decidability of definitional equality and conversion of terms into canonical form play a central role in the metatheory of a typetheoretic logical framework. Most studies of definitional equality are based on a confluent, stronglynormalizing notion of reduction. Coquand has considered a different ..."
Abstract

Cited by 83 (16 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Decidability of definitional equality and conversion of terms into canonical form play a central role in the metatheory of a typetheoretic logical framework. Most studies of definitional equality are based on a confluent, stronglynormalizing notion of reduction. Coquand has considered a different approach, directly proving the correctness of a practical equivalence algorithm based on the shape of terms. Neither approach appears to scale well to richer languages with unit types or subtyping, and neither directly addresses the problem of conversion to canonical form.
A concurrent logical framework I: Judgments and properties
, 2003
"... The Concurrent Logical Framework, or CLF, is a new logical framework in which concurrent computations can be represented as monadic objects, for which there is an intrinsic notion of concurrency. It is designed as a conservative extension of the linear logical framework LLF with the synchronous con ..."
Abstract

Cited by 74 (25 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The Concurrent Logical Framework, or CLF, is a new logical framework in which concurrent computations can be represented as monadic objects, for which there is an intrinsic notion of concurrency. It is designed as a conservative extension of the linear logical framework LLF with the synchronous connectives# of intuitionistic linear logic, encapsulated in a monad. LLF is itself a conservative extension of LF with the asynchronous connectives #, & and #.
Natural Deduction for Intuitionistic NonCommutative Linear Logic
 Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Typed Lambda Calculi and Applications (TLCA'99
, 1999
"... We present a system of natural deduction and associated term calculus for intuitionistic noncommutative linear logic (INCLL) as a conservative extension of intuitionistic linear logic. We prove subject reduction and the existence of canonical forms in the implicational fragment. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 33 (15 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We present a system of natural deduction and associated term calculus for intuitionistic noncommutative linear logic (INCLL) as a conservative extension of intuitionistic linear logic. We prove subject reduction and the existence of canonical forms in the implicational fragment.
A Linear Spine Calculus
 Journal of Logic and Computation
, 2003
"... We present the spine calculus S ##&# as an efficient representation for the linear #calculus # ##&# which includes unrestricted functions (#), linear functions (#), additive pairing (&), and additive unit (#). S ##&# enhances the representation of Church's simply typed #calculus by enforcing ..."
Abstract

Cited by 32 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We present the spine calculus S ##&# as an efficient representation for the linear #calculus # ##&# which includes unrestricted functions (#), linear functions (#), additive pairing (&), and additive unit (#). S ##&# enhances the representation of Church's simply typed #calculus by enforcing extensionality and by incorporating linear constructs. This approach permits procedures such as unification to retain the efficient head access that characterizes firstorder term languages without the overhead of performing #conversions at run time. Applications lie in proof search, logic programming, and logical frameworks based on linear type theories. It is also related to foundational work on term assignment calculi for presentations of the sequent calculus. We define the spine calculus, give translations of # ##&# into S ##&# and viceversa, prove their soundness and completeness with respect to typing and reductions, and show that the typable fragment of the spine calculus is strongly normalizing and admits unique canonical, i.e. ##normal, forms.
Categorical Term Rewriting: Monads and Modularity
 University of Edinburgh
, 1998
"... Term rewriting systems are widely used throughout computer science as they provide an abstract model of computation while retaining a comparatively simple syntax and semantics. In order to reason within large term rewriting systems, structuring operations are used to build large term rewriting syste ..."
Abstract

Cited by 11 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Term rewriting systems are widely used throughout computer science as they provide an abstract model of computation while retaining a comparatively simple syntax and semantics. In order to reason within large term rewriting systems, structuring operations are used to build large term rewriting systems from smaller ones. Of particular interest is whether key properties are modular, thatis,ifthe components of a structured term rewriting system satisfy a property, then does the term rewriting system as a whole? A body of literature addresses this problem, but most of the results and proofs depend on strong syntactic conditions and do not easily generalize. Although many specific modularity results are known, a coherent framework which explains the underlying principles behind these results is lacking. This thesis posits that part of the problem is the usual, concrete and syntaxoriented semantics of term rewriting systems, and that a semantics is needed which on the one hand elides unnecessary syntactic details but on the other hand still possesses enough expressive power to model the key concepts arising from
Life without the Terminal Type
"... Abstract. We introduce a method of extending arbitrary categories by a terminal object and apply this method in various type theoretic settings. In particular, we show that categories that are cartesian closed except for the lack of a terminal object have a universal full extension to a cartesian cl ..."
Abstract
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. We introduce a method of extending arbitrary categories by a terminal object and apply this method in various type theoretic settings. In particular, we show that categories that are cartesian closed except for the lack of a terminal object have a universal full extension to a cartesian closed category, and we characterize categories for which the latter category is a topos. Both the basic construction and its correctness proof are extremely simple. This is quite surprising in view of the fact that the corresponding results for the simply typed λcalculus with surjective pairing, in particular concerning the decision problem for equality of terms in the presence of a terminal type, are comparatively involved.
Syntactic Analysis of etaExpansions In Pure Type Systems
, 2002
"... By a detailed analysis of the interaction between reduction ! and expansion ! in the simply typed calculus, a modular and purely syntactic proof method is devised in order to derive strong normalization of the combined reduction ! from that of ! and ! . It is shown how this techniq ..."
Abstract
 Add to MetaCart
By a detailed analysis of the interaction between reduction ! and expansion ! in the simply typed calculus, a modular and purely syntactic proof method is devised in order to derive strong normalization of the combined reduction ! from that of ! and ! . It is shown how this technique extends to normalizing functional Pure Type Systems with Barthe's formulation of expansion.