Abstract not found

A rapidly growing literature has documented important improvements in financial return volatility measurement and forecasting via use of realized variation measures constructed from high-frequency returns coupled with simple modeling procedures. Building on recent theoretical results in Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard (2004a, 2005) for related bi-power variation measures, the present paper provides a practical and robust framework for non-parametrically measuring the jump component in asset return volatility. In an application to the DM/ $ exchange rate, the S&P500 market index, and the 30-year U.S. Treasury bond yield, we find that jumps are both highly prevalent and distinctly less persistent than the continuous sample path variation process. Moreover, many jumps appear directly associated with specific macroeconomic news announcements. Separating jump from non-jump movements in a simple but sophisticated volatility forecasting model, we find that almost all of the predictability in daily, weekly, and monthly return volatilities comes from the non-jump component. Our results thus set the stage for a number of interesting future econometric developments and important financial applications by separately modeling, forecasting, and pricing the continuous and jump components of the total return variation process.

Observed asset prices are known to deviate from their efficient values due to market microstructure frictions. This paper studies the effects of market microstructure noise on nonparametric estimates of the efficient price integrated variance. Specifically, we consider both asymptotic and finite sample effects of general market microstructure noise on realized variance estimates. The finite sample results culminate in a variance/bias trade-off that serves as a basis for an optimal sampling theory. Our theory also considers the effects of pre-filtering the data and proposes a novel bias-correction. We show that this theory is easily implementable in practise requiring only the calculation of sample moments of the observable high-frequency return data.

We develop general model-free adjustment procedures for the calculation of unbiased volatility loss functions based on practically feasible realized volatility benchmarks. The procedures, which exploit the recent non-parametric asymptotic distributional results in Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard (2002a) along with new results explicitly allowing for leverage effects, are both easy-to-implement and highly accurate in empirically realistic situations. On properly accounting for the measurement errors in the volatility forecast evaluations reported in Andersen, Bollerslev, Diebold and Labys (2003), the adjustments result in markedly higher estimates for the true degree of return volatility predictability.

A rapidly growing literature has documented important improvements in volatility measurement and forecasting performance through the use of realized volatilities constructed from high-frequency returns coupled with relatively simple reduced form time series modeling procedures. Building on recent theoretical results from Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard (2003c) for related bi-power variation measures involving the sum of high-frequency absolute returns, the present paper provides a practical framework for non-parametrically measuring the jump component in the realized volatility measurements. Exploiting these ideas for a decade of high-frequency five-minute returns for the DM/ $ exchange rate, the S&P500 aggregate market index, and the 30-year U.S. Treasury Bond, we find the jump components to be distinctly less persistent than the contribution to the overall return variability originating from the continuous sample path component of the price process. Explicitly including the jump measure as an additional explanatory variable in an easy-to-implement reduced form model for the realized volatilities results in highly significant jump coefficient estimates at the daily, weekly and quarterly forecasts horizons. As such, our results hold promise for improved financial asset allocation, risk management, and derivatives pricing, by separate modeling, forecasting and pricing of the continuous and jump components of the total return variability.

Abstract not found

We propose bootstrap methods for a general class of nonlinear transformations of realized volatility which includes the raw version of realized volatility and its logarithmic transformation as special cases. We consider the i.i.d. bootstrap and the wild bootstrap (WB) and prove their first-order asymptotic validity under general assumptions on the log-price process that allow for drift and leverage effects. We derive Edgeworth expansions in a simpler model that rules out these effects. The i.i.d. bootstrap provides a second-order asymptotic refinement when volatility is constant, but not otherwise. The WB yields a second-order asymptotic refinement under stochastic volatility provided we choose the external random variable used to construct the WB data appropriately. None of these methods provide third-order asymptotic refinements. Both methods improve upon the first-order asymptotic theory in finite samples.

This paper shows that the asymptotic normal approximation is often insufficiently accurate for volatility estimators based on high frequency data. To remedy this, we derive Edgeworth expansions for such estimators. The expansions are developed in the framework of small-noise asymptotics. The results have application to Cornish-Fisher inversion and help setting intervals more accurately than those relying on normal distribution.

In the paper we study the relationship between macroeconomic and stock market volatility, using S&P500 data for the period 1970-2001. We find weak evidence of long memory in volatility once structural change is accounted for and a twofold linkage between stock market and macroeconomic volatility: macroeconomic volatility explains the persitent dynamics in stock market volatility, while stock market volatility has significant but short lived effects on output and inflation volatility.

This note develops general model-free adjustment procedures for the calculation of unbiased volatility loss functions based on practically feasible realized volatility benchmarks. The procedures, which exploit the recent asymptotic distributional results in Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard (2002a), are both easy-to-implement and highly accurate in empirically realistic situations. On properly accounting for the measurement errors in the volatility forecast evaluations reported in Andersen, Bollerslev, Diebold and Labys (2003), the adjustments result in markedly higher estimates for the true degree of return-volatility predictability.